Optimizing Families of Reconfigurable Aircraft for Multiple Missions

Aircraft with modular airframe components may offer significant flexibility in mission performance by enabling reconfiguration between sorties. This paper introduces an approach for optimizing a family of aircraft variants defined by a library of interchangeable components such as wings, tails, engines, and payloads. First, the combinatorial problemof composing interchangeable components into feasible aircraft variants and assigning the variants to missions is posed. Next, two methods are presented to determine optimal reconfigurable family designs. The methods are then applied to an example problem to define optimal families of modular unmanned aerial vehicles consisting of interchangeable wings and engines. The results indicate a rich trade space of family architectures and aircraft configurations that depends strongly on the type and diversity of the required missions.

[1]  Kikuo Fujita Product Variety Optimization , 2006 .

[2]  Joseph R. Marshall,et al.  Reconfigurable and Processing Building Blocks in Responsive Space , 2007 .

[3]  George A. Hazelrigg,et al.  A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design , 1998 .

[4]  Dave Deptula,et al.  Air Force Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Flight Plan 2009-2047 , 2009 .

[5]  Afreen Siddiqi,et al.  Modeling Methods and Conceptual Design Principles for Reconfigurable Systems , 2008 .

[6]  H. MyersR.,et al.  Response surface methodology: 19661988 , 1989 .

[7]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Commonality decisions in product family design , 2006 .

[8]  Joseph H. Saleh,et al.  Flexibility: a multi-disciplinary literature review and a research agenda for designing flexible engineering systems , 2009 .

[9]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Asessing Variable Levels of Platform Commonality Within a Product Family Using a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm , 2002 .

[10]  Steven B. Shooter,et al.  Platform-Based Design and Development: Current Trends and Needs in Industry , 2006, DAC 2006.

[11]  Nicholas Keith Borer Decision Making Strategies for Probabilistic Aerospace Systems Design , 2006 .

[12]  Matthew B. Parkinson,et al.  MULTICRITERIA OPTIMIZATION IN PRODUCT PLATFORM DESIGN , 1999, DAC 1999.

[13]  Armin P. Schulz,et al.  Design for changeability (DfC): Principles to enable changes in systems throughout their entire lifecycle , 2005 .

[14]  Werner J. Dahm Technology Horizons Vision for the Air Force During 2010-2030 (Video) , 2011 .

[15]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Product platform design and customization: Status and promise , 2004, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[16]  R. H. Myers,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[17]  Dava J Newman,et al.  Flexibility in system design and implications for aerospace systems. , 2003, Acta astronautica.

[18]  L. Lasdon,et al.  On a bicriterion formation of the problems of integrated system identification and system optimization , 1971 .

[19]  Jean-Didier Gayrard,et al.  Flexible Satellites: A New Challenge for the Communication Satellite Industry , 2007 .

[20]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Flexible and Reconfigurable Systems: Nomenclature and Review , 2007, DAC 2007.

[21]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  A genetic algorithm based method for product family design optimization , 2003 .

[22]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  An efficient decomposed multiobjective genetic algorithm for solving the joint product platform selection and product family design problem with generalized commonality , 2009 .

[23]  Zahed Siddique,et al.  Platform-Based Product Family Development , 2006 .

[24]  Eun Suk Suh,et al.  PRODUCT FAMILY AND PLATFORM PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION , 2003, DAC 2003.

[25]  Daniel P. Raymer,et al.  Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach , 1989 .

[26]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Designing a family of reconfigurable vehicles using multilevel multidisciplinary design optimization , 2009 .

[27]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Frameworks for Product Family Design and Development , 2007, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[28]  Karen Willcox,et al.  Simultaneous Optimization of a Multiple-Aircraft Family , 2003 .

[29]  Christopher A. Mattson,et al.  Identification of Modular Product Platforms and Modules that Account for Changing Consumer Needs , 2010 .

[30]  Karl Iagnemma,et al.  Reconfigurability in planetary surface vehicles : Modelling approaches and case study , 2006 .

[31]  John Funk,et al.  Future Military Common Aircraft Development Opportunities , 2006 .

[32]  Christopher A. Mattson,et al.  Accounting for Changing Customer Needs With s-Pareto Frontiers , 2010 .

[33]  Christopher A. Mattson,et al.  A design optimization strategy for creating devices that traverse the Pareto frontier over time , 2011 .

[34]  Andrew Olewnik,et al.  A decision support framework for flexible system design , 2006 .

[35]  Andrew S. Hahn,et al.  Vehicle Sketch Pad: a Parametric Geometry Modeler for Conceptual Aircraft Design , 2010 .

[36]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[37]  Afreen Siddiqi,et al.  Spare Parts Requirements for Space Missions with Reconfigurability and Commonality , 2007 .

[38]  Eric T. Martin,et al.  Multiobjective Aircraft Design to Investigate Potential Geometric Morphing Features , 2002 .

[39]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Product Family Commonality Selection Through Interactive Visualization , 2008, DAC 2008.

[40]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  From user requirements to commonality specifications: an integrated approach to product family design , 2010 .