The antral follicle count is a better marker than basal follicle-stimulating hormone for the selection of older patients with acceptable pregnancy prospects after in vitro fertilization.

[1]  M. Soules,et al.  Reproductive aging and variability in the ovarian antral follicle count: application in the clinical setting. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[2]  J. Habbema,et al.  Women older than 40 years of age and those with elevated follicle-stimulating hormone levels differ in poor response rate and embryo quality in in vitro fertilization. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[3]  P. Braude,et al.  Young age does not protect against the adverse effects of reduced ovarian reserve--an eight year study. , 2002, Human reproduction.

[4]  J. Habbema,et al.  Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve. , 2002, Fertility and sterility.

[5]  T. Toth,et al.  CLINICAL ASSISTED REPRODUCTION: Antral Follicle Assessment as a Tool for Predicting Outcome in IVF—Is it a Better Predictor than Age and FSH? , 2004, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[6]  P C Ho,et al.  The significance of the number of antral follicles prior to stimulation in predicting ovarian responses in an IVF programme. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[7]  M. Blankenstein,et al.  Basal follicle-stimulating hormone levels are of limited value in predicting ongoing pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization. , 2000, Fertility and sterility.

[8]  R. Winston,et al.  One thousand initiated cycles of in vitro fertilization in women > or = 40 years of age. , 1998, Fertility and sterility.

[9]  Y. Soong,et al.  Use of the antral follicle count to predict the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies. , 1998, Fertility and sterility.

[10]  A. V. van Heusden,et al.  Cumulative pregnancy rates and selective drop-out of patients in in-vitro fertilization treatment. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[11]  Joan K. Morris,et al.  Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment , 1996, The Lancet.

[12]  J. Habbema,et al.  Age-dependent decrease in embryo implantation rate after in vitro fertilization. , 1996, Fertility and sterility.

[13]  P. Royston,et al.  Cumulative conception and livebirth rates after in-vitro fertilisation , 1992, The Lancet.

[14]  J. Garcia,et al.  Effect of maternal age and number of in vitro fertilization procedures on pregnancy outcome. , 1989, Fertility and sterility.

[15]  C. West.  Age and infertility. , 1987, British medical journal.

[16]  A. Auyeung,et al.  Fertility Treatment in the Forty and Older Woman , 2004, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[17]  J. Habbema,et al.  Impact of repeated antral follicle counts on the prediction of poor ovarian response in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. , 2004, Fertility and sterility.

[18]  A. Kurjak,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrasonographic ovarian measurements and in vitro fertilization outcome are related to age. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[19]  F. Sharara,et al.  The effect of pituitary desensitization on ovarian volume measurements prior to in-vitro fertilization. , 1999, Human reproduction.

[20]  J. de Mouzon,et al.  In-vitro fertilization: influence of women's age on pregnancy rates. , 1990, Human reproduction.