Playing ‘catch up’ with blended learning: performance impacts of augmenting classroom instruction with online learning

ABSTRACT This study examines the efficacy of blended learning – an approach that combines in-class and online methods in a way that leverages the strengths of both – using a field experiment spanning 16 weeks. An information-processing model of learning suggests that learners will weigh the cost of information accessibility against its value in ways that will impact their interactions with the available information sources, which will consequently affect learning outcomes. Results of our study suggest that such an assessment did indeed occur and that it impacted learning performance. Specifically, our results support the idea that providing high-value content in both settings – the classroom (rich, yet high cost) and online (efficient, yet low cost), enhances performance. The largest gains in performance were seen by those who used the blended learning system the most, with the lowest gains by those who did not use the system at all (i.e. the control group).

[1]  Pei-Di Shen,et al.  Developing long-term computing skills among low-achieving students via web-enabled problem-based learning and self-regulated learning , 2013 .

[2]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  An Investigation of the Appropriation of Technology-Mediated Training Methods Incorporating Enactive and Collaborative Learning , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Hassan M. Selim Ahmed,et al.  Hybrid E-Learning Acceptance Model: Learner Perceptions. , 2010 .

[4]  Kamarul Azmi Jasmi,et al.  Self-regulated learning strategies , 2012 .

[5]  Gregory B. Northcraft,et al.  Is The End in Sight? Student Regulation of In-Class and Extra-Credit Effort in Response to Performance Feedback , 2010 .

[6]  Guendalina Capece,et al.  User satisfaction affecting the acceptance of an e-learning platform as a mean for the development of the human capital , 2013, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[7]  J. B. Arbaugh,et al.  What Might Online Delivery Teach Us About Blended Management Education? Prior Perspectives and Future Directions , 2014 .

[8]  Angel Cobo,et al.  Evaluation of the interactivity of students in virtual learning environments using a multicriteria approach and data mining , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[9]  Jane E. Klobas,et al.  A task-technology fit view of learning management system impact , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[10]  Karen Swan,et al.  Building Learning Communities in Online Courses: the importance of interaction , 2002 .

[11]  Gary Cheng,et al.  Exploring students' learning styles in relation to their acceptance and attitudes towards using Second Life in education: A case study in Hong Kong , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Mary Sue Love,et al.  A Comparison of Learning Outcomes in Skills‐Based Courses: Online Versus Face‐To‐Face Formats , 2016 .

[13]  Chia-Wen Tsai,et al.  An effective online teaching method: the combination of collaborative learning with initiation and self-regulation learning with feedback , 2013, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[14]  Blake Ives,et al.  Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic It Skills Training Author(s): Piccoli Et Al./web-based Virtual Learning Environments Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effe , 2022 .

[15]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  Research Commentary - The Design, Use, and Consequences of Virtual Processes , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The Use of Information Technology to Enhance Management School Education: A Theoretical View , 1995, MIS Q..

[17]  Luigi Proserpio,et al.  Teaching the Virtual Generation. , 2007 .

[18]  Kamla Ali Al-Busaidi,et al.  An empirical investigation linking learners’ adoption of blended learning to their intention of full e-learning , 2013, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[19]  Laura Varela-Candamio,et al.  E-learning and face to face mixed methodology: Evaluating effectiveness of e-learning and perceived satisfaction for a microeconomic course using the Moodle platform , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Donatella Persico,et al.  Self-Regulated Learning , 2011 .

[21]  Deanna Geddes,et al.  How Am I Doing? Exploring On-Line Gradebook Monitoring as a Self-Regulated Learning Practice That Impacts Academic Achievement , 2009 .

[22]  Derrick E. D'Souza,et al.  Using the Community of Inquiry Framework to Introduce Wiki Environments in Blended-Learning Pedagogies: Evidence From a Business Capstone Course , 2012 .

[23]  Kristina N. Bauer,et al.  Self-Assessment of Knowledge: A Cognitive Learning or Affective Measure? , 2010 .

[24]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[25]  Hyeoncheol Kim,et al.  A development of learning widget on m-learning and e-learning environments , 2013, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[26]  Brett J. L. Landry,et al.  Measuring Student Perceptions of Blackboard Using the Technology Acceptance Model , 2006 .

[27]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Mediators of the effectiveness of online courses , 2003 .

[28]  J. B. Arbaugh,et al.  An Investigation of Epistemological and Social Dimensions of Teaching in Online Learning Environments , 2006 .

[29]  Hyunseung Choo,et al.  Exploring the user experience of three-dimensional virtual learning environments , 2013, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[30]  Kenneth G. Brown,et al.  Self-Assessment of Knowledge: A Cognitive Learning or Affective Measure? , 2010 .

[31]  Ned Kock,et al.  Media Naturalness and Online Learning: Findings Supporting Both the Significant- and No-Significant-Difference Perspectives , 2007 .

[32]  Marco Kalz,et al.  Time will tell: The role of mobile learning analytics in self-regulated learning , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Grandon Gill,et al.  Teaching with the Case Method Online: Pure versus Hybrid Approaches. , 2005 .

[34]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Self-regulated learning strategies and software training , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[35]  Eugene Sadler-Smith,et al.  Learning on Demand, at Your Own Pace, in Rapid Bite-Sized Chunks: The Future Shape of Management Development? , 2008 .

[36]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[37]  Thomas Menkhoff,et al.  Enhancing students' learning process through interactive digital media: New opportunities for collaborative learning , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  Bing Wu,et al.  Empirical study on continuance intentions towards E-Learning 2.0 systems , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[39]  J. Ben Arbaugh,et al.  Introduction: Blended Learning: Research and Practice , 2008 .

[40]  A. Hwang,et al.  Virtual and Traditional Feedback‐Seeking Behaviors: Underlying Competitive Attitudes and Consequent Grade Performance , 2006 .

[41]  Calvin N. Moore,et al.  Mooers' Law or Why Some Retrieval Systems Are Used and Others Are Not , 2005 .

[42]  Robert M. Gagné,et al.  Essentials of Learning for Instruction , 1988 .

[43]  Robert A. Wisher,et al.  THE COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF WEB-BASED AND CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION: , 2006 .

[44]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Using Self-Regulatory Learning to Enhance E-Learning-Based Information Technology Training , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Research Commentary: Technology-Mediated Learning - A Call for Greater Depth and Breadth of Research , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[46]  J. Zenger,et al.  Why Blended Will Win. , 2001 .

[47]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  A Comparative Study of Distributed Learning Environments on Learning Outcomes , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  Robert M. Gagné,et al.  The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction , 1985 .

[49]  Luis L. Martins,et al.  A Model of Business School Students' Acceptance of a Web-Based Course , 2004 .

[50]  Pei-Di Shen,et al.  Developing an appropriate design of blended learning with web-enabled self-regulated learning to enhance students' learning and thoughts regarding online learning , 2011, Behav. Inf. Technol..