Towards a science of informed matter.

Over the last couple of decades, a call has begun to resound in a number of distinct fields of inquiry for a reattachment of form to matter, for an understanding of 'information' as inherently embodied, or, as Jean-Marie Lehn calls it, for a "science of informed matter." We hear this call most clearly in chemistry, in cognitive science, in molecular computation, and in robotics-all fields looking to biological processes to ground a new epistemology. The departure from the values of a more traditional epistemological culture can be seen most clearly in changing representations of biological development. Where for many years now, biological discourse has accepted a sharp distinction (borrowed directly from classical computer science) between information and matter, software and hardware, data and program, encoding and enactment, a new discourse has now begun to emerge in which these distinctions have little meaning. Perhaps ironically, much of this shift depends on drawing inspiration from just those biological processes which the discourse of disembodied information was intended to describe.

[1]  Amir Pnueli,et al.  On the Development of Reactive Systems , 1989, Logics and Models of Concurrent Systems.

[2]  Jean-Marie Lehn,et al.  Perspectives in Supramolecular Chemistry—From Molecular Recognition towards Molecular Information Processing and Self‐Organization , 1990 .

[3]  H. L. Resnikoff The illusion of reality , 1988 .

[4]  Scott A. Smolka,et al.  Interactive Computation: The New Paradigm , 2006 .

[5]  I. H. Öğüş,et al.  NATO ASI Series , 1997 .

[6]  R A Brooks,et al.  New Approaches to Robotics , 1991, Science.

[7]  Jean-Marie Lehn,et al.  Supramolecular chemistry: from molecular information towards self-organization and complex matter , 2004 .

[8]  A. Whitehead Process and reality : an essay in cosmology , 1978 .

[9]  S. Brakmann On the generation of information as motive power for molecular evolution. , 1997, Biophysical chemistry.

[10]  Peter Wegner,et al.  Interaction as a basis for empirical computer science , 1995, CSUR.

[11]  R. Pfeifer,et al.  Self-Organization, Embodiment, and Biologically Inspired Robotics , 2007, Science.

[12]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Dynamical blueprints: exploiting levels of system-environment interaction , 2007, GECCO '07.

[13]  S. Kraemer Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Gregory Bateson , 1993, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[14]  Jean-Marie Lehn,et al.  From supramolecular chemistry towards constitutional dynamic chemistry and adaptive chemistry. , 2007, Chemical Society reviews.

[15]  Robin Milner Turing, Computing and Communication , 2006 .

[16]  David Harel,et al.  Beyond the Gene , 2007, PloS one.

[17]  Miguel A L Nicolelis Mind in motion. , 2012, Scientific American.

[18]  E. Thelen,et al.  The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  Genevieve Lloyd,et al.  THE MAN OF REASON , 1979 .

[20]  E. Jablonka Information: Its Interpretation, Its Inheritance, and Its Sharing , 2002, Philosophia Scientiæ.

[21]  Farhad Arbab,et al.  Computing and Interaction , 2006 .

[22]  Lynn Andrea Stein Interaction, Computation, and Education , 2006 .