Investigating heterogeneity in preferences for Mobility-as-a-Service plans through a latent class choice model

Abstract The past decade has seen the introduction and widespread availability of a number of new mobility services. These have created a transport environment that is complex to navigate for passengers. The Mobility as a Service (MaaS) concept aims to provide a solution, by offering a single digital interface through which users can plan journeys, pay for and access a variety of transport modes. MaaS can also provide users with various products, including pay-per-use access to transport modes as well as MaaS packages. The latter are bundled mobility services that combine a variety of transport modes and are offered to customers in a one-stop-shop manner. The objective of this paper is to examine individual preferences for MaaS packages, specifically addressing the question of preference heterogeneity. In doing so, a Latent Class Choice Model (LCCM) is developed, allowing us to reveal variations in individuals’ preferences. The LCCM is estimated using data from a MaaS-related market research carried out in Greater Manchester. The results imply significant heterogeneity with regards to preferences. Three latent classes emerged through the analysis, all with different MaaS package preferences and individual characteristics. Age, gender, income, education and current travel behaviour all play an important role in determining an individual’s propensity to purchase MaaS packages. The results can provide valuable insights into the types of people that should and should not be initially targeted with MaaS packages to maximise uptake.

[1]  J. Swait,et al.  The Influence of Task Complexity on Consumer Choice: A Latent Class Model of Decision Strategy Switching , 2001 .

[2]  Göran Smith,et al.  Mobility as a Service: Implications for future mainstream public transport , 2017 .

[3]  C. Cottrill.  MaaS surveillance: Privacy considerations in mobility as a service , 2020 .

[4]  Weibo Li,et al.  A Critical Review of New Mobility Services for Urban Transport , 2016 .

[5]  M. Kamargianni,et al.  The potential of mobility as a service bundles as a mobility management tool , 2019 .

[6]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Latent lifestyle preferences and household location decisions , 2007, J. Geogr. Syst..

[7]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Urban Demand Responsive Transport in the Mobility as a Service Ecosystem: Its Role and Potential Market Share , 2017 .

[8]  Goran Smith,et al.  Governing Mobility-as-a-Service: Insights from Sweden and Finland , 2018, The Governance of Smart Transportation Systems.

[9]  Junyi Shen.  Latent class model or mixed logit model? A comparison by transport mode choice data , 2009 .

[10]  J. Swait.  A structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross-sectional revealed preference choice data☆ , 1994 .

[11]  Melinda Matyas,et al.  Stated Preference Design for Exploring Demand for “Mobility as a Service” Plans , 2017 .

[12]  S. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Drivers and barriers in adopting Mobility as a Service (MaaS) – A latent class cluster analysis of attitudes , 2020, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[13]  D. Hensher,et al.  Towards a framework for Mobility-as-a-Service policies , 2020 .

[14]  Yanying Li,et al.  Mobility as a Service (MaaS): Challenges of Implementation and Policy Required , 2017 .

[15]  Thomas Adler,et al.  Latent Class Cluster Analysis of New England Driver Attitudes Toward Risky Driving: Is There a Rural Culture of Unsafe Driving Attitudes and Behavior? , 2011 .

[16]  Timo Liljamo,et al.  People’s current mobility costs and willingness to pay for Mobility as a Service offerings , 2020 .

[17]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Revealing additional dimensions of preference heterogeneity in a latent class mixed multinomial logit model , 2010 .

[18]  Otto Anker Nielsen,et al.  Latent lifestyle and mode choice decisions when travelling short distances , 2017 .

[19]  David A. Hensher,et al.  A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit , 2003 .

[20]  John M. Rose,et al.  Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives , 2008 .

[21]  Jan-Dirk Schmöcker,et al.  Innovation adoption modeling in transportation: New models and data , 2017 .

[22]  Jishnu Narayan,et al.  Mobility as a Service: A Critical Review of Definitions, Assessments of Schemes, and Key Challenges , 2017 .

[23]  I. Kougias,et al.  How Can Autonomous and Connected Vehicles, Electromobility, BRT, Hyperloop, Shared Use Mobility and Mobility-As-A-Service Shape Transport Futures for the Context of Smart Cities? , 2017 .

[24]  Gary J. Russell,et al.  A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure , 1989 .

[25]  R. Palacin,et al.  Children, Young people and Mobility as a Service: Opportunities and barriers for future mobility , 2020 .

[26]  P. Goodman,et al.  An examination of the effect of wage inequity in the hourly condition , 1968 .

[27]  Melinda Matyas.  Opportunities and barriers to multimodal cities: lessons learned from in-depth interviews about attitudes towards mobility as a service , 2020 .

[28]  Yale Z. Wong,et al.  Delivering mobility as a service (MaaS) through a broker/aggregator business model , 2020 .

[29]  Till Koglin,et al.  Development and implementation of Mobility-as-a-Service – A qualitative study of barriers and enabling factors , 2020 .

[30]  Hanna Ratilainen.  Mobility-as-a-Service: Exploring Consumer Preferences for MaaS Subscription Packages Using a Stated Choice Experiment , 2017 .

[31]  Chinh Q. Ho,et al.  Public preferences for mobility as a service: Insights from stated preference surveys , 2020, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[32]  Dominic Stead,et al.  Questioning mobility as a service: Unanticipated implications for society and governance , 2020, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[33]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  Bundling, pricing schemes and extra features preferences for mobility as a service: Sequential portfolio choice experiment , 2020, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[34]  H. Meurs,et al.  Innovative Business Architectures (BAs) for Mobility as a Service (MaaS) - Exploration, Assessment, and Categorization Using Operational MaaS Cases , 2018 .

[35]  Helena Strömberg,et al.  Implementing Mobility as a Service , 2015 .

[36]  Glenn Lyons,et al.  The importance of user perspective in the evolution of MaaS , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[37]  A. Polydoropoulou,et al.  Prototype business models for Mobility-as-a-Service , 2020 .

[38]  Chinh Q. Ho,et al.  Mobility as a service in community transport in Australia: Can it provide a sustainable future? , 2020 .

[39]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Future bus transport contracts under a mobility as a service (MaaS) regime in the digital age: Are they likely to change? , 2017 .

[40]  A. Daly,et al.  Handbook of Choice Modelling , 2014 .

[41]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Accounting for attribute non-attendance and common-metric aggregation in a probabilistic decision process mixed multinomial logit model: a warning on potential confounding , 2013 .

[42]  MariAnne Karlsson,et al.  The topology of Mobility as a Service: A tool for understanding effects on business and society, user behavior, and technical requirements , 2017 .

[43]  Yale Z. Wong,et al.  Prospects for switching out of conventional transport services to mobility as a service subscription plans – A stated choice study , 2017 .

[44]  Akshay Vij,et al.  Incorporating the influence of latent modal preferences on travel mode choice behavior , 2013 .

[45]  K. Geurs,et al.  On the likelihood of using Mobility-as-a-Service: A case study on innovative mobility services among residents in the Netherlands , 2019 .

[46]  Alexander Paulsson,et al.  Public transport regimes and mobility as a service: Governance approaches in Amsterdam, Birmingham, and Helsinki , 2019 .

[47]  S. Heikkilä.  Mobility as a Service - A Proposal for Action for the Public Administration, Case Helsinki , 2014 .

[48]  Jana L. Sochor,et al.  Public–private innovation: barriers in the case of mobility as a service in West Sweden , 2019 .

[49]  Takayuki Morikawa,et al.  REVIEW AND PERSPECTIVE OF INCORPORATING STATED PREFERENCE DATA IN TRAVEL DEMAND ANALYSIS , 1990 .