Molecular evolution and tempo of amplification of human LINE-1 retrotransposons since the origin of primates.

We investigated the evolution of the families of LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposons that have amplified in the human lineage since the origin of primates. We identified two phases in the evolution of L1. From approximately 70 million years ago (Mya) until approximately 40 Mya, three distinct L1 lineages were simultaneously active in the genome of ancestral primates. In contrast, during the last 40 million years (Myr), i.e., during the evolution of anthropoid primates, a single lineage of families has evolved and amplified. We found that novel (i.e., unrelated) regulatory regions (5'UTR) have been frequently recruited during the evolution of L1, whereas the two open-reading frames (ORF1 and ORF2) have remained relatively conserved. We found that L1 families coexisted and formed independently evolving L1 lineages only when they had different 5'UTRs. We propose that L1 families with different 5'UTR can coexist because they don't rely on the same host-encoded factors for their transcription and therefore do not compete with each other. The most prolific L1 families (families L1PA8 to L1PA3) amplified between 40 and 12 Mya. This period of high activity corresponds to an episode of adaptive evolution in a segment of ORF1. The correlation between the high activity of L1 families and adaptive evolution could result from the coevolution of L1 and a host-encoded repressor of L1 activity.

[1]  J. V. Moran,et al.  Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. , 2001, Nature.

[2]  N. C. Casavant,et al.  Two persistent LINE-1 lineages in Peromyscus have unequal rates of evolution. , 1996, Genetics.

[3]  G. Swergold,et al.  Tracing the LINEs of human evolution , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  J. V. Moran,et al.  A YY1-binding site is required for accurate human LINE-1 transcription initiation. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  S. Boissinot,et al.  Different Rates of LINE-1 (L1) Retrotransposon Amplification and Evolution in New World Monkeys , 2003, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[6]  F. Bushman,et al.  Nucleic Acid Chaperone Activity of the ORF1 Protein from the Mouse LINE-1 Retrotransposon , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[7]  C. Hutchison,et al.  Conservation throughout mammalia and extensive protein-encoding capacity of the highly repeated DNA long interspersed sequence one. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  Jef D Boeke,et al.  Human L1 Retrotransposon Encodes a Conserved Endonuclease Required for Retrotransposition , 1996, Cell.

[9]  F. Robb,et al.  The structure of the regulatory region of the rat L1 (L1Rn, long interspersed repeated) DNA family of transposable elements. , 1988, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  E. Eichler,et al.  Analysis of primate genomic variation reveals a repeat-driven expansion of the human genome. , 2003, Genome research.

[11]  M. Batzer,et al.  Mammalian retroelements. , 2002, Genome research.

[12]  Yoshiyuki Sakaki,et al.  Whole-genome screening indicates a possible burst of formation of processed pseudogenes and Alu repeats by particular L1 subfamilies in ancestral primates , 2003, Genome Biology.

[13]  C. Hutchison,et al.  Rodent L1 evolution has been driven by a single dominant lineage that has repeatedly acquired new transcriptional regulatory sequences. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.

[14]  Jef D Boeke,et al.  Human L1 element target‐primed reverse transcription in vitro , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[15]  M. Kimura A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences , 1980, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[16]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software , 2001, Bioinform..

[17]  A. Furano,et al.  Amplification of an ancestral mammalian L1 family of long interspersed repeated DNA occurred just before the murine radiation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  R. E. Thayer,et al.  Binding of the ubiquitous nuclear transcription factor YY1 to a cis regulatory sequence in the human LINE-1 transposable element. , 1993, Human molecular genetics.

[19]  H. Kazazian Mobile Elements: Drivers of Genome Evolution , 2004, Science.

[20]  A. Smit,et al.  Ancestral, mammalian-wide subfamilies of LINE-1 repetitive sequences. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  E. Ostertag,et al.  A novel active L1 retrotransposon subfamily in the mouse. , 2001, Genome research.

[22]  T. Heidmann,et al.  Members of the SRY family regulate the human LINE retrotransposons. , 2000, Nucleic acids research.

[23]  Z. Yang,et al.  Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[24]  M. Hattori,et al.  Identification of an internal cis-element essential for the human L1 transcription and a nuclear factor(s) binding to the element. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  S. Martin,et al.  Recombination between subtypes creates a mosaic lineage of LINE-1 that is expressed and actively retrotransposing in the mouse genome. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  P. Chevret,et al.  Amplification of the ancient murine Lx family of long interspersed repeated DNA occurred during the murine radiation , 2004, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[27]  N. C. Casavant,et al.  The dynamics of murine LINE-1 subfamily amplification. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  C. Hutchison,et al.  L1 A-monomer tandem arrays have expanded during the course of mouse L1 evolution. , 1993, Molecular biology and evolution.

[29]  A. Furano,et al.  Recombination creates novel L1 (LINE-1) elements in Rattus norvegicus. , 1997, Genetics.

[30]  G. Swergold Identification, characterization, and cell specificity of a human LINE-1 promoter , 1990, Molecular and cellular biology.

[31]  J. Boeke,et al.  Reverse transcriptase encoded by a human transposable element. , 1991, Science.

