Investigating Writing Development in Secondary School Learners of French.

Abstract Much of second language (L2) class time, particularly in school and university classes, is devoted to the teaching of writing, and written assignments form an important component of assessed work. We assume that learners’ L2 writing develops over time, in response to instruction, feedback, and practice. However, to date there has been very little research to show whether all skills involved in producing a well-structured and grammatically accurate text develop uniformly and respond equally to pedagogy. Our longitudinal study explored development in writing among a group of secondary school learners of French ( n  = 15), in their final year of high school. Data for the study were three in-class essays written by the students at regular intervals over a period of six months. The essays were analysed for global quality as well as for grammatical accuracy and syntactic complexity using several quantitative and qualitative measures. Results showed improvements at the discourse level and in linguistic complexity, but there were no significant improvements in accuracy and certain frequent errors persisted. Results also showed that students continued to rely on prefabricated chunks learned in class, but the ability to use such chunks creatively improved over time. The research and pedagogical implications of these findings are discussed.

[1]  Étude comparative des compétences grammaticales d'élèves du secondaire en FL1 et en FL2 au Manitoba , 2007 .

[2]  Jean-Marc Dewaele,et al.  Gender assignment and gender agreement in advanced French interlanguage: a cross-sectional study , 2001, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[3]  Shunji Inagaki,et al.  Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity , 1998 .

[4]  Ulla Connor,et al.  Analyzing Topical Structure in ESL Essays , 1990, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[5]  L. Rivard,et al.  Summary Writing: A Multi-Grade Study of French-Immersion and Francophone Secondary Students , 2001 .

[6]  Hans W. Dechert,et al.  Transfer in Language Production , 1989 .

[7]  M. Evans.  Recent research (2000–2006) into applied linguistics and language teaching with specific reference to L2 French , 2007, Language Teaching.

[8]  F. Myles,et al.  Rote or rule ? Exploring the role of formulaic language in classroom foreign language learning , 1998 .

[9]  James Grieve.  Dictionary of contemporary French connectors , 1996 .

[10]  Peter Skehan,et al.  The Influence of Task Structure and Processing Conditions on Narrative Retellings. , 1999 .

[11]  Juliette Blevins,et al.  Duality of patterning: Absolute universal or statistical tendency? , 2012, Language and Cognition.

[12]  Neomy Storch,et al.  The impact of studying in a second language (L2) medium university on the development of L2 writing , 2009 .

[13]  Robert M. DeKeyser,et al.  Practice in a Second Language: Introduction: Situating the concept of practice , 2007 .

[14]  Barbara Kroll.  Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom. , 1990 .

[15]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course , 1995 .

[16]  K. Hyland,et al.  Genre-Based Pedagogies: A Social Response to Process. , 2003 .

[17]  Roger Hawkins,et al.  French Grammar and Usage , 1997 .

[18]  Eric T. Liu,et al.  What Develops in the Development of Second-Language Writing?. , 1998 .

[19]  P. Skehan.  语言学习认知法 = A cognitive approach to language learning , 1998 .

[20]  Peter Robinson,et al.  Cognition and Second Language Instruction: COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION , 2001 .

[21]  Alison Wray,et al.  Formulaic Language and the Lexicon: List of Figures and Tables , 2002 .

[22]  Charlene Polio,et al.  Measures of Linguistic Accuracy in Second Language Writing Research , 1997 .

[23]  R. Lyster.  Predictability in French gender attribution: A corpus analysis , 2006 .

[24]  Neomy Storch,et al.  The impact of an EAP course on postgraduate writing , 2009 .

[25]  Ilona Leki,et al.  Second Language Writing: Coaching from the margins: issues in written response , 1990 .

[26]  Relating gender errors to morphosyntax and lexicon in advanced French interlanguage , 2000 .

[27]  Dana R. Ferris,et al.  Response To Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students , 2003 .

[28]  L. Ortega.  Syntactic Complexity Measures and Their Relationship to L2 Proficiency: A Research Synthesis of College-Level L2 Writing. , 2003 .

[29]  J. Vinay,et al.  Stylistique Comparée du Français et de l'Anglais: Méthode de Traduction , 1958 .

[30]  M. Howard.  The expression of number and person through verb morphology in advanced French interlanguage , 2006 .

[31]  Inge Bartning.  Gender agreement in L2 French: Pre-advanced vs advanced learners , 2000 .

[32]  Jean Chandler,et al.  THE EFFICACY OF VARIOUS KINDS OF ERROR FEEDBACK FOR IMPROVEMENT IN THE ACCURACY AND FLUENCY OF L2 STUDENT WRITING , 2003 .

[33]  Bernard Comrie,et al.  Grammatical Gender Systems: A Linguist's Assessment , 1999 .

[34]  James Milton,et al.  Language Lite? Learning French Vocabulary in School , 2006, Journal of French Language Studies.

[35]  John Bitchener,et al.  Evidence in Support of Written Corrective Feedback. , 2008 .

[36]  F. Myles,et al.  INTERROGATIVE CHUNKS IN FRENCH L2 , 1999, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[37]  P. Prévost.  L'influence du paradigme verbal de la langue maternelle sur la variabilité morphologique en acquisition du français L2 par des apprenants adultes , 2007 .

[38]  Peter Skehan,et al.  Cognition and Second Language Instruction: Cognition and tasks , 2001 .

[39]  M. Seaman,et al.  Writing in the Secondary Foreign Language Classroom: The Effects of Prompts and Tasks on Novice Learners of French , 2000 .

[40]  Martin Nystrand,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Writing Development , 2009 .