Quantum-optimal detection of one-versus-two incoherent optical sources with arbitrary separation

We analyze the fundamental quantum limit of the resolution of an optical imaging system from the perspective of the detection problem of deciding whether the optical field in the image plane is generated by one incoherent on-axis source with brightness $$\epsilon$$ϵ or by two $$\epsilon {\mathrm{/}}2$$ϵ∕2-brightness incoherent sources that are symmetrically disposed about the optical axis. Using the exact thermal-state model of the field, we derive the quantum Chernoff bound for the detection problem, which specifies the optimum rate of decay of the error probability with increasing number of collected photons that is allowed by quantum mechanics. We then show that recently proposed linear-optic schemes approach the quantum Chernoff bound—the method of binary spatial-mode demultiplexing (B-SPADE) is quantum-optimal for all values of separation, while a method using image inversion interferometry (SLIVER) is near-optimal for sub-Rayleigh separations. We then simplify our model using a low-brightness approximation that is very accurate for optical microscopy and astronomy, derive quantum Chernoff bounds conditional on the number of photons detected, and show the optimality of our schemes in this conditional detection paradigm. For comparison, we analytically demonstrate the superior scaling of the Chernoff bound for our schemes with source separation relative to that of spatially resolved direct imaging. Our schemes have the advantages over the quantum-optimal (Helstrom) measurement in that they do not involve joint measurements over multiple modes, and that they do not require the angular separation for the two-source hypothesis to be given a priori and can offer that information as a bonus in the event of a successful detection.Quantum measurement: Seeing clearly with quantum estimation theoryTwo schemes to distinguish between emitters can nearly reach the best possible resolution more easily than the known optimal method. The accuracy with which two light sources can be identified is normally taken from the Rayleigh criterion, which is a classical calculation. By performing quantum measurements the classical limit can be beaten, but the protocol necessary to achieve the optimal result involves difficult-to-perform joint measurements and knowledge of the source separation. Xiao-Ming Lu from Hangzhou Dianzi University and the National University of Singapore, with colleagues from the USA, has shown that two previously-introduced measurement schemes called B-SPADE and SLIVER can achieve nearly the same accuracy while being much simpler to perform. Potential applications of the result include identifying binary stars and identifying separate emitters in medical fluorescence imaging.

[1]  Vladislav Kargin,et al.  On the Chernoff bound for efficiency of quantum hypothesis testing , 2003, math/0308077.

[2]  Mankei Tsang,et al.  Interferometric superlocalization of two incoherent optical point sources. , 2015, Optics express.

[3]  Z Hradil,et al.  Optimal measurements for resolution beyond the Rayleigh limit. , 2017, Optics letters.

[4]  Christoph Simon,et al.  Far-field linear optical superresolution via heterodyne detection in a higher-order local oscillator mode , 2016, 1606.02662.

[5]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[6]  Lord Rayleigh F.R.S. LVI. Investigations in optics, with special reference to the spectroscope , 1879 .

[7]  J. Goodman Introduction to Fourier optics , 1969 .

[8]  Jerry Chao,et al.  Fisher information theory for parameter estimation in single molecule microscopy: tutorial. , 2016, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[9]  H. Chernoff A Measure of Asymptotic Efficiency for Tests of a Hypothesis Based on the sum of Observations , 1952 .

[10]  K. Audenaert,et al.  Discriminating States: the quantum Chernoff bound. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[11]  M. Nussbaum,et al.  Asymptotic Error Rates in Quantum Hypothesis Testing , 2007, Communications in Mathematical Physics.

[12]  Steven Kay,et al.  Fundamentals Of Statistical Signal Processing , 2001 .

[13]  D. Vernon Inform , 1995, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

[14]  Mankei Tsang Subdiffraction incoherent optical imaging via spatial-mode demultiplexing , 2017 .

[15]  Masahito Hayashi,et al.  On error exponents in quantum hypothesis testing , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[17]  Carl W. Helstrom Resolution of point sources of light as analyzed by quantum detection theory , 1973, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[18]  林 正人 Quantum information : an introduction , 2006 .

