Design's processional character

In this paper, we examine the ideas behind and reactions to a prototype online tool designed, in-house, for an art college's interaction design department. The web-based prototype, the Digital Scrapbook, was initially intended as a tool for tutors to oversee their students' work. However, our ongoing discussions with the department's members indicate that it is more interesting to its target audience for a variety of other reasons, including its role in design inspiration; group representation and collaboration; and as a repository for documenting the creative process. We speculate on the reasons behind this by further reflecting on the reactions to the tool. We come to the conclusion that members of the department value the Digital Scrapbook because it is seen to reflect the processional character of design. That is, we suggest the system is seen as promising because it reveals the often messy, unintended and meandering routes design can follow. In closing, we suggest how we might support further ways of displaying design's processional character and discuss the broader implications of displaying collective processes.

[1]  Danny Miller,et al.  The Comfort of Things , 2008 .

[2]  Barton C. Massey,et al.  DESIGN METHODS , 2002 .

[3]  T. Ingold.  Walking the Plank: Meditations on a Process of Skill , 2006 .

[4]  Victor Margolin,et al.  The idea of design , 1995 .

[5]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Getting inspired!: understanding how and why examples are used in creative design practice , 2009, CHI.

[6]  John R. Dakers,et al.  Defining Technological Literacy , 2006 .

[7]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[8]  Duncan Sanderson,et al.  Coordinating joint design work: the role of communication and artefacts , 1998 .

[9]  Jonas Löwgren,et al.  Applying design methodology to software development , 1995, Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems.

[10]  Christine Reid,et al.  The Myth of the Paperless Office , 2003, J. Documentation.

[11]  Steve Benford,et al.  Ambiguity as a resource for design , 2003, CHI '03.

[12]  Allison Druin,et al.  Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families , 2003, CHI '03.

[13]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Design research as explanation: perceptions in the field , 2009, CHI.

[14]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation , 2006, DIS '06.

[15]  Scott R. Klemmer,et al.  Hacking, Mashing, Gluing: Understanding Opportunistic Design , 2008, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[16]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[17]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Design: Cultural probes , 1999, INTR.

[18]  Bill Moggridge,et al.  Designing interactions , 2006 .

[19]  D. Schoen.  Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[20]  Paul Dourish,et al.  How HCI interprets the probes , 2007, CHI.

[21]  Bill Buxton,et al.  Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design , 2007 .

[22]  Caroline Hummels,et al.  The reflective transformative design process , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[23]  Daniel Fallman,et al.  Design-oriented human-computer interaction , 2003, CHI '03.

[24]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Organizing Alignment: A Case of Bridge-Building , 2000 .

[25]  Tracee Vetting Wolf,et al.  Dispelling "design" as the black art of CHI , 2006, CHI.

[26]  Deborah G. Tatar,et al.  "It's Just a Method!": a pedagogical experiment in interdisciplinary design , 2006, DIS '06.

[27]  Jeffrey Huang,et al.  OpenD: supporting parallel development of digital designs , 2005, DUX '05.

[28]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[29]  James A. Landay,et al.  Interactive sketching for the early stages of user interface design , 1995, CHI '95.

[30]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Understanding knowledge management practices for early design activity and its implications for reuse , 2009, CHI.

[31]  Lawrence Dowler.  Gateways to knowledge : the role of academic libraries in teaching, learning, and research , 1997 .

[32]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI , 2007, CHI.

[33]  Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer,et al.  The design way , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..