Reliability of Repeated Cognitive Assessment of Dementia Using a Brief Computerized Battery

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term stability and reliability of a brief computerized cognitive battery in established dementia types. Method: Patients were administered the computerized battery twice with administrations approximately 2 hours apart, with intervening conventional neuropsychological tests. Patients were classified clinically, via consensus conference, as healthy controls (n = 23), mild cognitive impairment (n = 20), Alzheimer’s disease (n = 52), dementia with Lewy Bodies ([DLB], n = 10), or frontotemporal dementia (n = 9). Results: Minimal practice effects were evident across Cog-State test administrations. Small magnitude improvements were seen across all groups on a working memory task, and healthy controls showed a mild practice effect on the accuracy of associative learning. Conclusions: In established dementia, administration of the CogState tasks appears sensitive to cognitive impairment in dementia. Repeat administration also provided acceptable stability and test-retest reliability with minimal practice effects at short test-retest intervals despite intervening cognitive challenges.

[1]  D. Salmon,et al.  Therapy for Specific Problems Therapy for Specific Problems : Youth Tobacco Cessation , 2009 .

[2]  H. Westervelt,et al.  Practitioner’s Guide to Evaluating Change with Neuropsychological Assessment Instruments , 2012, Critical Issues in Neuropsychology.

[3]  T. Muramatsu,et al.  [Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)]. , 2011, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[4]  M. Folstein,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINCDS—ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease , 2011, Neurology.

[5]  H. Ehrenreich,et al.  Practice effects in healthy adults: A longitudinal study on frequent repetitive cognitive testing , 2010, BMC Neuroscience.

[6]  H. Vankova.  Mini Mental State , 2010 .

[7]  Eveliina Arponen,et al.  Visual assessment of [11C]PIB PET in patients with cognitive impairment , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[8]  P. Maruff,et al.  Evaluation of the Usability of a Brief Computerized Cognitive Screening Test in Older People for Epidemiological Studies , 2009, Neuroepidemiology.

[9]  P. Maruff,et al.  Reliability of repeated cognitive testing in healthy Indigenous Australian adolescents , 2009 .

[10]  G. Jicha,et al.  Relative preservation of MMSE scores in autopsy-proven dementia with Lewy bodies , 2009, Neurology.

[11]  C. Rowe,et al.  The Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging: methodology and baseline characteristics of 1112 individuals recruited for a longitudinal study of Alzheimer's disease , 2009, International Psychogeriatrics.

[12]  P. Snyder,et al.  Stability of cognitive impairment in chronic schizophrenia over brief and intermediate re‐test intervals , 2009, Human psychopharmacology.

[13]  P. Snyder,et al.  Validity of the CogState brief battery: relationship to standardized tests and sensitivity to cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia, and AIDS dementia complex. , 2009, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[14]  R. Koeppe,et al.  Equilibrium analysis of [11C]PIB studies , 2008, NeuroImage.

[15]  B. Miller,et al.  11C-PIB PET imaging in Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration , 2007, Neurology.

[16]  J. Morris,et al.  The Uniform Data Set (UDS): Clinical and Cognitive Variables and Descriptive Data From Alzheimer Disease Centers , 2006, Alzheimer disease and associated disorders.

[17]  P. Maruff,et al.  Practice Effects Associated with the Repeated Assessment of Cognitive Function Using the CogState Battery at 10-minute, One Week and One Month Test-retest Intervals , 2006, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[18]  Linda S. Hynan,et al.  MMSE Scores Decline at a Greater Rate in Frontotemporal Degeneration than in AD , 2006, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders.

[19]  M. Onofrj,et al.  Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: Third report of the DLB Consortium , 2006, Neurology.

[20]  R. Petersen.  Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity , 2004, Journal of internal medicine.

[21]  Paul Maruff,et al.  The effects of practice on the cognitive test performance of neurologically normal individuals assessed at brief test-retest intervals. , 2003, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS.

[22]  P. Maruff,et al.  Mild cognitive impairment can be detected by multiple assessments in a single day , 2002, Neurology.

[23]  P. Maruff,et al.  Behavioral Characterization of Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2002, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[24]  R. Faber,et al.  Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. , 1999, Neurology.

[25]  M Clarke,et al.  Using an annual over‐75 health check to screen for depression: validation of the short geriatric depression scale (GDS15) within general practice , 1999, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[26]  P. Gahlinger,et al.  Regression analysis in biological research: sample size and statistical power. , 1988, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.

[27]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[28]  H. Engler,et al.  In vivo amyloid imaging with PET in frontotemporal dementia , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[29]  B. L. Miller,et al.  11 CPIB PET imaging in Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration , 2007 .

[30]  D. Tulsky,et al.  WAIS-III WMS-III Technical manual , 1977 .

[31]  N. Tallent.  Psychological testing. , 1960, The American journal of nursing.