Coping with Spatial Heterogeneity Effects on Sampling and Analysis at an HMX-Contaminated Antitank Firing Range.

Short-range and mid-range (grid size) spatial heterogeneity in explosives concentrations within surface soils was studied at an active antitank firing range. Intensive sampling was conducted adjacent to two target tanks by establishing sixteen 6-m-square grids. Each grid was subdivided into four quadrants, and in each quadrant an area-integrated surface sample was formed into a pile that included about 10% of the top 5 cm of soil in the quadrant. After in situ homogenization, random aliquots were combined to form replicate representative samples. Grid composites were also prepared by combining equal portions of soil from the four quadrants for each grid. In nine of the quadrants, a second area-integrated sample was prepared. On-site analysis showed concentrations of HMX ranging from as high as 2160 mg/kg near one target to ≤1 mg/kg at a distance of 20 m from the target. TNT concentrations, ranging from ≤1 to 23 mg/kg, were much lower than would be expected based on the 70 : 30 composition ratio of HMX to TNT in the melt-cast explosive used on site. On-site concentration estimates for HMX and TNT were in excellent agreement with laboratory HPLC results; correlation coefficients were 0.992 and 0.975, respectively. Spatial heterogeneity of HMX concentrations was large on both short- and midrange scales, and this factor dominated the overall uncertainty associated with site characterization. Greater emphasis on sampling is urgently needed to improve the representativeness of explosives residue determinations in soil. ©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Field Analyt Chem Technol 3:19–28, 1999

[1]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  Assessment of Sampling Error Associated with Collection and Analysis of Soil Samples at Explosives-Contaminated Sites. , 1996 .

[2]  M. Walsh,et al.  Development of field screening methods for TNT, 2,4-DNT and RDX in soil. , 1992, Talanta.

[3]  D. Cameron,et al.  ACCURACY OF FIELD SAMPLING FOR SOIL TESTS , 1971 .

[4]  J. Paasiv́irta,et al.  Use of composited samples to optimize the monitoring of environmental toxins , 1989 .

[5]  T. F. Jenkins,et al.  Holding-time estimates for soils containing explosives residues: Comparison of fortification vs. field contamination , 1995 .

[6]  W. Horwitz,et al.  Evaluation of Analytical Methods Used for Regulation of Foods and Drugs , 1982 .

[7]  M. Fabrizio,et al.  Procedures for formation of composite samples from segmented populations. , 1995, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Marianne E. Walsh,et al.  Development of colorimetric field screening methods for munitions compounds in soil , 1995, Other Conferences.

[9]  H. Craig,et al.  Federal Facilities Forum Issue Field Sampling And Selecting On-site Analytical Methods For Explosives In Water , 1999 .

[10]  David J. Schaeffer,et al.  Grab versus composite sampling: A primer for the manager and engineer , 1980 .

[11]  Marianne E. Walsh,et al.  Evaluation of SW846 method 8330 for characterization of sites contaminated with residues of high explosives , 1993 .

[12]  D. Rosenblatt,et al.  Organic Explosives and Related Compounds. Environmental and Health Considerations , 1989 .

[13]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  Sampling error associated with collection and analysis of soil samples at TNT‐contaminated sites , 1997 .