Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization

Abstract. By coordinating the design and distribution of global climate model simulations of the past, current, and future climate, the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) has become one of the foundational elements of climate science. However, the need to address an ever-expanding range of scientific questions arising from more and more research communities has made it necessary to revise the organization of CMIP. After a long and wide community consultation, a new and more federated structure has been put in place. It consists of three major elements: (1) a handful of common experiments, the DECK (Diagnostic, Evaluation and Characterization of Klima) and CMIP historical simulations (1850–near present) that will maintain continuity and help document basic characteristics of models across different phases of CMIP; (2) common standards, coordination, infrastructure, and documentation that will facilitate the distribution of model outputs and the characterization of the model ensemble; and (3) an ensemble of CMIP-Endorsed Model Intercomparison Projects (MIPs) that will be specific to a particular phase of CMIP (now CMIP6) and that will build on the DECK and CMIP historical simulations to address a large range of specific questions and fill the scientific gaps of the previous CMIP phases. The DECK and CMIP historical simulations, together with the use of CMIP data standards, will be the entry cards for models participating in CMIP. Participation in CMIP6-Endorsed MIPs by individual modelling groups will be at their own discretion and will depend on their scientific interests and priorities. With the Grand Science Challenges of the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) as its scientific backdrop, CMIP6 will address three broad questions: – How does the Earth system respond to forcing? – What are the origins and consequences of systematic model biases? – How can we assess future climate changes given internal climate variability, predictability, and uncertainties in scenarios? This CMIP6 overview paper presents the background and rationale for the new structure of CMIP, provides a detailed description of the DECK and CMIP6 historical simulations, and includes a brief introduction to the 21 CMIP6-Endorsed MIPs.

[1]  B. Stevens.  Rethinking the Lower Bound on Aerosol Radiative Forcing , 2015 .

[2]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment , 2010, Nature.

[3]  Charles Doutriaux,et al.  A More Powerful Reality Test for Climate Models , 2016 .

[4]  B. Stevens,et al.  Eurasian winter cooling in the warming hiatus of 1998–2012 , 2015 .

[5]  Florian Rauser,et al.  Rethinking the default construction of multi-model climate ensembles , 2015 .

[6]  S. M. Marlais,et al.  An Overview of the Results of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP I) , 1999 .

[7]  M. Webb,et al.  Tropospheric Adjustment Induces a Cloud Component in CO2 Forcing , 2008 .

[8]  J. Gregory.  Long‐term effect of volcanic forcing on ocean heat content , 2010 .

[9]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  A Summary of the CMIP5 Experiment Design , 2010 .

[10]  Masahiro Watanabe,et al.  Tropospheric adjustment to increasing CO2: its timescale and the role of land–sea contrast , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[11]  G. Meehl,et al.  OVERVIEW OF THE COUPLED MODEL INTERCOMPARISON PROJECT , 2005 .

[12]  E. Stehfest,et al.  Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500–2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands , 2011 .

[13]  R. Moss,et al.  Climate model intercomparisons: Preparing for the next phase , 2014 .

[14]  Duane E. Waliser,et al.  Satellite Observations for CMIP5: The Genesis of Obs4MIPs , 2014 .

[15]  Sébastien Denvil,et al.  Robust direct effect of carbon dioxide on tropical circulation and regional precipitation , 2013 .

[16]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Evolving Obs4MIPs to Support Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) , 2015 .

[17]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  Transient Response of the Hadley Centre Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model to Increasing Carbon Dioxide. Part II: Spatial and Temporal Structure of Response , 1995 .

[18]  C. Deser,et al.  Evaluating Modes of Variability in Climate Models , 2014 .

[19]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  Simulated and observed decadal variability in ocean heat content , 2004 .

[20]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  Clouds, circulation and climate sensitivity , 2015 .

[21]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[22]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity , 2004 .

[23]  K. Riahi,et al.  The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century , 2017 .

[24]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  THE WCRP CMIP 3 MULTIMODEL DATASET A New Era in Climate Change Research , 2017 .

[25]  M. Webb,et al.  A quantitative performance assessment of cloud regimes in climate models , 2009 .

[26]  S. Malyshev,et al.  Time Scales of Terrestrial Carbon Response Related to Land-Use Application: Implications for Initializing an Earth System Model , 2011 .

[27]  R. Houghton,et al.  How well do we know the flux of CO2 from land-use change? , 2010 .

[28]  Ronald J. Stouffer,et al.  A method for obtaining pre-twentieth century initial conditions for use in climate change studies , 2004 .

[29]  Crowley,et al.  Atmospheric science: Methane rises from wetlands , 2011, Nature.

[30]  Cecelia DeLuca,et al.  Describing Earth system simulations with the Metafor CIM , 2012 .

[31]  D. Shindell,et al.  Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing , 2014 .

[32]  G. Meehl,et al.  The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) , 2000 .

[33]  Stevens,et al.  CMIP5 Scientific Gaps and Recommendations for CMIP6 , 2017 .

[34]  Guy P. Brasseur,et al.  Future directions for the World Climate Research Programme , 2015 .

[35]  Simon Read,et al.  ESMValTool (v1.0) – a community diagnostic and performance metrics tool for routine evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP , 2015 .

[36]  A. Thomson,et al.  The representative concentration pathways: an overview , 2011 .

[37]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  CMIP5 Scientific Gaps and Recommendations for CMIP6 , 2017 .

[38]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Evaluation of Climate Models. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2013 .

[39]  J. Gregory,et al.  Climate models without preindustrial volcanic forcing underestimate historical ocean thermal expansion , 2013 .

[40]  G. Meehl,et al.  Intercomparison makes for a better climate model , 1997 .

[41]  C. Deser,et al.  Communication of the role of natural variability in future North American climate , 2012 .

[42]  Ghassem R. Asrar,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities in Water Cycle Research: WCRP Contributions , 2014, Surveys in Geophysics.

[43]  Myles R. Allen,et al.  Observational Constraints on Past Attributable Warming and Predictions of Future Global Warming , 2006 .

[44]  Dean N. Williams,et al.  A Global Repository for Planet-Sized Experiments and Observations , 2016 .

[45]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[46]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  THE WCRP CMIP3 Multimodel Dataset: A New Era in Climate Change Research , 2007 .

[47]  D. Saint‐Martin,et al.  Transient Climate Response in a Two-Layer Energy-Balance Model. Part I: Analytical Solution and Parameter Calibration Using CMIP5 AOGCM Experiments , 2013 .

[48]  Olivier Boucher,et al.  Adjustments in the Forcing-Feedback Framework for Understanding Climate Change , 2014 .

[49]  J. Murphy,et al.  Transient response of the Hadley Centre coupled ocean-atmosphere model to increasing carbon-dioxide , 1995 .