Utilizing Facebook pages of the political parties to automatically predict the political orientation of Facebook users

Purpose Social network sites have been widely adopted by politicians in the last election campaigns. To increase the effectiveness of these campaigns the potential electorate is to be identified, as targeted ads are much more effective than non-targeted ads. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to propose and implement a new methodology for automatic prediction of political orientation of users on social network sites by comparison to texts from the overtly political parties’ pages. Design/methodology/approach To this end, textual information on personal users’ pages is used as a source of statistical features. The authors apply automatic text categorization algorithms to distinguish between texts of users from different political wings. However, these algorithms require a set of manually labeled texts for training, which is typically unavailable in real life situations. To overcome this limitation the authors propose to use texts available on various political parties’ pages on a social network site to train the classifier. The political leaning of these texts is determined by the political affiliation of the corresponding parties. The classifier learned on such overtly political texts is then applied on the personal user pages to predict their political orientation. To assess the validity and effectiveness of the proposed methodology two corpora were constructed: personal Facebook pages of 450 Israeli citizens, and political parties Facebook pages of the nine prominent Israeli parties. Findings The authors found that when a political tendency classifier is trained and tested on data in the same corpus, accuracy is very high. More significantly, training on manifestly political texts (political party Facebook pages) yields classifiers which can be used to classify non-political personal Facebook pages with fair accuracy. Social implications Previous studies have shown that targeted ads are more effective than non-targeted ads leading to substantial saving in the advertising budget. Therefore, the approach for automatic determining the political orientation of users on social network sites might be adopted for targeting political messages, especially during election campaigns. Originality/value This paper proposes and implements a new approach for automatic cross-corpora identification of political bias of user profiles on social network. This suggests that individuals’ political tendencies can be identified without recourse to any tagged personal data. In addition, the authors use learned classifiers to determine which self-identified centrists lean left or right and which voters are likely to switch allegiance in subsequent elections.

[1]  D. Agrawal,et al.  Information diffusion in social networks: observing and affecting what society cares about , 2011, CIKM '11.

[2]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[3]  Miles James Efron Cultural Orientation: Classifying Subjective Documents by Cociation Analysis , 2004, AAAI Technical Report.

[4]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Citizen sensor data mining, social media analytics and development centric web applications , 2011, WWW.

[5]  Anne M. Brumbaugh,et al.  Nontarget Markets and Viewer Distinctiveness: The Impact of Target Marketing on Advertising Attitudes , 2000 .

[6]  Stephen Wan,et al.  Listening to the community: social media monitoring tasks for improving government services , 2011, CHI EA '11.

[7]  M. Laver,et al.  Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[8]  Juho Pesonen,et al.  Tourism Marketing in Facebook: Comparing Rural Tourism SME's and Larger Tourism Companies in Finland , 2011, ENTER.

[9]  Moshe Koppel,et al.  Determining an author's native language by mining a text for errors , 2005, KDD '05.

[10]  N. Ellison,et al.  Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis , 2008 .

[11]  Young Min Baek,et al.  Political mobilization through social network sites: The mobilizing power of political messages received from SNS friends , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  David Mark Horowitz The New Community Rules: Marketing on the Social Web , 2010 .

[13]  John D. Burger,et al.  Discriminating Gender on Twitter , 2011, EMNLP.

[14]  Christine B. Williams,et al.  Web 2.0 and Politics: The 2008 U.S. Presidential Election and an E-Politics Research Agenda , 2010, MIS Q..

[15]  Shlomo Argamon,et al.  Automatically profiling the author of an anonymous text , 2009, CACM.

[16]  Wei-Hao Lin,et al.  Which Side are You on? Identifying Perspectives at the Document and Sentence Levels , 2006, CoNLL.

[17]  Divyakant Agrawal,et al.  Information diffusion in social networks , 2011, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[18]  Sarah Steiner Gender, Genre, and Writing Style in Formal Written Texts , 2014 .

