A statistical shape model of the human second cervical vertebra

PurposeStatistical shape and appearance models play an important role in reducing the segmentation processing time of a vertebra and in improving results for 3D model development. Here, we describe the different steps in generating a statistical shape model (SSM) of the second cervical vertebra (C2) and provide the shape model for general use by the scientific community. The main difficulties in its construction are the morphological complexity of the C2 and its variability in the population.MethodsThe input dataset is composed of manually segmented anonymized patient computerized tomography (CT) scans. The alignment of the different datasets is done with the procrustes alignment on surface models, and then, the registration is cast as a model-fitting problem using a Gaussian process. A principal component analysis (PCA)-based model is generated which includes the variability of the C2.ResultsThe SSM was generated using 92 CT scans. The resulting SSM was evaluated for specificity, compactness and generalization ability. The SSM of the C2 is freely available to the scientific community in Slicer (an open source software for image analysis and scientific visualization) with a module created to visualize the SSM using Statismo, a framework for statistical shape modeling.ConclusionThe SSM of the vertebra allows the shape variability of the C2 to be represented. Moreover, the SSM will enable semi-automatic segmentation and 3D model generation of the vertebra, which would greatly benefit surgery planning.

[1]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  Using Landmarks as a Deformation Prior for Hybrid Image Registration , 2011, DAGM-Symposium.

[2]  Neeraj Sharma,et al.  Automated medical image segmentation techniques , 2010, Journal of medical physics.

[3]  M. Neo,et al.  The Clinical Risk of Vertebral Artery Injury From Cervical Pedicle Screws Inserted in Degenerative Vertebrae , 2005, Spine.

[4]  Hua-Zi Xu,et al.  Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis , 2009, International Orthopaedics.

[5]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Group-Wise Registration of Point Sets for Statistical Shape Models , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.  Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: A review , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[7]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  3D Slicer , 2012, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[8]  H A Crockard,et al.  Radiological and anatomical evaluation of the atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation technique. , 1997, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  Aly A. Farag,et al.  3D Vertebral Body Segmentation Using Shape Based Graph Cuts , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[10]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[11]  S Kostrzewski,et al.  Robotic system for cervical spine surgery , 2012, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[12]  K. Takaoka,et al.  Cervical pedicle screw insertion: assessment of safety and accuracy with computer-assisted image guidance. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[13]  Bradford J. Wood,et al.  Segmentation of liver tumors using the Insight Segmentation and Registration Toolkit , 2004, CARS.

[14]  M. Neo,et al.  Efficacy of computer-assisted pedicle screw insertion for cervical instability in RA patients , 2007, Rheumatology International.

[15]  G. Yoshida,et al.  Clinical accuracy of three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement: a retrospective comparative study of conventional versus computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[16]  R. Gaines,et al.  Accuracy of Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Using the Funnel Technique , 2001, Spine.

[17]  R. Gaines,et al.  Morphologic Characteristics of Human Cervical Pedicles , 1997, Spine.

[18]  Calvin R. Maurer,et al.  Statistical shape model generation using nonrigid deformation of a template mesh , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[19]  Aly A. Farag,et al.  Segmentation of vertebrae using level sets with expectation maximization algorithm , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[20]  G. Saillant,et al.  Treatment of Lower Cervical Spinal Injuries—C3 to C7 , 1992, Spine.

[21]  Cristian Lorenz,et al.  Automated model-based vertebra detection, identification, and segmentation in CT images , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[22]  P. Danielsson.  Euclidean distance mapping , 1980 .

[23]  R. Opfer.  Tight frame expansions of multiscale reproducing kernels in Sobolev spaces , 2006 .

[24]  B. Michael Kelm,et al.  Fast and robust 3D vertebra segmentation using statistical shape models , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[25]  S. Umeyama,et al.  Least-Squares Estimation of Transformation Parameters Between Two Point Patterns , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[26]  René Schmidt,et al.  Cervical Pedicle Screws: Conventional Versus Computer-Assisted Placement of Cannulated Screws , 2005, Spine.

[27]  Constantin Schizas,et al.  Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy: A Meta-analysis , 2007, Spine.

[28]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Internal morphology of human cervical pedicles. , 2000, Spine.

[29]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  A Unified Approach to Shape Model Fitting and Non-rigid Registration , 2013, MLMI.

[30]  M. Richter,et al.  Computer-assisted posterior instrumentation of the cervical and cervico-thoracic spine , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[31]  T. Albert,et al.  Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparative accuracy of three techniques. , 2000, Spine.

[32]  Philippe C. Cattin,et al.  Statismo - A framework for PCA based statistical models , 2012, The Insight Journal.

[33]  Michael Kistler,et al.  The Virtual Skeleton Database: An Open Access Repository for Biomedical Research and Collaboration , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[34]  A. A. Zadpoor,et al.  Statistical shape and appearance models of bones. , 2014, Bone.

[35]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[36]  Y. Rampersaud,et al.  Clinical Accuracy of Fluoroscopic Computer-Assisted Pedicle Screw Fixation: A CT Analysis , 2005, Spine.

[37]  Martin Styner,et al.  Evaluation of 3D Correspondence Methods for Model Building , 2003, IPMI.

[38]  Roland Opfer,et al.  Multiscale kernels , 2006, Adv. Comput. Math..

[39]  Martin Styner,et al.  Framework for the Statistical Shape Analysis of Brain Structures using SPHARM-PDM. , 2006, The insight journal.

[40]  Guoyan Zheng,et al.  Scaled, patient-specific 3D vertebral model reconstruction based on 2D lateral fluoroscopy , 2011, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[41]  Andreas Weidner,et al.  Modification of C1–C2 Transarticular Screw Fixation By Image-Guided Surgery , 2000, Spine.

[42]  Michael J Lee,et al.  Vertebral Artery Injury During Cervical Spine Surgery , 2003 .

[43]  Milan Sonka,et al.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[44]  R. Verma,et al.  Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies including 5,992 pedicle screws , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[45]  M. Neo,et al.  Vertebral Artery Injury During Cervical Spine Surgery: A Survey of More than 5600 Operations , 2008, Spine.