A self-paced approach to hypermedia design for patient education

Traditional theories on multimedia design have considered the importance of modality effect to a large extent. The stress on modality effect has often de-emphasized the importance of what information architecture can do to control modality effect if information presentation is self-paced instead of system paced. We have considered a patient education module as our case study. I propose a conversational interactive patient education module as a solution which responds to individual reader needs during hypermedia interaction. In this article, I take an initial step towards this approach, testing patient education modules with and without narration to support text and static graphics. Our results suggest that levels of reader comprehension and accuracy for modules with and without narration have similar performance. Readers have shown a preference towards using narration, online text and graphics based on individual task, if the system permits a self-paced interaction. Thus, we argue that modality effect may be influenced with a self-paced system.

[1]  I. Wakeman,et al.  Beyond the interface: users' perceptions of interaction and audience on websites , 2001, Interact. Comput..

[2]  J. Engvall Use of Computer-Assisted Instruction in Diabetes Education , 1994, The Diabetes educator.

[3]  J. Sweller COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[4]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1997 .

[5]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[6]  R. Mayer,et al.  Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening , 2002 .

[7]  Jan Plass,et al.  Health Education and Multimedia Learning: Educational Psychology and Health Behavior Theory (Part 1) , 2003, Health promotion practice.

[8]  Debopriyo Roy,et al.  Content management strategy and heuristic evaluation of a model electronic portfolio: a rhetorical approach , 2003, IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 2003. IPCC 2003. Proceedings..

[9]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? , 1997 .

[10]  C Jameson Patient education: the profession's greatest commission. , 1998, Dentistry today.

[11]  L. Suchman Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[12]  C Farr Multimedia: the gateway to better patient education. , 1996, Dentistry today.

[13]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[14]  Alekseĭ Nikolaevich Leontʹev Problems of the development of the mind , 1981 .

[15]  P. Chandler,et al.  Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn , 1994 .

[16]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity , 1999 .

[17]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[18]  R. Mayer,et al.  A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory , 1998 .