All That Glitters: A Review of Psychological Research on the Aesthetics of the Golden Section

Since at least the time of the Ancient Greeks, scholars have argued about whether the golden section—a number approximately equal to 0.618—holds the key to the secret of beauty. Empirical investigations of the aesthetic properties of the golden section date back to the very origins of scientific psychology itself, the first studies being conducted by Fechner in the 1860s. In this paper historical and contemporary issues are reviewed with regard to the alleged aesthetic properties of the golden section. In the introductory section the most important mathematical occurrences of the golden section are described. As well, brief reference is made to research on natural occurrences of the golden section, and to ancient and medieval knowledge and application of the golden section, primarily in art and architecture. Two major sections then discuss and critically examine empirical studies of the putative aesthetic properties of the golden section dating from the mid-19th century up to the 1950s, and the empirical work of the last three decades, respectively. It is concluded that there seems to be, in fact, real psychological effects associated with the golden section, but that they are relatively sensitive to careless methodological practices.

[1]  Matila C. Ghyka,et al.  The geometry of art and life , 1946 .

[2]  H. R. Schiffman,et al.  Golden section: Preferred figural orientation , 1966 .

[3]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[4]  Thompson Gg The effect of chronological age on aesthetic preferences for rectangles of different proportions. , 1946 .

[5]  Donald J. Watts,et al.  A Roman apartment complex , 1986 .

[6]  T. A. A. Broadbent,et al.  The Divine Proportion. A Study in Mathematical Beauty , 1971, The Mathematical Gazette.

[7]  Rosalie Asch,et al.  The power of the center : a study of composition in the visual arts , 1983 .

[8]  J. Piehl The ‘Golden Section’: An Artifact of Stimulus Range and Demand Characteristics , 1976, Perceptual and motor skills.

[9]  R. Sleight,et al.  Aesthetic preference for isosceles triangles. , 1951 .

[10]  Collins Lg,et al.  THE GOLDEN SECTION REVISITED: A PERIMETRIC EXPLANATION. , 1965 .

[11]  J. Adams-Webber,et al.  The relation between lexical marking and rating extremity in interpersonal judgment. , 1973 .

[12]  T M KUNNAPAS,et al.  An analysis of the vertical-horizontal illusion. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  D. J. Bobko,et al.  Preference in linear partitioning: The golden section reexamined , 1978 .

[14]  C. O. Weber The aesthetics of rectangles and theories of affection. , 1931 .

[15]  J. Piehl The Golden Section: The “True” Ratio? , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[16]  J. Benjafield A Review of Recent Research on the Golden Section , 1985 .

[17]  M. Orne On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. , 1962 .

[18]  W. Wundt Outlines of Psychology , 1897 .

[19]  I C McManus,et al.  The aesthetics of simple figures. , 1980, British journal of psychology.

[20]  Lightner Witmer Zur experimentellen Aesthetik einfacher räumlicher Formverhältnisse , 1893 .

[21]  J. Benjafield An Aesthetic Aspect of professional Sport , 1987 .

[22]  A. H. Pierce The Subconscious Again , 1908 .

[23]  R. Ogden Naive Geometry in the Psychology of Art , 1937 .

[24]  T. H. Haines,et al.  The psychology of aesthetic reaction to rectangular forms. , 1904 .

[25]  E. Thorndike Individual differences in judgments of the beauty of simple forms. , 1917 .

[26]  F. Boselie Complex and Simple Proportions and the Aesthetic Attractivity of Visual Patterns , 1984, Perception.

[27]  Jay Kappraff,et al.  Connections: The Geometric Bridge Between Art and Science , 1990 .

[28]  Frans Boselie,et al.  The aesthetic attractivity of the golden section , 1984 .

[29]  John C. Jahnke,et al.  Unity and the Golden Section: Rules for Aesthetic Choice? , 1991 .

[30]  A. E. Crowley The golden section , 1991 .

[31]  C. Plug The golden section hypothesis. , 1980, The American journal of psychology.

[32]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  The Volunteer Subject , 1965 .

[33]  R. Schwartz,et al.  States-of-mind model: cognitive balance in the treatment of agoraphobia. , 1987, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[34]  L. T. Svensson Note on the golden section , 1977 .

[35]  Charles F. Hockett,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[36]  L. Zusne Visual perception of form , 1970 .

[37]  D. Noton,et al.  Eye movements and visual perception. , 1971, Scientific American.

[38]  O. Külpe Outlines of psychology, based upon the results of experimental investigation , 1895 .

[39]  W. Wundt,et al.  Outline of psychology. , 1897 .

[40]  G. Stratton Symmetry, linear illusions, and the movements of the eye. , 1906 .

[41]  G. Kelly The Psychology of Personal Constructs , 2020 .

[42]  F. Mcguigan The experimenter: A neglected stimulus object. , 1963 .

[43]  Y. Nakajima,et al.  Effect of Golden Ratio on the Beauty of Double Concentric Circles 1 , 1989 .

[44]  M. Godkewitsch The 'golden section': an artifact of stimulus range and measure of preference. , 1974, American Journal of Psychology.

[45]  Vladimir A. Lefebvre The golden section and an algebraic model of ethical cognition , 1985 .

[46]  J. Benjafield The 'golden rectangle': some new data. , 1976, The American journal of psychology.

[47]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  EXPERIMENTER OUTCOME-ORIENTATION AND THE RESULTS OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPERIMENT. , 1964, Psychological bulletin.

[48]  G. Mitchison,et al.  Phyllotaxis and the Fibonacci Series , 1977, Science.

[49]  John H. Williams,et al.  An Information Theoretic Approach to Understanding the Consideration Set/Awareness Set Proportion , 1991 .

[50]  Jack Adams-Webber,et al.  Self-other contrast and the development of personal constructs , 1985 .

[51]  C. Judd,et al.  Eye-movements and the Aesthetics of Visual Form. , 1903 .

[52]  J. Guilford The method of paired comparisons as a psychometric method. , 1928 .

[53]  J. Benjafield,et al.  The Golden Section and the accuracy with which proportions are drawn. , 1980 .

[54]  Jean Piaget Les méchanismes perceptifs. , 1961 .

[55]  Frans Boselie,et al.  The Golden Section has no Special Aesthetic Attractivity! , 1992 .

[56]  Paul R. Farnsworth Preferences for rectangles , 1932 .

[57]  E J Mahon,et al.  A note on the golden section. , 1984, The Psychoanalytic study of the child.

[58]  Charles Bouleau,et al.  The Painter's Secret Geometry: A Study of Composition in Art , 1963 .

[59]  R. Arnheim Art and Visual Perception, a Psychology of the Creative Eye , 1967 .

[60]  Figural preference and the visual field , 1969 .

[61]  T. M. Nelson,et al.  Haptic aesthetic value of the golden section. , 1971, British journal of psychology.