ESTIMATING MODERATING EFFECTS IN PLS-SEM AND PLSc-SEM: INTERACTION TERM GENERATION*DATA TREATMENT

When estimating moderating effects in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLSSEM), researchers can choose from a variety of approaches to model the influence of a moderator on a relationship between two constructs by generating different interaction terms. While prior research has evaluated the efficacy of these approaches in the context of PLS-SEM, the impact of different data treatment options on their performance in the context of standard PLS-SEM and consistent PLS-SEM (PLSc-SEM) is as yet unexplored. Our simulation study addresses these limitations and explores if the choice of approach and data treatment option has a pronounced impact on the methods’ parameter recovery. An empirical application substantiates these findings. Based on our results, we offer recommendations for researchers wishing to estimate moderating effects by means of PLS-SEM and PLSc-SEM.

[1]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  Herman Wold,et al.  Soft modelling: The Basic Design and Some Extensions , 1982 .

[3]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  C. Lance Residual Centering, Exploratory and Confirmatory Moderator Analysis, and Decomposition of Effects in Path Models Containing Interactions , 1988 .

[5]  Jan-Bernd Lohmöller,et al.  Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares , 1989 .

[6]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[7]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  James C. Beaty,et al.  Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: a 30-year review. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Testing Moderating Effects in PLS Path Models. An Illustration of Available Procedures , 2005 .

[10]  Werner Reinartz,et al.  Empirical generalizations from brand extension research: How sure are we? , 2006 .

[11]  James A. Bovaird,et al.  On the Merits of Orthogonalizing Powered and Product Terms: Implications for Modeling Interactions Among Latent Variables , 2006 .

[12]  J. D. Hess,et al.  Mean-Centering Does Not Alleviate Collinearity Problems in Moderated Multiple Regression Models , 2007 .

[13]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[14]  Heungsun Hwang,et al.  Regularized Generalized Structured Component Analysis , 2009 .

[15]  H. Marsh,et al.  Structural Equation Models of Latent Interactions: Clarification of Orthogonalizing and Double-Mean-Centering Strategies , 2010 .

[16]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Comparison of Approaches for the Analysis of Interaction Effects Between Latent Variables Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2010 .

[17]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .

[18]  William Lewis,et al.  Does PLS Have Advantages for Small Sample Size or Non-Normal Data? , 2012, MIS Q..

[19]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Analysing quadratic effects of formative constructs by means of variance-based structural equation modelling , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[20]  A. Hayes Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[21]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[22]  Arun Rai,et al.  Predictive Validity and Formative Measurement in Structural Equation Modeling: Embracing Practical Relevance , 2013, ICIS.

[23]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Common Beliefs and Reality About Partial Least Squares: Comments on Rönkkö & Evermann (2013) , 2014 .

[24]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[25]  T. Dijkstra PLS' Janus Face – Response to Professor Rigdon's ‘Rethinking Partial Least Squares Modeling: In Praise of Simple Methods’ , 2014 .

[26]  Peter M Bentler,et al.  On Components, Latent Variables, PLS and Simple Methods: Reactions to Rigdon's Rethinking of PLS. , 2014, Long range planning.

[27]  Y. Takane,et al.  Generalized Structured Component Analysis: A Component-Based Approach to Structural Equation Modeling , 2014 .

[28]  T. Dijkstra,et al.  Consistent Partial Least Squares for Nonlinear Structural Equation Models , 2013, Psychometrika.

[29]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Consistent Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2015, MIS Q..

[30]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations , 2014 .

[31]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares , 2016 .

[32]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[33]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies! ☆ , 2016 .

[34]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Part II – A case study , 2016 .

[35]  Galit Shmueli,et al.  The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models , 2016 .

[36]  Christian Nitzl,et al.  The use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in management accounting research: Directions for future theory development , 2016 .

[37]  Edward E. Rigdon,et al.  On Comparing Results from CB-SEM and PLS-SEM: Five Perspectives and Five Recommendations , 2017 .

[38]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling , 2017 .

[39]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Market Research: The Process, Data, and Methods Using Stata , 2017 .

[40]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods , 2017, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[41]  Faizan Ali,et al.  An Assessment of the Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in Hospitality Research , 2017 .

[42]  JaeHong Park,et al.  Consistent Partial Least Squares Path Modeling via Regularization , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[43]  W. Reinartz,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of the Efficacy of Covariance-Based and Variance-Based SEM , 2009 .

[44]  S. Gudergan,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research , 2020 .