Safety management theory and the expeditionary organization: a critical theoretical reflection

Management of safety within organizations has become a key topic within safety science. Theorizing on this subject covers a diverse pallet of concepts such as “resilience” and “safety management systems”. Recent studies indicate that safety management theory has deficiencies. Our interpretation of these deficiencies is that much confusion originates from the issue that crucial meta-theoretical assumptions are mostly implicit or applied inconsistently. In particular, we argue that these meta-theoretical assumptions are of a systems theoretical nature. Therefore, we provide a framework that will be able to explicate and reflect on systems theoretical assumptions. With this framework, we analyze the ability of two frequently used safety management theories to tackle the problem of managing safety of Dutch military expeditionary organizations. This paper will show that inconsistent and implicit application of systems theoretical assumptions in these safety management theories results in problems to tackle such a practical problem adequately. We conclude with a reflection on the pros and cons of our framework. Also, we suggest particular meta-theoretical aspects that seem to be essential for applying safety management theory to organizations.

[1]  K. Weick.  Reflections on Enacted Sensemaking in the Bhopal Disaster , 2010 .

[2]  David Woods,et al.  Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts , 2006 .

[3]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[4]  A. R. Hale.  Safety management in production , 2003 .

[5]  E. Trist.  The environment and system-response capability , 1980 .

[6]  Sidney Dekker.  Ten Questions About Human Error , 2004 .

[7]  Joseph Soeters,et al.  Task Force Uruzgan and experimentation with organization design , 2012 .

[8]  John A. Stoop,et al.  Modern accident investigation - Four major challenges , 2012 .

[9]  F. Guldenmund.  The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research , 2000 .

[10]  N. Luhmann.  Essays On Self-Reference , 1990 .

[11]  E. Hollnagel.  FRAM: The Functional Resonance Analysis Method: Modelling Complex Socio-technical Systems , 2012 .

[12]  Marlys K. Christianson,et al.  Managing the unexpected , 2001 .

[13]  Eh Erik Hans Kramer.  Organizing doubt:self-organization and army units in crisis operations , 2004 .

[14]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Barriers And Accident Prevention , 2004 .

[15]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition , 2003 .

[16]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition : The Realization of the Living (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Scie , 1980 .

[17]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[18]  A. Culyer,et al.  The effectiveness of occupational health and safety management system interventions: A systematic review , 2007 .

[19]  Peter A. Clark,et al.  Organizations in Action: Competition between Contexts , 1999 .

[20]  Francis Heylighen,et al.  Cybernetics and Second-Order Cybernetics , 2001 .

[21]  K. Roberts.  Some Characteristics of One Type of High Reliability Organization , 1990 .

[22]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations , 1983 .

[23]  Ludwig von Bertalanffy,et al.  The History and State of General Systems Theory , 1972 .

[24]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem , 1997 .

[25]  M. Bourrier.  The Contribution of Organizational Design to Safety , 2005 .

[26]  Gudela Grote,et al.  Understanding and assessing safety culture through the lens of organizational management of uncertainty , 2007 .

[27]  Teemu Reiman,et al.  Human and organizational biases affecting the management of safety , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[28]  Nina Modig,et al.  A continuum of organizations formed to carry out projects: Temporary and stationary organization forms , 2007 .

[29]  K. Boulding.  General Systems Theory---The Skeleton of Science , 1956 .

[30]  Emery Roe,et al.  High Reliability Management: Operating on the Edge , 2008 .

[31]  Kevin Kelly,et al.  Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines, Social Systems, and the Economic World , 1992 .

[32]  Scott A. Snook,et al.  Friendly Fire: The Accidental Shootdown of U.S. Black Hawks over Northern Iraq , 2001 .

[33]  Andrew Hale,et al.  MODELLING OF SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS , 1997 .

[34]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Risk Management, Adaptation, and Design for Safety , 1994 .

[35]  J. Alexander,et al.  Images of Organization , 1988 .

[36]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[37]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  The functional resonance accident model , 2004 .

[38]  Pierre van Amelsvoort,et al.  Het nieuwe organiseren : alternatieven voor de bureaucratie , 2010 .

[39]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Middle range theories of social systems , 1974 .

[40]  Eric-Hans Kramer,et al.  Tailored task forces: Temporary organizations and modularity , 2008 .

[41]  Gudela Grote,et al.  Safety management in different high-risk domains - All the same? , 2012 .

[42]  R. Stacey.  Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity , 1999 .

[43]  L. U. D. Sitter,et al.  Synergetisch produceren : human resources mobilisation in de produktie: een inleiding in structuurbouw , 2000 .

[44]  B. Dankbaar,et al.  From Complex Organizations with Simple Jobs to Simple Organizations with Complex Jobs , 1997 .

[45]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , 1999 .

[46]  M. Bhasi,et al.  A study on the impact of management system certification on safety management , 2011 .