The Extended Adaptive Capacity Spectrum Method for the Seismic Assessment of Plan-Asymmetric Buildings

The use of nonlinear static procedures (NSPs) on the seismic assessment of real existing plan-irregular structures has so far been studied by a limited number of authors. This fact limits the application of such methods to assess current existing structures, the majority of which are irregular in plan. An extended version of the adaptive capacity spectrum method (ACSM) for the seismic assessment of plan-irregular buildings is presented in this paper. The novelty of this proposal is to comprise the most accurate features of commonly used NSPs in order to overcome the problems that subsist in three-dimensional pushover analyses. The accuracy of the procedure is tested in three plan-irregular real buildings. The results are compared with the capacity spectrum method (CSM) with the features proposed in FEMA 440, with the extended N2 method for plan-asymmetric structures, with the adaptive capacity spectrum method (ACSM) and with the most exact nonlinear dynamic analyses. Several seismic intensities are tested, in order to evaluate the performance of the procedure in different stages of structural inelasticity.

[1]  Rui Pinho,et al.  Detailed assessment of structural characteristics of Turkish RC building stock for loss assessment models , 2008 .

[2]  Rui Pinho,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND VERIFICATION OF A DISPLACEMENT-BASED ADAPTIVE PUSHOVER PROCEDURE , 2004 .

[3]  Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al.  Modeling of R/C Joints under Cyclic Excitations , 1983 .

[4]  Keri L. Ryan,et al.  Effects of torsion on the behavior of peripheral steel‐braced frame systems , 2011 .

[5]  Angelo D'Ambrisi,et al.  Use of Pushover Analysis for Predicting Seismic Response of Irregular Buildings: A Case Study , 2009 .

[6]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  The extended N2 method taking into account higher mode effects in elevation , 2011 .

[7]  JONATHAN HANCOCK,et al.  AN IMPROVED METHOD OF MATCHING RESPONSE SPECTRA OF RECORDED EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION USING WAVELETS , 2006 .

[8]  A. S. Elnashai,et al.  Confined concrete model under cyclic load , 1997 .

[9]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .

[10]  Liu Jie-ping,et al.  Elementary Introduction to Eurocode 8-design of structures for earthquake resistance , 2006 .

[11]  Rui Pinho,et al.  Assessment of Continuous Span Bridges through Nonlinear Static Procedures , 2009 .

[12]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric‐plan buildings , 2004 .

[13]  Rui Pinho,et al.  An adaptive capacity spectrum method for assessment of bridges subjected to earthquake action , 2007 .

[14]  H. Crowley,et al.  DETERMINATION OF EQUIVALENT SDOF CHARACTERISTICS OF 3 D DUAL RC STRUCTURES , 2008 .

[15]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  Displacement-based seismic design of structures , 2007 .

[16]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  VISCOUS DAMPING IN SEISMIC DESIGN AND ANALYSIS , 2005 .

[17]  Jean Donea,et al.  SPEAR (Seismic Performance Assessment and Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings) INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP , 2005 .

[18]  Iztok Peruš,et al.  TORSIONAL EFFECTS IN THE PUSHOVER-BASED SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF BUILDINGS , 2005 .

[19]  Yu-Yuan Lin,et al.  Study on Damping Reduction Factor for Buildings under Earthquake Ground Motions , 2003 .

[20]  M. Menegotto Method of Analysis for Cyclically Loaded R. C. Plane Frames Including Changes in Geometry and Non-Elastic Behavior of Elements under Combined Normal Force and Bending , 1973 .

[21]  Carlos Bhatt,et al.  Extension of the CSM‐FEMA440 to plan‐asymmetric real building structures , 2011 .