Expanding the reach of decision and communication aids in a breast care center: a quality improvement study.

OBJECTIVE One academically based breast cancer clinic implements decision and communication aids as part of routine clinical care. This quality improvement study aimed to expand reach of these supportive materials and services with budget-neutral program changes. METHODS We used program theory and continuous quality improvement to design changes to our program. We calculated reach as the number of new patient visits for which we administered decision and communication aids. We compared reach before and after the program changes. RESULTS Program changes included: reassigning program outreach tasks from over-committed to under-utilized personnel; deploying personnel in floating rather than fixed schedules; and creating a waitlist so service delivery was dynamically reallocated from overbooked to underbooked personnel. Before these changes, we reached 208 visitors with decision aids, and 142 visitors with communication aids. Changes were associated with expanded reach, culminating in program year 2008 with the delivery of 936 decision aids and 285 communication aids. CONCLUSIONS We observed over a fourfold increase in decision aid reach and a twofold increase in communication aid reach. We attribute increases to recent program changes. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS This study illustrates how program theory and quality improvement methods can contribute to expanded reach of decision and communication aids.

[1]  C. Cunningham,et al.  A question sheet to encourage written consultation questions , 2000, Quality in health care : QHC.

[2]  R. Glynne-Jones,et al.  Can I look at my list? An evaluation of a 'prompt sheet' within an oncology outpatient clinic. , 2006, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[3]  P Mills,et al.  The SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration , 2008, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[4]  M. Stewart,et al.  Effect on Health-Related Outcomes of Interventions to Alter the Interaction Between Patients and Practitioners: A Systematic Review of Trials , 2004, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[5]  Margaret Holmes-Rovner,et al.  Implementing shared decision‐making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities , 2000, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[6]  Nan Cochran,et al.  Strategies for distributing cancer screening decision aids in primary care. , 2010, Patient education and counseling.

[7]  B. Moulton,et al.  Rethinking Informed Consent: The Case for Shared Medical Decision-Making , 2006, American Journal of Law & Medicine.

[8]  A. Edwards,et al.  Interventions before consultations for helping patients address their information needs. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[9]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , 2010 .

[10]  Karen R. Sepucha,et al.  Implementing breast cancer decision aids in community sites: barriers and resources , 2008, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[11]  M. Patton,et al.  Evaluation: A Systematic Approach , 1980 .

[12]  S. Brophy,et al.  Interventions for latent autoimmune diabetes (LADA) in adults. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[13]  Karen R. Sepucha,et al.  Training community resource center and clinic personnel to prompt patients in listing questions for doctors: follow-up interviews about barriers and facilitators to the implementation of consultation planning. , 2008, Implementation science : IS.

[14]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Recordings or summaries of consultations for people with cancer. , 2000, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  R. Thomson,et al.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[16]  Daniel F Chen,et al.  Monitoring the implementation of Consultation Planning, Recording, and Summarizing in a breast care center. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[17]  Karen R. Sepucha,et al.  Consultation planning to help breast cancer patients prepare for medical consultations: effect on communication and satisfaction for patients and physicians. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  R. Glasgow,et al.  The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? , 2001, Patient education and counseling.

[19]  Karen R. Sepucha,et al.  Building bridges between physicians and patients: results of a pilot study examining new tools for collaborative decision making in breast cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  Angela Fagerlin,et al.  Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer. , 2005, Health services research.

[21]  L. Esserman,et al.  Evaluation of a visit preparation intervention implemented in two rural, underserved counties of Northern California. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[22]  D. Rayson,et al.  The decision-making experience among women diagnosed with stage I and II breast cancer , 2007, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[23]  H. Rugo,et al.  Implementing decision and communication aids to facilitate patient-centered care in breast cancer: a case study. , 2009, Patient education and counseling.

[24]  William B. Cash,et al.  Interviewing Principles and Practices , 1975 .