Automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance image analysis with fully convolutional networks

BackgroundCardiovascular resonance (CMR) imaging is a standard imaging modality for assessing cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), the leading cause of death globally. CMR enables accurate quantification of the cardiac chamber volume, ejection fraction and myocardial mass, providing information for diagnosis and monitoring of CVDs. However, for years, clinicians have been relying on manual approaches for CMR image analysis, which is time consuming and prone to subjective errors. It is a major clinical challenge to automatically derive quantitative and clinically relevant information from CMR images.MethodsDeep neural networks have shown a great potential in image pattern recognition and segmentation for a variety of tasks. Here we demonstrate an automated analysis method for CMR images, which is based on a fully convolutional network (FCN). The network is trained and evaluated on a large-scale dataset from the UK Biobank, consisting of 4,875 subjects with 93,500 pixelwise annotated images. The performance of the method has been evaluated using a number of technical metrics, including the Dice metric, mean contour distance and Hausdorff distance, as well as clinically relevant measures, including left ventricle (LV) end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and end-systolic volume (LVESV), LV mass (LVM); right ventricle (RV) end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) and end-systolic volume (RVESV).ResultsBy combining FCN with a large-scale annotated dataset, the proposed automated method achieves a high performance in segmenting the LV and RV on short-axis CMR images and the left atrium (LA) and right atrium (RA) on long-axis CMR images. On a short-axis image test set of 600 subjects, it achieves an average Dice metric of 0.94 for the LV cavity, 0.88 for the LV myocardium and 0.90 for the RV cavity. The mean absolute difference between automated measurement and manual measurement is 6.1 mL for LVEDV, 5.3 mL for LVESV, 6.9 gram for LVM, 8.5 mL for RVEDV and 7.2 mL for RVESV. On long-axis image test sets, the average Dice metric is 0.93 for the LA cavity (2-chamber view), 0.95 for the LA cavity (4-chamber view) and 0.96 for the RA cavity (4-chamber view). The performance is comparable to human inter-observer variability.ConclusionsWe show that an automated method achieves a performance on par with human experts in analysing CMR images and deriving clinically relevant measures.

[1]  Felix Lau,et al.  FastVentricle: Cardiac Segmentation with ENet , 2017, FIMH.

[2]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift , 2015, ICML.

[3]  Gary Marcus,et al.  Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisal , 2018, ArXiv.

[4]  Xin Yang,et al.  Deep Learning Techniques for Automatic MRI Cardiac Multi-Structures Segmentation and Diagnosis: Is the Problem Solved? , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  How transferable are features in deep neural networks? , 2014, NIPS.

[6]  Gustavo Carneiro,et al.  Left ventricle segmentation from cardiac MRI combining level set methods with deep belief networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[7]  C. Sudlow,et al.  Comparison of Sociodemographic and Health-Related Characteristics of UK Biobank Participants With Those of the General Population , 2017, American journal of epidemiology.

[8]  Stefan K. Piechnik,et al.  Reference ranges for cardiac structure and function using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in Caucasians from the UK Biobank population cohort , 2017, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[9]  Showcase , 2007 .

[10]  Jian Sun,et al.  Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[11]  Kieran Clarke,et al.  Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Determinants of Left Ventricular Mass in Obesity; a Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Study , 2022 .

[12]  Hamid Jafarkhani,et al.  A combined deep-learning and deformable-model approach to fully automatic segmentation of the left ventricle in cardiac MRI , 2015, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  Dudley J Pennell,et al.  Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[15]  Demis Hassabis,et al.  Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search , 2016, Nature.

[16]  L. A. Bonet,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 , 2010, European journal of heart failure.

[17]  Gustavo Carneiro,et al.  Combining deep learning and level set for the automated segmentation of the left ventricle of the heart from cardiac cine magnetic resonance , 2017, Medical Image Anal..

[18]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[19]  Juerg Schwitter,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 , 2010, European journal of heart failure.

[20]  Phi Vu Tran,et al.  A Fully Convolutional Neural Network for Cardiac Segmentation in Short-Axis MRI , 2016, ArXiv.

[21]  Iasonas Kokkinos,et al.  DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFs , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[22]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks , 2017, Nature.

[23]  Liming Wang,et al.  An artificial intelligence platform for the multihospital collaborative management of congenital cataracts , 2017, Nature Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[25]  P. Matthews,et al.  UK Biobank’s cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol , 2015, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[26]  Anna Strömberg,et al.  ESC GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC HEART FAILURE 2008 (ENDING) , 2009 .

[27]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Ass , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  J P Greenwood,et al.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: what the general cardiologist should know , 2016, Heart.

[29]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.

[30]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.