On the use of sampling statistics to advance bibliometrics

[1]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Universality of scholarly impact metrics , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[2]  Claudio Castellano,et al.  Analysis of bibliometric indicators for individual scholars in a large data set , 2013, Scientometrics.

[3]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Ambiguous author query detection using crowdsourced digital library annotations , 2013, Inf. Process. Manag..

[4]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Social Dynamics of Science , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[5]  F. Menczer,et al.  Scholarometer: A Social Framework for Analyzing Impact across Disciplines , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  Claudio Castellano,et al.  A Reverse Engineering Approach to the Suppression of Citation Biases Reveals Universal Properties of Citation Distributions , 2012, PloS one.

[7]  Claudio Castellano,et al.  Rescaling citations of publications in Physics , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  Filippo Radicchi,et al.  On the fairness of using relative indicators for comparing citation performance in different disciplines , 2009, Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis.

[9]  Claudio Castellano,et al.  Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Alexander I. Pudovkin,et al.  Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  On the meaningful and non-meaningful use of reference sets in bibliometrics , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[12]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Crowdsourcing Scholarly Data , 2010 .