Convenient method of relative calibration of the neutron source emission rate between different source types

Neutron source emission rates are determined by absolute or relative measurement. The relative measurement is performed by comparing between a sample source and a calibrated reference source of the same type. In this calibration, the energy spectra of the sample and reference sources should be identical, since normally there exists energy dependence in the response of neutron detectors. We propose a method of relative calibration of the neutron source emission rate between different source types and spectra. In the present method, a sample source or a calibrated reference source is located at the center of a graphite pile and thermal neutron flux at a special position is monitored and compared. We performed gold foil activation measurements at the NMIJ/AIST graphite pile and revealed that the thermal neutron flux at that position per unit source emission rate is independent on the types of neutron sources. The details of the physical mechanism were examined by calculating the spectral fluence of the neutrons thermalized inside the graphite pile using the MCNP4C code. We demonstrated this method using Am-Be, Ra(alpha)-Be, Cf, Pu-Be neutron sources and obtained the successful results which agreed within 1%

[1]  N. Roberts,et al.  Investigation of the implications of 250Cf and 248Cm in 252Cf neutron sources. , 2004 .

[2]  H. Ohgaki,et al.  Absolute measurement of 192Ir , 1998 .

[3]  David J. Thomas,et al.  High resolution measurements of neutron energy spectra from AmBe and AmB neutron sources , 1995 .

[4]  A. Fukuda,et al.  Measurement of /spl gamma/-ray dose in a thermal neutron field by using a /sup 3/He-filtered GM counter , 1995, 1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record.

[5]  J. D. Court,et al.  ENDF/B-VI data for MCNP{trademark} , 1994 .

[6]  David R. Smith,et al.  Particle counting in radioactivity measurements. , 1994 .

[7]  W. Nelson,et al.  The Egs4 Code System , 1985 .

[8]  Y. Kawada,et al.  Experimental determination of a correction in the 4πβ-γ coincidence measurements on activated gold foils☆ , 1968 .

[9]  T. Michikawa,et al.  An Improved Correction for Effect of Internal Conversion and Gamma Sensitivity of β-Detectors for 4πβ-γ Coincidence Measure-ments on Activated Gold Foil , 1967 .

[10]  T. Michikawa,et al.  ESCAPE PROBABILITY OF MONOENERGETIC ELECTRONS FROM A THIN FOIL. , 1967 .

[11]  E. Axton,et al.  Calibration of the NPL standard Ra-Be photoneutron sources by an improved manganese sulphate bath technique , 1965 .

[12]  H. Ohgaki,et al.  Photon spectrometry in thermal neutron standard field , 2002 .

[13]  J. F. Briesmeister MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code , 1993 .

[14]  E. Axton Intercomparison of Neutron-Source Emission Rates (1979-1984) , 1987 .

[15]  D. H. Houston,et al.  REFERENCE MANUAL FOR ENDF THERMAL NEUTRON SCATTERING DATA. , 1968 .

[16]  T. Michikawa,et al.  AN IMPROVED CORRECTION FOR EFFECT OF INTERNAL CONVERSION AND GAMMA SENSITIVITY OF $beta$-DETECTORS FOR 4$pi$$beta$--$gamma$ COINCIDENCE MEASUREMENTS ON ACTIVATED GOLD FOIL. , 1967 .

[17]  P. A. Egelstaff,et al.  Neutron Physics , 1960, Nature.

[18]  P. Campion The standardization of radioisotopes by the beta-gamma coincidence method using high efficiency detectors , 1959 .

[19]  and as an in , 2022 .