论文信息 - MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF AEROSPACE SYSTEMS

MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF AEROSPACE SYSTEMS

This paper presents the evaluation of different MDO methodologies which take into consideration optimization and other factors influencing their structures. Illustrative comparisons are made for analytic functions and a supersonic business jet design case study. Results show the promising features of the proposed evaluation metrics to define a standardized guideline when dealing with multidisciplinary optimization formulations which can be applied to aerospace systems design problems.

Kamran Behdinan | Ruben E. Perez | Hugh H. T. Liu

[1] Jeremy S. Agte,et al. Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis , 1998 .

[2] Srinivas Kodiyalam,et al. Initial Results of an MDO Method Evaluation Study , 1998 .

[3] Yuan Charles,et al. Evaluation of Methods for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO), Part II , 2000 .

[4] Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al. OPTIMIZATION OF COUPLED SYSTEMS: A CRITICAL OVERVIEW OF APPROACHES , 1994 .

[5] Jaroslaw Sobieszczanskisobieski,et al. On the sensitivity of complex, internally coupled systems , 1988 .

[6] S. Chen,et al. EVALUATION OF THREE DECOMPOSITION MDO ALGORITHMS , 2002 .

[7] John E. Renaud,et al. Response surface based, concurrent subspace optimization for multidisciplinary system design , 1996 .

[8] Christina Bloebaum,et al. A COMPARISON OF SOLUTION STRATEGIES FOR SIMULATION-BASED MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 1998 .

[9] Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al. Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: An Emerging New Engineering Discipline , 1995 .

[10] John E. Dennis,et al. Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization , 1994, SIAM J. Optim..

[11] Ilan Kroo,et al. Implementation and Performance Issues in Collaborative Optimization , 1996 .

[12] R. Haftka,et al. On options for interdisciplinary analysis and design optimization , 1992 .