Carer preferences for home support services in later stage dementia

ABSTRACT Objectives: To examine the relative importance of different home support attributes from the perspective of carers of people with later-stage dementia. Method: Preferences from 100 carers, recruited through carers’ organisations, were assessed with a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) survey, administered online and by paper questionnaire. Attributes were informed by an evidence synthesis and lay consultations. A conditional logit model was used to estimate preference weights for the attributes within a home support ‘package’. Results: The most preferred attributes were ‘respite care, available regularly to fit your needs’ (coefficient 1.29, p = < 0.001) and ‘home care provided regularly for as long as needed’ (coefficient 0.93, p = < 0.001). Cost had a significant effect with lower cost packages preferred. Findings were similar regardless of the method of administration, with respite care considered to be the most important attribute for all carers. Carers reported that completing the DCE had been a positive experience; however, feedback was mixed overall. Conclusions: These carer preferences concur with emerging evidence on home support interventions for dementia. Respite care, home care and training on managing difficulties provided at home are important components. Carers’ preferences revealed the daily challenges of caring for individuals with later stage dementia and the need for tailored and specialised home support.

[1]  D. Challis,et al.  People with dementia and carer preferences for home support services in early-stage dementia , 2018, Aging & mental health.

[2]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Effective public involvement in the HoST-D Programme for dementia home care support: From proposal and design to methods of data collection (innovative practice) , 2019, Dementia.

[3]  D. Jolley,et al.  Overview of systematic reviews: Effective home support in dementia care, components and impacts—Stage 1, psychosocial interventions for dementia , 2017, Journal of advanced nursing.

[4]  D. Challis,et al.  A discrete choice experiment to explore carer preferences , 2017 .

[5]  A. Culyer,et al.  Discrete Choice Experiments , 2014 .

[6]  D. Jolley,et al.  A protocol for a systematic review of effective home support to people with dementia and their carers: components and impacts. , 2016, Journal of advanced nursing.

[7]  C. Stirling,et al.  Why carers use adult day respite: a mixed method case study , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.

[8]  K. Soares-Weiser,et al.  Respite care for people with dementia and their carers. , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[9]  J. Billeter Dementia - A state of the nation report on dementia care and support in England , 2014 .

[10]  Martin Knapp,et al.  Cost effectiveness of a manual based coping strategy programme in promoting the mental health of family carers of people with dementia (the START (STrAtegies for RelaTives) study): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial , 2013, BMJ.

[11]  J. Keady,et al.  Psychological interventions for carers of people with dementia: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence , 2013 .

[12]  C. Glendinning,et al.  A road less rocky : supporting carers of people with dementia , 2013 .

[13]  G. Livingston,et al.  Do changes in coping style explain the effectiveness of interventions for psychological morbidity in family carers of people with dementia? A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2012, International Psychogeriatrics.

[14]  Joanna Coast,et al.  Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations. , 2012, Health economics.

[15]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and service users' perceptions of early, well-resourced communication therapy following a stroke: a randomised controlled trial (the ACT NoW Study). , 2012, Health technology assessment.

[16]  Eun-Young Yoo,et al.  A systematic review of the effects of occupational therapy for persons with dementia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2012, NeuroRehabilitation.

[17]  J. Louviere,et al.  Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[18]  Lois A. Ritter,et al.  Conducting Online Surveys , 2011 .

[19]  R. Romero-Moreno,et al.  Mechanisms of action of a psychological intervention for dementia caregivers: effects of behavioral activation and modification of dysfunctional thoughts , 2010, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[20]  Jonathan M. Evans,et al.  Dementia care , 1998, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[21]  Bob Woods,et al.  Nonpharmacological Therapies in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review of Efficacy , 2010, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders.

[22]  X. Koolman,et al.  Preferences for long-term care services: willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[23]  J. Guevara,et al.  Nonpharmacological intervention for agitation in dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2009, Aging & mental health.

[24]  Housing Lin,et al.  Living Well with Dementia: A National Dementia Strategy , 2009 .

