Capillary barrier performance in heterogeneous porous media

The effects of heterogeneities on the performance of capillary barriers is investigated by numerically simulating three systems comprised of a fine soil layer overlying a coarse gravel layer with (1) homogeneous, (2) layered heterogeneous, and (3) random heterogeneous property fields. The amount of lateral diversion above the coarse layer under steady state infiltration conditions is compared among the simulations. Results indicate that the performance of capillary barriers can be significantly influenced by the spatial variability of hydraulic properties. In the layered heterogeneous systems, realizations with highly stratified regions within the fine layer performed best and resulted in localized capillary barriers that delayed breakthrough into the coarse layer. In contrast, realizations of the random heterogeneous system performed worst because of channeled flow that produced numerous localized regions of breakthrough into the coarse layer. Results of the homogeneous model were comparable to the mean results of the layered heterogeneous realizations, but homogeneous results underpredicted the frequency and amount of breakthrough for all realizations of the random heterogeneous system. These results indicate that homogeneous models can be used to estimate the average behavior of layered heterogeneous systems with reasonable accuracy. In addition, engineered capillary barriers may be improved through emplacement and packing methods that induce highly stratified features within the fine layer of a capillary barrier system.

[1]  Clifford K. Ho,et al.  An experimental investigation of air venting of volatile liquid hydrocarbon mixtures from homogeneous and heterogeneous porous media , 1992 .

[2]  Benjamin Ross,et al.  The diversion capacity of capillary barriers , 1990 .

[3]  J. Selker.  Design of interface shape for protective capillary barriers , 1997 .

[4]  D. Zasłavsky,et al.  Surface Hydrology: III°Causes of Lateral Flow , 1981 .

[5]  S. Webb.  Generalization of Ross' tilted capillary barrier diversion formula for different two‐phase characteristic curves , 1997 .

[6]  R. Srivastava,et al.  Numerical Simulation of the Wicking Effect in Liner Systems , 1994 .

[7]  John C. Stormont,et al.  Capillary Barriers and Subtitle D Covers: Estimating Equivalency , 1997 .

[8]  S. W. Webb,et al.  Selection of a numerical unsaturated flow code for tilted capillary barrier performance evaluation , 1996 .

[9]  Lehua Pan,et al.  Downward water flow through sloping layers in the vadose zone: analytical solutions for diversions , 1997 .

[10]  K. Pruess,et al.  TOUGH2-A General-Purpose Numerical Simulator for Multiphase Fluid and Heat Flow , 1991 .

[11]  A. Gutjahr,et al.  Stochastic Analysis of Unsaturated Flow in Heterogeneous Soils: 2. Statistically Anisotropic Media With Variable α , 1985 .

[12]  Curtis M. Oldenburg,et al.  On numerical modeling of capillary barriers , 1993 .

[13]  D. Zasłavsky,et al.  Surface Hydrology: IV°Flow in Sloping, Layered Soil , 1981 .

[14]  Allan L. Gutjahr,et al.  Stochastic Analysis of Unsaturated Flow in Heterogeneous Soils: 1. Statistically Isotropic Media , 1985 .

[15]  John C. Stormont,et al.  The Performance of Two Capillary Barriers During Constant Infiltration , 1995 .

[16]  Allan L. Gutjahr,et al.  Stochastic Analysis of Unsaturated Flow in Heterogeneous Soils: 3. Observations and Applications , 1985 .

[17]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[18]  K. Pruess,et al.  TOUGH User's Guide , 1987 .

[19]  S. F. Dwyer,et al.  Prediction of tilted capillary barrier performance , 1997 .

[20]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1998 .

[21]  On conditions and parameters important to model sensitivity for unsaturated flow through layered, fractured tuff; Results of analyses for HYDROCOIN [Hydrologic Code Intercomparison Project] Level 3 Case 2: Yucca Mountain Project , 1990 .