Using Habitat Equivalency Analysis to Assess the Cost Effectiveness of Restoration Outcomes in Four Institutional Contexts

At the national level, with a fixed amount of resources available for public investment in the restoration of biodiversity, it is difficult to prioritize alternative restoration projects. One way to do this is to assess the level of ecosystem services delivered by these projects and to compare them with their costs. The challenge is to derive a common unit of measurement for ecosystem services in order to compare projects which are carried out in different institutional contexts having different goals (application of environmental laws, management of natural reserves, etc.). This paper assesses the use of habitat equivalency analysis (HEA) as a tool to evaluate ecosystem services provided by restoration projects developed in different institutional contexts. This tool was initially developed to quantify the level of ecosystem services required to compensate for non-market impacts coming from accidental pollution in the US. In this paper, HEA is used to assess the cost effectiveness of several restoration projects in relation to different environmental policies, using case studies based in France. Four case studies were used: the creation of a market for wetlands, public acceptance of a port development project, the rehabilitation of marshes to mitigate nitrate loading to the sea, and the restoration of streams in a protected area. Our main conclusion is that HEA can provide a simple tool to clarify the objectives of restoration projects, to compare the cost and effectiveness of these projects, and to carry out trade-offs, without requiring significant amounts of human or technical resources.

[1]  Palmer Hough,et al.  Mitigation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act: where it comes from, what it means , 2009, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[2]  M. Wackernagel,et al.  Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: Economics from an ecological footprint perspective , 1997 .

[3]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Contingent valuation : a critical assessment , 1993 .

[4]  J. Kiesecker,et al.  Policy Development for Biodiversity Offsets: A Review of Offset Frameworks , 2010, Environmental management.

[5]  James Aronson,et al.  Restoring natural capital : science, business, and practice , 2007 .

[6]  F. Ramsey,et al.  THE MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF SAVING , 1928 .

[7]  Shanefrederick,et al.  Time Discounting and Time Preference : A Critical Review , 2022 .

[8]  David I. Stern,et al.  Limits to substitution and irreversibility in production and consumption: A neoclassical interpretation of ecological economics , 1997 .

[9]  Sean P. Powers,et al.  Scaling restoration to achieve quantitative enhancement of loon, seaduck, and other seabird populations , 2003 .

[10]  Steve Hampton,et al.  Exploring welfare implications of resource equivalency analysis in natural resource damage assessments , 2007 .

[11]  P Ekins,et al.  A Framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability , 2005 .

[12]  H. Daly,et al.  Natural Capital and Sustainable Development , 1992 .

[13]  Åsa Jansson,et al.  Accounting for ecosystem services as a way to understand the requirements for sustainable development , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  M. O. Hall,et al.  Evaluation of Seagrass Planting and Monitoring Techniques: Implications for Assessing Restoration Success and Habitat Equivalency , 2008 .

[15]  C. Kremen.  Nature and the Marketplace: Capturing the Value of Ecosystem Services.ByGeoffrey Heal.Washington (DC): Island Press. $50.00 (hardcover); $25.00 (paper). xv + 203 p; ill.; index. ISBN: 1–55963–795–1 (hc); 1–55963–796‐X (pb). 2000. , 2002 .

[16]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Assessing natural resource damages using environmental annuities , 1994 .

[17]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  Determinants of stated willingness to pay for public goods: A study in the headline method , 1994, Journal of risk and uncertainty.

[18]  A. Vatn,et al.  Choices without Prices without Apologies , 1994 .

[19]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[20]  H. Levrel,et al.  Compensatory Mitigation in Marine Ecosystems: Which Indicators for Assessing the "No Net Loss" Goal of Ecosystem Services and Ecological Functions? , 2012 .

[21]  Linda B. Burlington.  An Update on Implementation of Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration under OPA , 2002 .

[22]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions?: An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues , 1999 .

[23]  A. Rozan,et al.  Using an adapted HEP to assess environmental cost , 2011 .

[24]  K. Arrow.  Contingent Valuation of Nonuse Values: Observations and Questions , 1993 .

[25]  D. Pearce,et al.  Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability , 1993 .

[26]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Valuing Environmental Preferences , 2001 .

[27]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Empirical and public choice evidence for hyperbolic social discount rates and the implications for intergenerational discounting , 1995 .

[28]  H. Galbraith,et al.  Determining Ecological Equivalence in Service-to-Service Scaling of Salt Marsh Restoration , 2002, Environmental management.

[29]  H. Levrel,et al.  Selecting ecological indicators to compare maintenance costs related to the compensation of damaged ecosystem services , 2013 .

[30]  Brian Roach,et al.  Policy evaluation of natural resource injuries using habitat equivalency analysis , 2006 .

[31]  Applying Habitat Equivalency Analysis for Coral Reef Damage Assessment and Restoration , 2001 .

[32]  D. McCay,et al.  Habitat restoration as mitigation for lost production at multiple trophic levels , 2003 .

[33]  Gretchen C. Daily,et al.  Using return‐on‐investment to guide restoration: a case study from Hawaii , 2008 .

[34]  Richard B. Norgaard,et al.  Next, the value of God, and other reactions , 1998 .

[35]  J. Bennett,et al.  Factors that influence transaction costs in development offsets: Who bears what and why? , 2013 .

[36]  Frank Lupi,et al.  Landscape Equivalency Analysis: Methodology for Estimating Spatially Explicit Biodiversity Credits , 2005, Environmental management.

[37]  Kostas Bithas,et al.  Sustainability and externalities: Is the internalization of externalities a sufficient condition for sustainability? , 2011 .

[38]  Brian E. Julius,et al.  Integrating biology and economics in seagrass restoration: How much is enough and why? , 2000 .

[39]  Katherine A. Pease,et al.  RESTORATION-BASED COMPENSATION MEASURES IN NATURAL RESOURCE LIABILITY STATUTES , 1997 .

[40]  Joshua Lipton,et al.  Associating Ecosystem Service Losses with Indicators of Toxicity in Habitat Equivalency Analysis , 2005, Environmental management.

[41]  William H. Desvousges,et al.  The use of habitat equivalency analysis in natural resource damage assessments , 2004 .

[42]  T. Penn,et al.  Calculating Resource Restoration for an Oil Discharge in Lake Barre, Louisiana, USA , 2002, Environmental management.

[43]  S. Winterstein,et al.  GEOGRAPHICAL GENETICS: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS AND EMPIRICAL APPLICATIONS OF SPATIAL GENETIC DATA IN WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT , 2005 .

[44]  A. Vatn.  An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services , 2010 .

[45]  Marisa J. Mazzotta,et al.  Natural Resource Damage Assessment: The Role of Resource Restoration , 1994 .

[46]  M. Weitzman.  Why the Far-Distant Future Should Be Discounted at Its Lowest Possible Rate , 1998 .