[32]  T. Eickbush,et al.  RNA template requirements for target DNA-primed reverse transcription by the R2 retrotransposable element , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[33]  N. Goldman,et al.  Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. , 2000, Genetics.

[34]  P. Wincker,et al.  Unrelated sequences at the 5' end of mouse LINE-1 repeated elements define two distinct subfamilies. , 1987, Nucleic acids research.

[35]  G. Moore,et al.  Molecular Evolution in the Descent of Man , 1971, Nature.

[36]  S. Boissinot,et al.  Selection against deleterious LINE-1-containing loci in the human lineage. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[37]  C. Hutchison,et al.  The Evolution of Modern Lineages of Mouse L1 Elements , 2001, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[38]  E. Holmes,et al.  A likelihood method for the detection of selection and recombination using nucleotide sequences. , 1997, Molecular biology and evolution.

[39]  N. Saitou,et al.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[40]  C. Groves,et al.  Toward a phylogenetic classification of Primates based on DNA evidence complemented by fossil evidence. , 1998, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[41]  T. Eickbush,et al.  Reverse transcription of R2Bm RNA is primed by a nick at the chromosomal target site: A mechanism for non-LTR retrotransposition , 1993, Cell.

[42]  A. Smit,et al.  The origin of interspersed repeats in the human genome. , 1996, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[43]  C. Hutchison,et al.  The F-type 5' motif of mouse L1 elements: a major class of L1 termini similar to the A-type in organization but unrelated in sequence. , 1988, Nucleic acids research.

[44]  G. Cuny,et al.  A new 5' sequence associated with mouse L1 elements is representative of a major class of L1 termini. , 1992, Molecular biology and evolution.

[45]  W. Miller,et al.  The 5' ends of LINE1 repeats in rabbit DNA define subfamilies and reveal a short sequence conserved between rabbits and humans. , 1992, Genomics.

[46]  M. Speek Antisense Promoter of Human L1 Retrotransposon Drives Transcription of Adjacent Cellular Genes , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[47]  M. Goodman The role of immunochemical differences in the phyletic development of human behavior. , 1961, Human biology.

[48]  K. Usdin,et al.  The ability to form intrastrand tetraplexes is an evolutionarily conserved feature of the 3' end of L1 retrotransposons. , 1997, Molecular biology and evolution.

[49]  A. Buzdin,et al.  A new family of chimeric retrotranscripts formed by a full copy of U6 small nuclear RNA fused to the 3' terminus of l1. , 2002, Genomics.

[50]  N. Yang,et al.  An important role for RUNX3 in human L1 transcription and retrotransposition. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[51]  A. Furano,et al.  The biological properties and evolutionary dynamics of mammalian LINE-1 retrotransposons. , 2000, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[52]  S. Boissinot,et al.  Adaptive evolution in LINE-1 retrotransposons. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[53]  S. Boissinot,et al.  L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposon diversity differs dramatically between mammals and fish. , 2004, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[54]  C. Hutchison,et al.  An analysis of replacement and synonymous changes in the rodent L1 repeat family. , 1986, Molecular biology and evolution.

[55]  A. Furano,et al.  Determining and dating recent rodent speciation events by using L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposons. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  C. Hutchison,et al.  Dispersal process associated with the L1 family of interspersed repetitive DNA sequences. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[57]  Ziheng Yang,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood (PAML) , 2002 .

[58]  Anton Buzdin,et al.  The human genome contains many types of chimeric retrogenes generated through in vivo RNA recombination. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[59]  C. Hutchison,et al.  Tempo and mode of concerted evolution in the L1 repeat family of mice. , 1985, Molecular biology and evolution.

[60]  A. F. Scott,et al.  Origin of the human L1 elements: Proposed progenitor genes deduced from a consensus DNA sequence☆ , 1987, Genomics.

[61]  S. Boissinot,et al.  The structures of mouse and human L1 elements reflect their insertion mechanism , 2005, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[62]  Z. Yang,et al.  Likelihood ratio tests for detecting positive selection and application to primate lysozyme evolution. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[63]  S. Martin,et al.  Deletion analysis defines distinct functional domains for protein-protein and nucleic acid interactions in the ORF1 protein of mouse LINE-1. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[64]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[65]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  Slow molecular clocks in Old World monkeys, apes, and humans. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[66]  Susan Y Chi,et al.  Large differences between LINE-1 amplification rates in the human and chimpanzee lineages. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[67]  S. Boissinot,et al.  L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposon evolution and amplification in recent human history. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[68]  S T Sherry,et al.  Reading between the LINEs: human genomic variation induced by LINE-1 retrotransposition. , 2000, Genome research.

[69]  A. Furano,et al.  The evolution of long interspersed repeated DNA (L1, LINE 1) as revealed by the analysis of an ancient rodent L1 DNA family , 2006, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[70]  T. A. Hall,et al.  BIOEDIT: A USER-FRIENDLY BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT EDITOR AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR WINDOWS 95/98/ NT , 1999 .

[71]  J. V. Moran,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of recently integrated human Ta L1 elements. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.