Sliding motion modulates stiffness and friction coefficient at the surface of tissue engineered cartilage.

OBJECTIVE Functional cartilage tissue engineering aims to generate grafts with a functional surface, similar to that of authentic cartilage. Bioreactors that stimulate cell-scaffold constructs by simulating natural joint movements hold great potential to generate cartilage with adequate surface properties. In this study two methods based on atomic force microscopy (AFM) were applied to obtain information about the quality of engineered graft surfaces. For better understanding of the molecule-function relationships, AFM was complemented with immunohistochemistry. METHODS Bovine chondrocytes were seeded into polyurethane scaffolds and subjected to dynamic compression, applied by a ceramic ball, for 1h daily [loading group 1 (LG1)]. In loading group 2 (LG2), the ball additionally oscillated over the scaffold, generating sliding surface motion. After 3 weeks, the surfaces of the engineered constructs were analyzed by friction force and indentation-type AFM (IT-AFM). Results were complemented and compared to immunohistochemical analyses. RESULTS The loading type significantly influenced the mechanical and histological outcomes. Constructs of LG2 exhibited lowest friction coefficient and highest micro- and nanostiffness. Collagen type II and aggrecan staining were readily observed in all constructs and appeared to reach deeper areas in loaded (LG1, LG2) compared to unloaded scaffolds. Lubricin was specifically detected at the top surface of LG2. CONCLUSIONS This study proposes a quantitative AFM-based functional analysis at the micrometer- and nanometer scale to evaluate the quality of cartilage surfaces. Mechanical testing (load-bearing) combined with friction analysis (gliding) can provide important information. Notably, sliding-type biomechanical stimuli may favor (re-)generation and maintenance of functional articular surfaces and support the development of mechanically competent engineered cartilage.

[1]  J Fisher,et al.  The effect of glycosaminoglycan depletion on the friction and deformation of articular cartilage , 2008, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[2]  E B Hunziker,et al.  Quantitative structural organization of normal adult human articular cartilage. , 2002, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[3]  Loss of Cartilage Structure, Stiffness, and Frictional Properties in Mice Lacking PRG4 , 2010, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  U. Aebi,et al.  The measurement of biomechanical properties of porcine articular cartilage using atomic force microscopy. , 2009, Archives of histology and cytology.

[5]  Mauro Alini,et al.  Surface motion upregulates superficial zone protein and hyaluronan production in chondrocyte-seeded three-dimensional scaffolds. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[6]  J. Buckwalter,et al.  Articular Cartilage and Osteoarthritis , 1954 .

[7]  F. Reinholt,et al.  Association of the Aggrecan Keratan Sulfate-rich Region with Collagen in Bovine Articular Cartilage* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  David C Lin,et al.  Robust strategies for automated AFM force curve analysis--I. Non-adhesive indentation of soft, inhomogeneous materials. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  D. Eyre,et al.  Collagens and cartilage matrix homeostasis. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  G. Ateshian,et al.  Mechanical properties of bovine articular cartilage under microscale indentation loading from atomic force microscopy , 2009, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[11]  H Weinans,et al.  Contribution of collagen network features to functional properties of engineered cartilage. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[12]  M. Benjamin,et al.  Expression of extracellular matrix molecules typical of articular cartilage in the human scapholunate interosseous ligament , 2006, Journal of anatomy.

[13]  Ueli Aebi,et al.  Dynamic elastic modulus of porcine articular cartilage determined at two different levels of tissue organization by indentation-type atomic force microscopy. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[14]  Emma J Blain,et al.  Mechanical regulation of matrix metalloproteinases. , 2007, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[15]  J. Matyas,et al.  Structural and functional changes of the articular surface in a post-traumatic model of early osteoarthritis measured by atomic force microscopy. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  Robert L Sah,et al.  Boundary lubrication of articular cartilage: role of synovial fluid constituents. , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[17]  G. Ateshian,et al.  Low-Serum Media and Dynamic Deformational Loading in Tissue Engineering of Articular Cartilage , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  K. S. Breuer,et al.  The role of lubricin in the mechanical behavior of synovial fluid , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Keith Bonin,et al.  Easy and direct method for calibrating atomic force microscopy lateral force measurements. , 2007, The Review of scientific instruments.

