Technology clusters: Using multidimensional scaling to evaluate and structure technology clusters

Empirical evidence suggests that the ownership of related products that form a technology cluster is significantly better than the attributes of an innovation at predicting adoption. The treatment of technology clusters, however, has been ad hoc and study specific: Researchers often make a priori assumptions about the relationships between technologies and measure ownership using lists of functionally related technology, without any systematic reasoning. Hence, the authors set out to examine empirically the composition of technology clusters and the differences, if any, in clusters of technologies formed by adopters and nonadopters. Using the Galileo system of multidimensional scaling and the associational diffusion framework, the dissimilarities between 30 technology concepts were scored by adopters and nonadopters. Results indicate clear differences in conceptualization of clusters: Adopters tend to relate technologies based on their functional similarity; here, innovations are perceived to be complementary, and hence, adoption of one technology spurs the adoption of related technologies. On the other hand, nonadopters tend to relate technologies using a stricter ascendancy of association where the adoption of an innovation makes subsequent innovations redundant. The results question the measurement approaches and present an alternative methodology.

[1]  Charles F. Hofacker,et al.  Measuring Consumer Innovativeness , 1991 .

[2]  R. LaRose,et al.  Organizational adoptions of the Internet and the clustering of innovations , 1995 .

[3]  Janet Fulk Social construction of communication technology , 1993 .

[4]  James S. Ettema,et al.  Three phases in the creation of information inequities: An empirical assessment of a prototype videotex system , 1984 .

[5]  G. Barnett Bilingual Semantic Organization , 1977 .

[6]  G. Barnett,et al.  A Symbols-And-Meaning Approach to the Organizational Cultures of Banks in the United States, Japan, and Taiwan , 1997 .

[7]  J. Woelfel,et al.  The cultural convergence of Korean immigrants in Hawaii: An empirical test of a mathematical theory , 1983, Quality & quantity.

[8]  Linguistic Relativity: The Role of the Bilingual , 1977 .

[9]  George A. Barnett,et al.  The diffusion of computer-assisted legal research systems , 1988, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[10]  David J. Atkin,et al.  Predicting Use of Technologies for Communication and Consumer Needs , 1996 .

[11]  David J. Atkin,et al.  Adoption of cable amidst a multimedia environment , 1992 .

[12]  G. Barnett,et al.  An examination of the relationship of United States television and Canadian identity , 1980 .

[13]  Louis Leung,et al.  Who are the Mobile Phone Have-Nots? , 1999, New Media Soc..

[14]  Edward L. Fink,et al.  The measurement of communication processes : Galileo theory and method , 1982 .

[15]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Technology: The New Media in Society , 1986 .

[16]  George A. Barnett,et al.  Communication and Cultural Development: A Multidimensional Analysis , 1981 .

[17]  Arun Vishwanath,et al.  An Examination of the Factors Contributing to Adoption Decisions among Late-Diffused Technology Products , 2003, New Media Soc..

[18]  A. Vishwanath Impact of personality on technology adoption: An empirical model , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  George A. Barnett,et al.  On the Nature of Synonyms: And This Little Piggie.... , 1979 .

[20]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[21]  Henry Pieszko Multidimensional Scaling in Riemann Space , 1970 .

[22]  J. Woelfel,et al.  THE GALILEO SYSTEM OF MEASUREMENT: PRELIMINARY EVIDENCE FOR PRECISION, STABILITY, AND EQUIVALENCE TO TRADITIONAL MEASURES , 1977 .

[23]  Myung-Hyun Kang,et al.  Digital Cable: Exploring Factors Associated With Early Adoption , 2002 .

[24]  Gina M. Garramone,et al.  Uses of political computer bulletin boards , 1986 .

[25]  R. LaRose,et al.  Audiotext and the Re-Invention of the Telephone as a Mass Medium , 1992 .