[19]  Sara Rosenthal,et al.  Age Prediction in Blogs: A Study of Style, Content, and Online Behavior in Pre- and Post-Social Media Generations , 2011, ACL.

[20]  Christine B. Williams,et al.  Social Networks in Political Campaigns: Facebook and Congressional Elections 2006, 2008 , 2009 .

[21]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  Social Media Analytics and Intelligence , 2010, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[22]  Shlomo Argamon,et al.  Effects of Age and Gender on Blogging , 2006, AAAI Spring Symposium: Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs.

[23]  Yonghwan Kim,et al.  The contribution of social network sites to exposure to political difference: The relationships among SNSs, online political messaging, and exposure to cross-cutting perspectives , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[25]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment , 2010, ICWSM.

[26]  Katja Filippova,et al.  User Demographics and Language in an Implicit Social Network , 2012, EMNLP.

[27]  Jahna Otterbacher,et al.  Inferring gender of movie reviewers: exploiting writing style, content and metadata , 2010, CIKM.

[28]  Samuel D. Gosling,et al.  Manifestations of Personality in Online Social Networks: Self-Reported Facebook-Related Behaviors and Observable Profile Information , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[29]  Craig Ross,et al.  Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  Christopher Chan,et al.  Using online advertising to increase the impact of a Library Facebook page , 2011 .

[31]  Gregory Grefenstette,et al.  Coupling Niche Browsers and Affect Analysis for an Opinion Mining Application , 2004, RIAO.

[32]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Psychological aspects of natural language. use: our words, our selves. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[33]  Girish J. Gulati,et al.  Gulati elections of 2006 and 2008 Social networks in political campaigns : Facebook and the congressional , 2013 .

[34]  J. Platt Sequential Minimal Optimization : A Fast Algorithm for Training Support Vector Machines , 1998 .

[35]  Daniel Gillick,et al.  Can conversational word usage be used to predict speaker demographics? , 2010, INTERSPEECH.

[36]  Anita Sharma,et al.  Personality and Patterns of Facebook Usage , 2016 .

[37]  Daniel Kreiss,et al.  Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle , 2016, New Media Soc..

[38]  Stefan Stieglitz,et al.  Social media and political communication: a social media analytics framework , 2012, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[39]  Daniel W. Drezner,et al.  The power and politics of blogs , 2007 .

[40]  Anders Olof Larsson,et al.  Who tweets? tracking microblogging use in the 2010 swedish election campaign , 2011, ECIS.

[41]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[42]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Social capital on facebook: differentiating uses and users , 2011, CHI.

[43]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom , 2006 .

[44]  Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou,et al.  Automatic Detection of Tags for Political Blogs , 2010, HLT-NAACL 2010.

[45]  C. Sunstein The Law of Group Polarization , 1999, How Change Happens.

[46]  Sounman Hong,et al.  Does the early bird move the polls?: the use of the social media tool 'Twitter' by U.S. politicians and its impact on public opinion , 2011, dg.o '11.

[47]  Rob Malouf,et al.  A Preliminary Investigation into Sentiment Analysis of Informal Political Discourse , 2006, AAAI Spring Symposium: Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs.

[48]  David Yarowsky,et al.  Classifying latent user attributes in twitter , 2010, SMUC '10.

[49]  Adrian Popescu,et al.  Mining User Home Location and Gender from Flickr Tags , 2010, ICWSM.

[50]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Predicting the Political Alignment of Twitter Users , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[51]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Social media analytics: tracking, modeling and predicting the flow of information through networks , 2011, WWW.

[52]  T. Graepel,et al.  Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  Stefan Kaufmann,et al.  Classifying Party Affiliation from Political Speech , 2008 .

[54]  G. Enli,et al.  PERSONALIZED CAMPAIGNS IN PARTY-CENTRED POLITICS , 2013 .

[55]  Devin Gaffney #iranElection: quantifying online activism , 2010 .

[56]  Tamar Weinberg,et al.  The New Community Rules - Marketing on the Social Web , 2009 .