Theory of Mind in Human-Robot-Communication: Appreciated or not?

Social robots play a more and more important role in our society. For better acceptance and more fluent interactions between humans and robots it is generally assumed that implementing human-like cognitive functions within robots is helpful. A between-subjects experiment (N = 40) was conducted to in-vestigate whether implementing a theory of mind within a humanoid robot will lead to higher acceptance of the robot. Theory of mind is considered one of the most essential prerequisites for interpersonal interac-tion in human-human interaction. Researchers argue that theory of mind enhanced robots capturing other person’s goals, beliefs, feelings, and intentions will perform significantly better. Subjects were presented videos of interactions with a humanoid robot that either possessed or did not possess theory of mind abili-ties. Results indicate subjects acknowledged the fact that a robot showing theory of mind abilities such as perspective taking followed its own intentions; that it understood the way another person behaves; that it was aware of another person’s thoughts, beliefs, and feelings. Accordingly, the robot was rated more sym-pathetic and higher on social attractiveness but not on task attractiveness. Implications of these results as well as limitations are discussed.

[1]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[2]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Living with a robot companion: empirical study on the interaction with an artificial health advisor , 2011, ICMI '11.

[3]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  Media Equation Revisited: Do Users Show Polite Reactions towards an Embodied Agent? , 2009, IVA.

[4]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Theory of Mind for a Humanoid Robot , 2002, Auton. Robots.

[6]  C. Frith,et al.  Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’ , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  David V. Pynadath,et al.  Modeling influence and theory of mind , 2022 .

[8]  S. Gelman,et al.  Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity In Cognition And Culture , 1994 .

[9]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  THE EFFECT OF INTERACTION BEHAVIOR ON SOURCE CREDIBILITY, HOMOPHILY, AND INTERPERSONAL ATTRACTION , 1974 .

[10]  Cory D. Kidd,et al.  Sociable robots : the role of presence and task in human-robot interaction , 2003 .

[11]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[12]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Toward sociable robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[13]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  It doesn't matter what you are! Comparing interacting with an autonomous virtual person with interacting with a virtually represented human , 2009 .

[14]  D. Wegner,et al.  Causes and consequences of mind perception , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  "It doesn't matter what you are!" Explaining social effects of agents and avatars , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  David Premack,et al.  Origins of human social competence. , 1995 .

[17]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  A. Leslie Mapping the mind: ToMM, ToBY, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity , 1994 .

[19]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Foundations for a theory of mind for a humanoid robot , 2001 .

[20]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Infant-like Social Interactions between a Robot and a Human Caregiver , 2000, Adapt. Behav..

[21]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[22]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. , 2007, Psychological review.

[23]  Christopher E. Peters Designing Synthetic Memory Systems for Supporting Autonomous Embodied Agent Behaviour , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[24]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Theory of Mind as a Theoretical Prerequisite to Model Communication with Virtual Humans , 2006, ZiF Workshop.

[25]  Aaron Powers,et al.  Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[26]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  Smile and the world will smile with you - The effects of a virtual agent's smile on users' evaluation and behavior , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  付伶俐 打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .

[28]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Perspective-Taking in Communication: Representations of Others' Knowledge in Reference , 1991 .

[29]  M. Bradley,et al.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. , 1994, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[30]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Does Humanity Matter? Analyzing the Importance of Social Cues and Perceived Agency of a Computer System for the Emergence of Social Reactions during Human-Computer Interaction , 2012, Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[31]  C. Breazeal Towards Sociable Robots , 2002 .

[32]  S. Baron-Cohen Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind , 1997 .

[33]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[34]  Mark H. Davis Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. , 1983 .