A hydraulic mixing-cell method to quantify the groundwater component of streamflow within spatially distributed fully integrated surface water-groundwater flow models

The complexity of available hydrological models continues to increase, with fully integrated surface water-groundwater flow and transport models now available. Nevertheless, an accurate quantification of streamflow generation mechanisms within these models is not yet possible. For example, such models do not report the groundwater component of streamflow at a particular point along the stream. Instead, the groundwater component of streamflow is approximated either from tracer transport simulations or by the sum of exchange fluxes between the surface and the subsurface along the river. In this study, a hydraulic mixing-cell (HMC) method is developed and tested that allows to accurately determine the groundwater component of streamflow by using only the flow solution from fully integrated surface water-groundwater flow models. By using the HMC method, the groundwater component of streamflow can be extracted accurately at any point along a stream provided the subsurface/surface exchanges along the stream are calculated by the model. A key advantage of the HMC method is that only hydraulic information is used, thus the simulation of tracer transport is not required. Two numerical experiments are presented, the first to test the HMC method and the second to demonstrate that it quantifies the groundwater component of streamflow accurately.

[1]  J. McDonnell,et al.  A review and evaluation of catchment transit time modeling , 2006 .

[2]  R. Carsel,et al.  Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics , 1988 .

[3]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Quantifying the relative contributions of riparian and hillslope zones to catchment runoff , 2003 .

[4]  Young-Jin Park,et al.  An assessment of the tracer‐based approach to quantifying groundwater contributions to streamflow , 2006 .

[5]  Valentina Krysanova,et al.  Integrating groundwater dynamics in regional hydrological modelling , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  Warrick R. Dawes,et al.  Prioritisation approach for estimating the biophysical impacts of land-use change on stream flow and salt export at a catchment scale , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  Peter A. Forsyth,et al.  Flow and transport in fractured tuff at Yucca Mountain: numerical experiments on fast preferential flow mechanisms , 2000 .

[8]  P. Brunner,et al.  Solute dynamics during bank storage flows and implications for chemical base flow separation , 2010 .

[9]  C. Simmons,et al.  Hydrogeologic controls on disconnection between surface water and groundwater , 2009 .

[10]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Virtual experiments: a new approach for improving process conceptualization in hillslope hydrology , 2004 .

[11]  Thomas C. Winter,et al.  Relation of streams, lakes, and wetlands to groundwater flow systems , 1999 .

[12]  Stephen J. Burges,et al.  A hypothetical reality of Tarrawarra‐like hydrologic response , 2009 .

[13]  K. Loague,et al.  Hydrologic‐Response simulations for the R‐5 catchment with a comprehensive physics‐based model , 2001 .

[14]  M. Sklash,et al.  The Role Of Groundwater In Storm Runoff , 1979 .

[15]  M. Sophocleous.  Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science , 2002 .

[16]  J. T. Croton,et al.  WEC-C: a distributed, deterministic catchment model -- theory, formulation and testing , 2001, Environ. Model. Softw..

[17]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[18]  John D. Hewlett,et al.  Non-Point and Diffused Water Sources: A Variable Source Area Problem , 1975 .

[19]  Craig T. Simmons,et al.  Spatial and temporal aspects of the transition from connection to disconnection between rivers, lakes and groundwater , 2009 .

[20]  D. A. Woolhiser,et al.  Estimation of spatial recharge distribution using environmental isotopes and hydrochemical data, I. Mathematical model and application to synthetic data , 1988 .

[21]  E. Simpson,et al.  Groundwater residence times and recharge rates using a discrete-state compartment model and 14C data , 1984 .

[22]  Tom G. Chapman,et al.  Modelling stream recession flows , 2003, Environ. Model. Softw..

[23]  V. T. Chow.  Open-channel hydraulics , 1959 .

[24]  Benjamin B. Mirus,et al.  First‐order exchange coefficient coupling for simulating surface water–groundwater interactions: parameter sensitivity and consistency with a physics‐based approach , 2009 .

[25]  K. Eckhardt.  A comparison of baseflow indices, which were calculated with seven different baseflow separation methods , 2008 .

[26]  Davide Maggi,et al.  Coupled SVAT-groundwater model for water resources simulation in irrigated alluvial plains , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[27]  David R. Richards,et al.  A Parallel Software Development for Watershed Simulations , 2005, International Conference on Computational Science.

[28]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  A new time‐space accounting scheme to predict stream water residence time and hydrograph source components at the watershed scale , 2009 .

[29]  P. Huyakorn,et al.  A fully coupled physically-based spatially-distributed model for evaluating surface/subsurface flow , 2004 .

[30]  R. Maxwell,et al.  Integrated surface-groundwater flow modeling: A free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model , 2006 .