[25]  Suzanne Martin,et al.  Smart home technologies for health and social care support. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[26]  Suzanne Phelps,et al.  An evaluation of the needs and service usage of family carers of people with dementia , 2008 .

[27]  Rob Jones,et al.  An evaluation of a specialist multiagency home support service for older people with dementia using qualitative methods , 2008, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.

[28]  Mandy Ryan,et al.  Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care , 2008 .

[29]  I. Hossain,et al.  The provision of informal care in terminal illness: An analysis of carers? needs using a discrete choice experiment , 2007 .

[30]  S. Bryan,et al.  Do patients value continuity of care in general practice? An investigation using stated preference discrete choice experiments , 2007, Journal of health services research & policy.

[31]  D. gallagher-Thompson,et al.  Evidence-based psychological treatments for distress in family caregivers of older adults. , 2007, Psychology and aging.

[32]  Joanna Coast,et al.  Developing attributes and levels for discrete choice experiments using qualitative methods , 2007, Journal of health services research & policy.

[33]  Susan M McCurry,et al.  Evidence-Based Interventions to Improve Quality of Life for Individuals with Dementia. , 2007, Alzheimer's care today.

[34]  Liat Ayalon,et al.  Effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions for the management of neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with dementia: a systematic review. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[35]  Ann Netten,et al.  Using discrete choice experiments to estimate a preference-based measure of outcome--an application to social care for older people. , 2006, Journal of health economics.

[36]  Nicholas W. Jankowski,et al.  Conducting Online Surveys , 2006 .

[37]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer , 2005 .

[38]  Michael Hirst,et al.  Carer distress: a prospective, population-based study. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[39]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: List of tables , 2005 .

[40]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: List of tables , 2005 .

[41]  C. Glendinning,et al.  Carers' aspirations and decisions around work and retirement , 2005 .

[42]  M. Schwarzinger,et al.  Dementia Care in 9 OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis , 2004 .

[43]  M. Cameron,et al.  Respite care for people with dementia and their carers. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[44]  R. Woods,et al.  Support in the community for people with dementia and their carers: a comparative outcome study of specialist mental health service interventions , 2003, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[45]  J. Kendall,et al.  Movement and change: independent sector domiciliary care providers between 1995 and 1999. , 2001, Health & social care in the community.

[46]  W. Wills,et al.  Understanding the Needs of the Family Carers of People with Dementia , 2001 .

[47]  A Ludbrook,et al.  Use of discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences , 2001, Quality in health care : QHC.

[48]  M Neal,et al.  Validation therapy for dementia. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[49]  D. Hermans,et al.  Subjective barriers to prevent wandering of cognitively impaired people. , 2001, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[50]  L. Curtice,et al.  The domiciliary care market in Scotland: quasi-markets revisited. , 2000, Health & social care in the community.

[51]  B. Davies,et al.  Equity and Efficiency Policy in Community Care: Needs, Service Productivities, Efficiencies and Their Implications , 2000 .

[52]  J. Moriarty,et al.  Outcome of referral to social services departments for people with cognitive impairment , 2000, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[53]  M Orrell,et al.  Reality orientation for dementia: a systematic review of the evidence of effectiveness from randomized controlled trials. , 2000, The Gerontologist.

[54]  A. Bennett,et al.  An evaluation of an augmented domiciliary service to older people with dementia and their carers , 1998 .

[55]  Paul Kind,et al.  A social tariff for EuroQol: results from a UK general population survey , 1995 .

[56]  R. Montgomery,et al.  The Effects of Respite on Caregivers of Alzheimer's Patients: One-Year Evaluation of the Michigan Model Respite Programs , 1993 .

[57]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice , 1990 .

[58]  A. Williams EuroQol : a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life , 1990 .

[59]  A. Kasuya EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. , 1990, Health policy.

[60]  A. Tulloch FAMILIES, SERVICES AND CONFUSION IN OLD AGE , 1989 .

[61]  M. Lawton,et al.  A controlled study of respite service for caregivers of Alzheimer's patients. , 1989, The Gerontologist.

[62]  C. L. Hudiburg Reality orientation. , 1978, Delaware medical journal.

[63]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .