Bottle house: utilising appreciative inquiry to develop a user acceptance model

This paper develops a novel user-acceptance model for circular solutions to housing design. The model has been systematically developed from a case study of an upcycled plastic bottle building in a low-income community in Nigeria. It is common practice to use participatory approaches to consult end users in communities, typically after design concepts have been proposed and conceptualised. However, this often leads to critical socio-cultural or usability elements being overlooked and the design being substandard. Therefore, this paper develops a robust model for designers, specialists and activists involved in construction that can be used during all phases of a project. This approach demonstrates that user needs should be considered before building designs and plans are generated, providing a greater frame of reference for practitioners, consultants and end users. Enabling the integration of holistic needs of the community and the development of circular design solution.,A case study methodology has been employed to develop this model, uses appreciative inquiry methodology. This includes multiple methods to capture end users’ perception: focus groups, interactions with the local community and self-recorded comments. This case study is part of a broader research project to develop replicable low-cost self-sufficient homes utilising local capacity using upcycled, locally available materials.,The findings identify the challenges associated with designing circular solution housing without a robust understanding of interrelated factors, which ensure sustainability and user acceptance. The conclusions demonstrate why essential socio-cultural factors, usually unrelated to technical development, should be understood and contextualised when designing sustainable solutions in low/middle-income communities. The authors argue that without this holistic approach, undesirable consequences may arise, often leading to more significant challenges. Instead of referring to multiple frameworks, this distinctive model can be used to evaluate user acceptance for low-cost housing in particular and other dimensions of circular solution design that involve end-user acceptance. The model blends circular solution dimensions with user-acceptance concerns offering a guide that considers essential features that are both user-friendly and pragmatic, such as utility, technological innovation and functionality as well as their intersectionality.,The research relied on a single case study, which focussed on end-user engagement of upcycling waste materials as an application of circular solutions. The model will contribute to developing socially accepted circular solutions taking into consideration local context factors.,The paper is proposing a model for user acceptance of circular construction materials relevant to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

[1]  Zbigniew Wzorek,et al.  The possible use of sewage sludge ash (SSA) in the construction industry as a way towards a circular economy , 2015 .

[2]  Khosrow Ghavami,et al.  Ultimate load behaviour of bamboo-reinforced lightweight concrete beams , 1995 .

[3]  HeijdenHans User acceptance of hedonic information systems , 2004 .

[4]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Handbook of Research on Contemporary Theoretical Models in Information Systems , 2009 .

[5]  C. Meyer The greening of the concrete industry , 2009 .

[6]  Petra Rudolf,et al.  Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering , 2016 .

[7]  Peter Gosling,et al.  Creative upcycling: Reconnecting people, materials and place through making , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[8]  Anthony Halog,et al.  Developing strategies for managing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia based on the concept of circular economy , 2017 .

[9]  F. Preston,et al.  A Global Redesign? Shaping the Circular Economy , 2012 .

[10]  Z. Muyen,et al.  Strength properties of plastic bottle bricks and their suitability as construction materials in Bangladesh , 2016 .

[11]  D. Davis The Arid Lands: History, Power, Knowledge , 2016 .

[12]  W. Stahel The circular economy , 2016, Nature.

[13]  Isabella McLafferty,et al.  METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN NURSING RESEARCH Focus group interviews as a data collecting strategy , 2004 .

[14]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[15]  G. Seyfang,et al.  Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda , 2007 .

[16]  Dennis Becker,et al.  Acceptance of Mobile Mental Health Treatment Applications , 2016, EUSPN/ICTH.

[17]  Keith R. Skene,et al.  The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context , 2015, Journal of Business Ethics.

[18]  P. Ritala,et al.  Exploring institutional drivers and barriers of the circular economy: A cross-regional comparison of China, the US, and Europe , 2017, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[19]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[20]  Ashraf Mansour Habib Mansour,et al.  Reusing waste plastic bottles as an alternative sustainable building material , 2015 .

[21]  J. Reed Appreciative Inquiry: Research for Change , 2006 .

[22]  Almir Sales,et al.  Use of Brazilian sugarcane bagasse ash in concrete as sand replacement. , 2010, Waste management.

[23]  Ruoyu Jin,et al.  An empirical study of perceptions towards construction and demolition waste recycling and reuse in China , 2017 .

[24]  Azra Korjenic,et al.  Development and performance evaluation of natural thermal-insulation materials composed of renewable resources , 2011 .

[25]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  THEORY OF REASONED ACTION , 2014 .

[26]  Kabiru Jinjiri Ringim,et al.  Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2020, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[27]  Arinola Adefila,et al.  Bottle house: A case study of transdisciplinary research for tackling global challenges , 2018, Habitat International.

[28]  Rawshan Ara Begum,et al.  Attitude and behavioral factors in waste management in the construction industry of Malaysia , 2009 .

[29]  Philip Vergragt,et al.  A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE – AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR THE RURAL POOR IN LESS DEVELOPED ECONOMIES , 2005 .

[30]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[31]  Francesco Pomponi,et al.  Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework , 2017 .

[32]  M. Davies,et al.  Participatory Action Research as a Framework for Transdisciplinary Collaboration: A Pilot Study on Healthy, Sustainable, Low‐Income Housing in Delhi, India , 2018, Global challenges.

[33]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research , 1988 .

[34]  S. Ulgiati,et al.  Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. A literature review , 2017 .

[35]  M. Ilić,et al.  Drivers for development of circular economy – A case study of Serbia , 2016 .

[36]  Mardiha Mokhtar,et al.  Application of plastic bottle as a wall structure for green house , 2015 .

[37]  K. Winans,et al.  The history and current applications of the circular economy concept , 2017 .

[38]  Xitong Guo,et al.  UNDERSTANDING THE ACCEPTANCE OF MOBILE HEALTH SERVICES: A COMPARISON AND INTEGRATION OF ALTERNATIVE MODELS , 2013 .

[39]  Boksun Kim,et al.  Behaviour of sand-filled plastic bottled clay panels for sustainable homes , 2019, Journal of Building Engineering.

[40]  Joseph Bradley The Technology Acceptance Model and Other User Acceptance Theories , 2009 .

[41]  Hao Tan,et al.  China's move to a Circular Economy as a development strategy , 2011 .

[42]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[43]  E. Hultink,et al.  The Circular Economy - A New Sustainability Paradigm? , 2017 .

[44]  Hamed Taherdoost,et al.  Development of an adoption model to assess user acceptance of e-service technology: E-Service Technology Acceptance Model , 2018, Behav. Inf. Technol..