Quantifying the Effect of Aerial Imagery Resolution in Automated Hydromorphological River Characterisation

Existing regulatory frameworks aiming to improve the quality of rivers place hydromorphology as a key factor in the assessment of hydrology, morphology and river continuity. The majority of available methods for hydromorphological characterisation rely on the identification of homogeneous areas (i.e., features) of flow, vegetation and substrate. For that purpose, aerial imagery is used to identify existing features through either visual observation or automated classification techniques. There is evidence to believe that the success in feature identification relies on the resolution of the imagery used. However, little effort has yet been made to quantify the uncertainty in feature identification associated with the resolution of the aerial imagery. This paper contributes to address this gap in knowledge by contrasting results in automated hydromorphological feature identification from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) aerial imagery captured at three resolutions (2.5 cm, 5 cm and 10 cm) along a 1.4 km river reach. The results show that resolution plays a key role in the accuracy and variety of features identified, with larger identification errors observed for riffles and side bars. This in turn has an impact on the ecological characterisation of the river reach. The research shows that UAV technology could be essential for unbiased hydromorphological assessment.

[1]  T. Petr.  Interactions between fish and aquatic macrophytes in inland waters. A review , 2000 .

[2]  G. Woodward,et al.  Integrating ecology with hydromorphology: a priority for river science and management , 2009 .

[3]  Paul S. Kemp,et al.  Habitat requirements of Atlantic salmon and brown trout in rivers and streams , 2003 .

[4]  R. Naiman,et al.  Spatial variation in environmental characteristics of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) rivers , 1998 .

[5]  David Gilvear,et al.  The use of remotely sensed data to detect channel hydromorphology; River Tummel, Scotland , 2004 .

[6]  A. Castelletti,et al.  Characterizing fluvial systems at basin scale by fuzzy signatures of hydromorphological drivers in data scarce environments , 2014 .

[7]  D. Crisp.  The environmental requirements of salmon and trout in fresh water , 2010 .

[8]  T. Berendonk,et al.  How to assess hydromorphology? A comparison of Ukrainian and German approaches , 2012, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[9]  P. J. Raven,et al.  River habitat quality : the physical character of rivers and streams in the UK and Isle of Man , 1998 .

[10]  Omri Allouche,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS) , 2006 .

[11]  Anne Lyche Solheim,et al.  A hitchhiker's guide to European lake ecological assessment and intercalibration , 2015 .

[12]  Monica Rivas Casado,et al.  Automated Identification of River Hydromorphological Features Using UAV High Resolution Aerial Imagery , 2015, Sensors.

[13]  S. Lane,et al.  Catchment‐scale mapping of surface grain size in gravel bed rivers using airborne digital imagery , 2004 .

[14]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data : principles and practices , 1998 .

[15]  H. Piégay,et al.  Hydromorphological frameworks: emerging trajectories , 2015, Aquatic Sciences.

[16]  J. Fleiss.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[17]  J. Boardman,et al.  High spatial resolution hyperspectral mapping of in-stream habitats, depths, and woody debris in mountain streams , 2003 .

[18]  Colin R. Thorne,et al.  AUTOMATIC DELINEATION OF FUNCTIONAL RIVER REACH BOUNDARIES FOR RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS , 2012 .

[19]  Florence Le Ber,et al.  Comparison of statistical algorithms for detecting homogeneous river reaches along a longitudinal continuum , 2012 .

[20]  Chunhua Zhang,et al.  The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: a review , 2012, Precision Agriculture.

[21]  M. A. Moreno,et al.  Applications of georeferenced high-resolution images obtained with unmanned aerial vehicles. Part I: Description of image acquisition and processing , 2014, Precision Agriculture.

[22]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Harshness in image classification accuracy assessment , 2008 .

[23]  Timothy A. Warner,et al.  Does spatial resolution matter? A multi-scale comparison of object-based and pixel-based methods for detecting change associated with gas well drilling operations , 2013 .

[24]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis , 1986 .

[25]  Hervé Piégay,et al.  Quantifying the temporal dynamics of wood in large rivers: field trials of wood surveying, dating, tracking, and monitoring techniques , 2009 .

[26]  R. Pontius,et al.  Death to Kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment , 2011 .

[27]  P. J. Boon,et al.  Towards a harmonized approach for hydromorphological assessment of rivers in Europe: a qualitative comparison of three survey methods , 2002 .

[28]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[29]  Won Suk Lee,et al.  Comparison of two aerial imaging platforms for identification of Huanglongbing-infected citrus trees , 2013 .

[30]  M. Rinaldi,et al.  A review of assessment methods for river hydromorphology , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[31]  R. Lawrence,et al.  Effects of sensor resolution on mapping in-stream habitats , 2002 .

[32]  Yaakov Anker,et al.  APPLICATION OF AERIAL DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY FOR MACROPHYTE COVER AND COMPOSITION SURVEY IN SMALL RURAL STREAMS , 2014 .

[33]  Emmanouil Psomiadis,et al.  Precision Agriculture - Comparison and Evaluation of Innovative Very High Resolution (UAV) and LandSat Data , 2015, HAICTA.

[34]  F. Visser,et al.  Quantifying submerged fluvial topography using hyperspatial resolution UAS imagery and structure from motion photogrammetry , 2015 .

[35]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[36]  P. Tarolli.  High-resolution topography for understanding Earth surface processes: Opportunities and challenges , 2014 .

[37]  Amy Woodget,et al.  The Accuracy and Reliability of Traditional Surface Flow Type Mapping: Is it Time for a New Method of Characterizing Physical River Habitat? , 2016 .

[38]  James Brasington,et al.  Accuracy assessment of aerial photographs acquired using lighter‐than‐air blimps: low‐cost tools for mapping river corridors , 2009 .

[39]  A. Large,et al.  ‘Natural’ rivers, ‘hydromorphological quality’ and river restoration: a challenging new agenda for applied fluvial geomorphology , 2006 .

[40]  F. López-Granados,et al.  Configuration and Specifications of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) for Early Site Specific Weed Management , 2013, PloS one.

[41]  Cheryl Ann Blain,et al.  AN AUTOMATED APPROACH TO EXTRACTING RIVER BANK LOCATIONS FROM AERIAL IMAGERY USING IMAGE TEXTURE , 2014 .

[42]  H. Piégay,et al.  “FluvialCorridor”: A new ArcGIS toolbox package for multiscale riverscape exploration , 2015 .

[43]  Andrea Buffagni,et al.  Does the lentic-lotic character of rivers affect invertebrate metrics used in the assessment of ecological quality? , 2009 .

[44]  Sebastian Birk,et al.  Intercalibration of aquatic ecological assessment methods in the European Union: Lessons learned and way forward , 2014 .

[45]  S. Sankaran,et al.  Low-altitude, high-resolution aerial imaging systems for row and field crop phenotyping: A review , 2015 .

[46]  K. Moffett,et al.  Remote Sens , 2015 .

[47]  G. Mathias Kondolf,et al.  The sizes of salmonid spawning gravels , 1993 .

[48]  F. López-Granados,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of mosaics from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery for precision agriculture purposes in wheat , 2013, Precision Agriculture.

[49]  A. Gurnell.  Plants as river system engineers , 2014 .