Researching the use of voice recognition writing software

Abstract Voice recognition technology (VRT) has become accurate and fast enough to be useful in a variety of writing scenarios. Yet the field of composition and rhetoric has paid scant attention to this new technology so far. Additionally, we know little about how this technology might affect writing processes or our perceptions of silent writing. This review article explores future use of VRT by examining past research into the technology of dictation and suggests future avenues for research, including the effects of planning and the technology’s use in various phases of writing processes.

[1]  J. Goody,et al.  The Consequences of Literacy , 1963, Comparative Studies in Society and History.

[2]  Carol Berkenkotter,et al.  Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication , 1994 .

[3]  Peter Elbow The Shifting Relationships Between Speech and Writing. , 1985 .

[4]  Deborah McCutchen,et al.  Children's discourse skill: Form and modality requirements of schooled writing , 1987 .

[5]  Donald L. Rubin,et al.  Speaking-Writing Curricula: New Designs on an Old Idea , 1992 .

[6]  J. D. Gould How experts dictate. , 1978 .

[7]  C. Michael Levy,et al.  The Science of Writing : Theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications , 1996 .

[8]  Earle A. Buckley How to write better business letters : a practical, step-by-step discussion of the principles involved and the procedure to be followed in the preparation and dictation of successful letters , 1950 .

[9]  Lyn Pemberton,et al.  Representing Writing: External Representations and the Writing Process , 1992 .

[10]  Roland Kuhn,et al.  Rapid speaker adaptation in eigenvoice space , 2000, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[11]  Robert H. Zoellner Talk-Write: A Behavioral Pedagogy for Composition. , 1969 .

[12]  Sheridan Blau Invisible Writing: Investigating Cognitive Processes in Composition. , 1983 .

[13]  Peter Elbow,et al.  Closing My Eyes as I Speak: An Argument for Ignoring Audience. , 1987 .

[14]  Reviving the Rodential Model for Composition: Robert Zoellner's Alternative to Flower and Hayes. , 1992 .

[15]  Marilyn M. Cooper,et al.  Talking About Protocols. , 1983 .

[16]  K. Wetzel Speech-Recognizing Computers , 1996, Journal of learning disabilities.

[17]  Norman B. Sigband,et al.  Book Reviews : Writing Communications in Business and Industry. Nelda R. Lawrence and Elizabeth Tebeaux, 3rd Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1982 , 1982 .

[18]  Susan De La Paz,et al.  Composing via Dictation and Speech Recognition Systems: Compensatory Technology for Students with Learning Disabilities , 1999 .

[19]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Variation across speech and writing: Methodology , 1988 .

[20]  Barbara Tomlinson Talking about the Composing Process , 1984 .

[21]  Naomi S. Baron Alphabet to Email: How Written English Evolved and Where It's Heading , 2000 .

[22]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The limits of speech recognition , 2000, CACM.

[23]  Jack Goody,et al.  Literacy in Traditional Societies. , 1970, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[24]  Steven Golen,et al.  Principles of business communication : theory, application, and technology , 1984 .

[25]  Geoff Cumming,et al.  Evaluating speech-based composition methods: Planning, dictation, and the listening word processor. , 1996 .

[26]  James Britton,et al.  The development of writing abilities , 1975 .

[27]  Theodora Bosanquet,et al.  “Henry James at Work” , 2017, The Constant Listener.

[28]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The psychology of written composition , 1987 .

[29]  W. Ong,et al.  Orality and literacy : the technologizing of the word , 1982 .

[30]  W. Wayt Gibbs,et al.  Hello, is this the Web? , 1998 .

[31]  Noel Williams,et al.  Computers and Writing: State of the Art , 1992 .