Induction Variable Substitution And Reduction Recognition In The Polaris Parallelizing Compiler
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Utpal Banerjee,et al. Dependence analysis for supercomputing , 1988, The Kluwer international series in engineering and computer science.
[2] Rudolf Eigenmann,et al. Symbolic range propagation , 1995, Proceedings of 9th International Parallel Processing Symposium.
[3] Constantine D. Polychronopoulos,et al. Symbolic Program Analysis and Optimization for Parallelizing Compilers , 1992, LCPC.
[4] William Pugh,et al. The Omega test: A fast and practical integer programming algorithm for dependence analysis , 1991, Proceedings of the 1991 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (Supercomputing '91).
[5] Anoop Gupta,et al. Making effective use of shared-memory multiprocessors: the process control approach , 1991 .
[6] Rudolf Eigenmann,et al. The range test: a dependence test for symbolic, non-linear expressions , 1994, Proceedings of Supercomputing '94.
[7] Constantine D. Polychronopoulos,et al. Symbolic Analysis: A Basis for Parallelization, Optimization, and Scheduling of Programs , 1993, LCPC.
[8] Peng Tu. E cient Building and Placing of Gating Functions , 1995 .
[9] David A. Padua,et al. Experience in the Automatic Parallelization of Four Perfect-Benchmark Programs , 1991, LCPC.
[10] Lawrence Rauchwerger,et al. Automatic Detection of Parallelism: A grand challenge for high performance computing , 1994, IEEE Parallel & Distributed Technology: Systems & Applications.
[11] Mark N. Wegman,et al. An efficient method of computing static single assignment form , 1989, POPL '89.
[12] Michael Wolfe,et al. Beyond induction variables: detecting and classifying sequences using a demand-driven SSA form , 1995, TOPL.