[20]  M. Benjamin,et al.  An Immunohistochemical Study of the Rabbit Suprapatella, a Sesamoid Fibrocartilage in the Quadriceps Tendon Containing Aggrecan , 2002, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[21]  Jason P. Gleghorn,et al.  Binding and localization of recombinant lubricin to articular cartilage surfaces , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[22]  Christopher J Hunter,et al.  Dynamic compression of chondrocyte-seeded fibrin gels: effects on matrix accumulation and mechanical stiffness. , 2004, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[23]  G. Jay,et al.  Homology of lubricin and superficial zone protein (SZP): Products of megakaryocyte stimulating factor (MSF) gene expression by human synovial fibroblasts and articular chondrocytes localized to chromosome 1q25 , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[24]  Moonsoo Jin,et al.  Effects of dynamic compressive loading on chondrocyte biosynthesis in self-assembling peptide scaffolds. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  R. Schulz,et al.  Cartilage tissue engineering and bioreactor systems for the cultivation and stimulation of chondrocytes , 2007, European Biophysics Journal.

[26]  Y. Nakamura,et al.  Isolation, characterization and mapping of the mouse and human PRG4 (proteoglycan 4) genes , 2000, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[27]  J. Elisseeff,et al.  Real-time monitoring of force response measured in mechanically stimulated tissue-engineered cartilage. , 2009, Artificial organs.

[28]  Liming Bian,et al.  Dynamic mechanical loading enhances functional properties of tissue-engineered cartilage using mature canine chondrocytes. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[29]  John E. Sader,et al.  Normal and torsional spring constants of atomic force microscope cantilevers , 2004 .

[30]  Ueli Aebi,et al.  Early detection of aging cartilage and osteoarthritis in mice and patient samples using atomic force microscopy. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[31]  C P Neu,et al.  Atomic force microscope investigation of the boundary-lubricant layer in articular cartilage. , 2010, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[32]  T. Aigner,et al.  Immunolocalization of matrix proteins in different human cartilage subtypes. , 2006, Histology and histopathology.

[33]  M. Brittberg,et al.  Articular Cartilage Engineering with Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation , 2003 .

[34]  G. Pharr,et al.  An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments , 1992 .

[35]  A. U. Daniels,et al.  Micro- and nanomechanical analysis of articular cartilage by indentation-type atomic force microscopy: validation with a gel-microfiber composite. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[36]  D. Wendt,et al.  Anabolic and catabolic responses of human articular chondrocytes to varying oxygen percentages , 2010, Arthritis research & therapy.

[37]  F. Guilak,et al.  In situ friction measurement on murine cartilage by atomic force microscopy. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  Mauro Alini,et al.  Tribology approach to the engineering and study of articular cartilage. , 2004, Tissue engineering.

[39]  S. Gogolewski,et al.  Biodegradable porous polyurethane scaffolds for tissue repair and regeneration. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[40]  M. Alini,et al.  Cells and biomaterials in cartilage tissue engineering. , 2009, Regenerative medicine.

[41]  M. Brittberg,et al.  Articular cartilage engineering with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. A review of recent developments. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[42]  Jacob N. Israelachvili,et al.  Adaptive mechanically controlled lubrication mechanism found in articular joints , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  K. Kuettner,et al.  Articular cartilage superficial zone protein (SZP) is homologous to megakaryocyte stimulating factor precursor and Is a multifunctional proteoglycan with potential growth-promoting, cytoprotective, and lubricating properties in cartilage metabolism. , 1999, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[44]  Elders Mj The increasing impact of arthritis on public health. , 2000 .

[45]  A. Bhosale,et al.  Articular cartilage: structure, injuries and review of management. , 2008, British medical bulletin.

[46]  Gerard A. Ateshian,et al.  A Paradigm for Functional Tissue Engineering of Articular Cartilage via Applied Physiologic Deformational Loading , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[47]  Mauro Alini,et al.  Fibrin-polyurethane composites for articular cartilage tissue engineering: a preliminary analysis. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[48]  M. Benjamin,et al.  An immunohistochemical study of the triangular fibrocartilage complex of the wrist: regional variations in cartilage phenotype , 2007, Journal of anatomy.

[49]  Mauro Alini,et al.  The use of biodegradable polyurethane scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering: potential and limitations. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[50]  Peter Fratzl,et al.  Collagen : structure and mechanics , 2008 .

[51]  M. Wimmer,et al.  Effects of simple and complex motion patterns on gene expression of chondrocytes seeded in 3D scaffolds. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[52]  M. Wimmer,et al.  Chondrocyte gene expression under applied surface motion. , 2006, Biorheology.

[53]  G. Ateshian,et al.  Frictional response of bovine articular cartilage under creep loading following proteoglycan digestion with chondroitinase ABC. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[54]  E B Hunziker,et al.  Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. , 2002, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[55]  Sally Roberts,et al.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair: monitoring its success by magnetic resonance imaging and histology , 2002, Arthritis research & therapy.

[56]  U. Aebi,et al.  The nanomechanical properties of rat fibroblasts are modulated by interfering with the vimentin intermediate filament system. , 2011, Journal of structural biology.

[57]  Khaled Elsaid,et al.  Association between friction and wear in diarthrodial joints lacking lubricin , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.