Uncertainty in estimates of internal doses to can arise for a variety of reasons, which include a lack of knowledge about assumed model parameters, uncertainty in exposure conditions, paucity of measurement data, and variability between individuals. In some cases, for example, causation or epidemiological studies, it is essential to be able to quantify this uncertainty for each individual in the study. It is often the case that some individuals within a cohort will have been subject to extensive measurements, enabling precise estimates of organ doses to be derived, while for others, the measurement data are sparse. The question is how can one make use of the measurement data on the former individuals to improve dose estimates for the latter? It will be seen that Bayesian inference provides the mechanism for doing this, since the essence of the Bayesian approach is to start with knowledge before the measurement data are known (prior knowledge), and then use the measurement data to revise it (posterior knowledge). This paper illustrates the Bayesian method by taking two such cases, who were both exposed by accidental inhalation of the same form of americium compound. Essentially, the comprehensive bioassay data available for the first worker is used to derive posterior probability distributions of absorption parameters for the americium material, which are used as prior information to improve the dose assessment for the second worker. Direct assessment of the uncertainty in the second worker’s dose, both with and without the additional information from the first worker, quantifies the improvement in dose assessment obtained.
[1]
M. Puncher,et al.
A Monte Carlo method for calculating Bayesian uncertainties in internal dosimetry.
,
2008,
Radiation protection dosimetry.
[2]
J. Marsh,et al.
Avoiding biased estimates of dose when nothing is known about the time of intake.
,
2007,
Radiation protection dosimetry.
[3]
A Birchall,et al.
Estimating uncertainty on internal dose assessments.
,
2007,
Radiation protection dosimetry.
[4]
M. Bailey,et al.
IMBA Professional Plus: a flexible approach to internal dosimetry.
,
2006,
Radiation protection dosimetry.
[5]
J. Marsh,et al.
Obtaining an unbiased estimate of intake in routine monitoring when the time of intake is unknown.
,
2006,
Radiation protection dosimetry.
[6]
R. Traub,et al.
SIX-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF AN ACUTE 241Am INHALATION INTAKE
,
2003,
Health physics.
[7]
J. Valentin.
Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values
,
2002,
Annals of the ICRP.
[8]
Icrp.
Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection
,
1994
.
[9]
Age-dependent doses to members of the public from intake of radionuclides: Part 2. Ingestion dose coefficients. A report of a Task Group of Committee 2 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
,
1993,
Annals of the ICRP.
[10]
H. F. Schulte,et al.
A study of the variations found in plutonium urinary data.
,
1969,
Health physics.