[19]  Semiclassical Theory of Superresolution for Two Incoherent Optical Point Sources , 2016, 1602.04655.

[20]  Attaining the quantum limit of passive imaging , 2016, 1609.00684.

[21]  Alexander Ling,et al.  Fault-tolerant and finite-error localization for point emitters within the diffraction limit. , 2016, Optics express.

[22]  Saikat Guha,et al.  Fundamental limit of resolving two point sources limited by an arbitrary point spread function , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT).

[23]  S. Lipson,et al.  An Introduction to Optical Stellar Interferometry: Frontmatter , 2006 .

[24]  J. Shapiro The Quantum Theory of Optical Communications , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[25]  Mankei Tsang,et al.  Quantum theory of superresolution for two incoherent optical point sources , 2015, 1511.00552.

[26]  Reck,et al.  Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[27]  Stefano Pirandola,et al.  Ultimate Precision Bound of Quantum and Subwavelength Imaging. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[28]  D. Gottesman,et al.  Longer-baseline telescopes using quantum repeaters. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[29]  L. Ballentine,et al.  Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory , 1982 .

[30]  M. Nussbaum,et al.  THE CHERNOFF LOWER BOUND FOR SYMMETRIC QUANTUM HYPOTHESIS TESTING , 2006, quant-ph/0607216.

[31]  Joe W. Gray,et al.  Single-molecule superresolution imaging allows quantitative analysis of RAF multimer formation and signaling , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  C. M. Care Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory: North-Holland Series in Statistics and Probability Vol 1 , 1983 .

[33]  Jaroslav Rehacek,et al.  Achieving the ultimate optical resolution , 2016, EPJ Web of Conferences.

[34]  Ericka Stricklin-Parker,et al.  Ann , 2005 .

[35]  Mankei Tsang,et al.  Far-Field Superresolution of Thermal Electromagnetic Sources at the Quantum Limit. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[36]  S. Ram,et al.  Beyond Rayleigh's criterion: a resolution measure with application to single-molecule microscopy. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  A. Holevo Statistical decision theory for quantum systems , 1973 .

[38]  Pu Jian,et al.  Programmable unitary spatial mode manipulation. , 2010, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[39]  J. Goodman Statistical Optics , 1985 .

[40]  Zach DeVito,et al.  Opt , 2017 .

[41]  JM Geremia Distinguishing between optical coherent states with imperfect detection (9 pages) , 2004 .

[42]  Hugo Ferretti,et al.  Beating Rayleigh's Curse by Imaging Using Phase Information. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[43]  J. L. Harris Resolving Power and Decision Theory , 1964 .

[44]  Joseph Horowitz,et al.  A statistical approach to the resolution of point sources , 1997 .

[45]  L. Mandel,et al.  Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics , 1995 .

[46]  Christoph Simon,et al.  Fisher information for far-field linear optical superresolution via homodyne or heterodyne detection in a higher-order local oscillator mode , 2017, 1706.08633.

[47]  H. V. Trees Detection, Estimation, And Modulation Theory , 2001 .

[48]  Mankei Tsang,et al.  Quantum information for semiclassical optics , 2016, SPIE/COS Photonics Asia.

[49]  Mankei Tsang,et al.  Quantum limit for two-dimensional resolution of two incoherent optical point sources , 2016, 2016 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[50]  Ke Li Discriminating quantum states: the multiple Chernoff distance , 2015, ArXiv.

[51]  Saikat Guha,et al.  LADAR resolution improvement using receivers enhanced with squeezed-vacuum injection and phase-sensitive amplification , 2010 .

[52]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[53]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Statistical and Information-Theoretic Analysis of Resolution in Imaging , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[54]  David A B Miller,et al.  Reconfigurable add-drop multiplexer for spatial modes. , 2013, Optics express.

[55]  Vahid Sandoghdar,et al.  Light microscopy: an ongoing contemporary revolution , 2014, 1412.3255.

[56]  C. Helstrom Quantum detection and estimation theory , 1969 .

[57]  M. Tsang Quantum nonlocality in weak-thermal-light interferometry. , 2011, Physical review letters.