Information Sharing Preferences of Older Patients and Their Families.

IMPORTANCE Elderly patients often share control of their personal health information and decision making with family and friends when needed. Patient portals can help with information sharing, but concerns about privacy and autonomy of elderly patients remain. Health systems that implement patient portals would benefit from guidance about how best to implement access to portals for caregivers of elderly patients. OBJECTIVE To identify how patients older than 75 years (hereinafter, elders) and family caregivers of such patients approach sharing of health information, with the hope of applying the results to collaborative patient portals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A qualitative study was conducted from October 20, 2013, to February 16, 2014, inviting participants older than 75 years (n = 30) and participants who assist a family member older than 75 years (n = 23) to 1 of 10 discussion groups. Participants were drawn from the Information Sharing Across Generations (InfoSAGE) Living Laboratory, an ongoing study of information needs of elders and families based within an academically affiliated network of senior housing in metropolitan Boston, Massachusetts. Groups were separated into elders and caregivers to allow for more detailed discussion. A professional moderator led groups using a discussion guide. Group discussions were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed inductively using immersion/crystallization methods for central themes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Central themes regarding sharing of health information between elderly patients and family caregivers. RESULTS Seven lessons emerged from 2 main themes. First, sharing information has consequences: (1) elders and caregivers have different perspectives on what is seen as the "burden" of information, (2) access to medical information by families can have unintended consequences, and (3) elders do not want to feel "spied on" by family. Second, control of information sharing is dynamic: (4) elders wish to retain control of decision making as long as possible, (5) transfer of control occurs gradually depending on elders' health and functional status, (6) control of information sharing and decision making should be fluid to maximize elders' autonomy, and (7) no "one-size-fits-all" approach can satisfy individuals' different preferences. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Information sharing and control are complex issues even under the most well-meaning circumstances. While elders may delegate control and share information with family, they want to retain granular control of their information. When using patient portals, simple proxy access may not adequately address the needs and concerns of aging patients.

[1]  M. Gillick,et al.  The critical role of caregivers in achieving patient-centered care. , 2013, JAMA.

[2]  Susan G. Elliott,et al.  Information needs of informal caregivers of older adults with chronic health conditions. , 2011, Patient education and counseling.

[3]  Urmimala Sarkar,et al.  Care partners and online patient portals. , 2014, JAMA.

[4]  L. Lipsitz,et al.  Understanding health care as a complex system: the foundation for unintended consequences. , 2012, JAMA.

[5]  C. Safran,et al.  Internet based repository of medical records that retains patient confidentiality , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  S. Petronio Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure , 2002 .

[7]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Sharing is caring, but not error free: transparency of granular controls for sharing personal health information in social networks. , 2011, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[8]  S. Petronio Communication Privacy Management Theory: What Do We Know About Family Privacy Regulation? , 2010 .

[9]  Charles Safran,et al.  Acceptance and use of health information technology by community-dwelling elders , 2014, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[10]  David W. Bates,et al.  White Paper: Personal Health Records: Definitions, Benefits, and Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Adoption , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[11]  Kenneth D. Mandl,et al.  Indivo: a personally controlled health record for health information exchange and communication , 2007, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[12]  Kumanan Wilson,et al.  The challenges in making electronic health records accessible to patients , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[13]  B. Crabtree,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research , 1999 .

[14]  Erika L. Abramson,et al.  Consumer attitudes toward personal health records in a beacon community. , 2011, The American journal of managed care.

[15]  Charles Safran,et al.  Improving personal health records for patient-centered care , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[16]  Sandra Petronio,et al.  Family and Friends as Healthcare Advocates: Dilemmas of Confidentiality and Privacy , 2004 .

[17]  Sara Sanders,et al.  Chapter 12; Familial Caregivers of Older Adults , 2008, Journal of gerontological social work.

[18]  Tamilyn Bakas,et al.  Needs, Concerns, Strategies, and Advice of Stroke Caregivers the First 6 Months After Discharge , 2002, The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses.

[19]  M. Kuzuya,et al.  Information needs and sources of family caregivers of home elderly patients. , 2011, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[20]  Charles Safran,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Governance for Personal Health Records , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[21]  Patricia Flatley Brennan,et al.  A method to implement fine-grained access control for personal health records through standard relational database queries , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[22]  R. Adelman,et al.  Caregiver burden: a clinical review. , 2014, JAMA.

[23]  Kelly Caine,et al.  Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[24]  G. Bartlett,et al.  Revolutionizing patient control of health information. , 2013, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[25]  Gilad J. Kuperman,et al.  Policies for patient access to clinical data via PHRs: current state and recommendations , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[26]  J. Guralnik,et al.  Patterns of functional decline at the end of life. , 2003, JAMA.

[27]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Personal Health Information Management: Consumers' Perspectives , 2006, AMIA.