All That Glitters: A Review of Psychological Research on the Aesthetics of the Golden Section
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Matila C. Ghyka,et al. The geometry of art and life , 1946 .
[2] H. R. Schiffman,et al. Golden section: Preferred figural orientation , 1966 .
[3] R. Zajonc. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .
[4] Thompson Gg. The effect of chronological age on aesthetic preferences for rectangles of different proportions. , 1946 .
[5] Donald J. Watts,et al. A Roman apartment complex , 1986 .
[6] T. A. A. Broadbent,et al. The Divine Proportion. A Study in Mathematical Beauty , 1971, The Mathematical Gazette.
[7] Rosalie Asch,et al. The power of the center : a study of composition in the visual arts , 1983 .
[8] J. Piehl. The ‘Golden Section’: An Artifact of Stimulus Range and Demand Characteristics , 1976, Perceptual and motor skills.
[9] R. Sleight,et al. Aesthetic preference for isosceles triangles. , 1951 .
[10] Collins Lg,et al. THE GOLDEN SECTION REVISITED: A PERIMETRIC EXPLANATION. , 1965 .
[11] J. Adams-Webber,et al. The relation between lexical marking and rating extremity in interpersonal judgment. , 1973 .
[12] T M KUNNAPAS,et al. An analysis of the vertical-horizontal illusion. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.
[13] D. J. Bobko,et al. Preference in linear partitioning: The golden section reexamined , 1978 .
[14] C. O. Weber. The aesthetics of rectangles and theories of affection. , 1931 .
[15] J. Piehl. The Golden Section: The “True” Ratio? , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.
[16] J. Benjafield. A Review of Recent Research on the Golden Section , 1985 .
[17] M. Orne. On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. , 1962 .
[18] W. Wundt. Outlines of Psychology , 1897 .
[19] I C McManus,et al. The aesthetics of simple figures. , 1980, British journal of psychology.
[20] Lightner Witmer. Zur experimentellen Aesthetik einfacher räumlicher Formverhältnisse , 1893 .
[21] J. Benjafield. An Aesthetic Aspect of professional Sport , 1987 .
[22] A. H. Pierce. The Subconscious Again , 1908 .
[23] R. Ogden. Naive Geometry in the Psychology of Art , 1937 .
[24] T. H. Haines,et al. The psychology of aesthetic reaction to rectangular forms. , 1904 .
[25] E. Thorndike. Individual differences in judgments of the beauty of simple forms. , 1917 .
[26] F. Boselie. Complex and Simple Proportions and the Aesthetic Attractivity of Visual Patterns , 1984, Perception.
[27] Jay Kappraff,et al. Connections: The Geometric Bridge Between Art and Science , 1990 .
[28] Frans Boselie,et al. The aesthetic attractivity of the golden section , 1984 .
[29] John C. Jahnke,et al. Unity and the Golden Section: Rules for Aesthetic Choice? , 1991 .
[30] A. E. Crowley. The golden section , 1991 .
[31] C. Plug. The golden section hypothesis. , 1980, The American journal of psychology.
[32] R. Rosenthal,et al. The Volunteer Subject , 1965 .
[33] R. Schwartz,et al. States-of-mind model: cognitive balance in the treatment of agoraphobia. , 1987, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.
[34] L. T. Svensson. Note on the golden section , 1977 .
[35] Charles F. Hockett,et al. A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.
[36] L. Zusne. Visual perception of form , 1970 .
[37] D. Noton,et al. Eye movements and visual perception. , 1971, Scientific American.
[38] O. Külpe. Outlines of psychology, based upon the results of experimental investigation , 1895 .
[39] W. Wundt,et al. Outline of psychology. , 1897 .
[40] G. Stratton. Symmetry, linear illusions, and the movements of the eye. , 1906 .
[41] G. Kelly. The Psychology of Personal Constructs , 2020 .
[42] F. Mcguigan. The experimenter: A neglected stimulus object. , 1963 .
[43] Y. Nakajima,et al. Effect of Golden Ratio on the Beauty of Double Concentric Circles 1 , 1989 .
[44] M. Godkewitsch. The 'golden section': an artifact of stimulus range and measure of preference. , 1974, American Journal of Psychology.
[45] Vladimir A. Lefebvre. The golden section and an algebraic model of ethical cognition , 1985 .
[46] J. Benjafield. The 'golden rectangle': some new data. , 1976, The American journal of psychology.
[47] R. Rosenthal,et al. EXPERIMENTER OUTCOME-ORIENTATION AND THE RESULTS OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPERIMENT. , 1964, Psychological bulletin.
[48] G. Mitchison,et al. Phyllotaxis and the Fibonacci Series , 1977, Science.
[49] John H. Williams,et al. An Information Theoretic Approach to Understanding the Consideration Set/Awareness Set Proportion , 1991 .
[50] Jack Adams-Webber,et al. Self-other contrast and the development of personal constructs , 1985 .
[51] C. Judd,et al. Eye-movements and the Aesthetics of Visual Form. , 1903 .
[52] J. Guilford. The method of paired comparisons as a psychometric method. , 1928 .
[53] J. Benjafield,et al. The Golden Section and the accuracy with which proportions are drawn. , 1980 .
[54] Jean Piaget. Les méchanismes perceptifs. , 1961 .
[55] Frans Boselie,et al. The Golden Section has no Special Aesthetic Attractivity! , 1992 .
[56] Paul R. Farnsworth. Preferences for rectangles , 1932 .
[57] E J Mahon,et al. A note on the golden section. , 1984, The Psychoanalytic study of the child.
[58] Charles Bouleau,et al. The Painter's Secret Geometry: A Study of Composition in Art , 1963 .
[59] R. Arnheim. Art and Visual Perception, a Psychology of the Creative Eye , 1967 .
[60] Figural preference and the visual field , 1969 .
[61] T. M. Nelson,et al. Haptic aesthetic value of the golden section. , 1971, British journal of psychology.