Field feature detection and morphing-based process planning for fabrication of geometries and composition control for functionally graded materials

Abstract The inherent limitation of most solid freeform fabrication (SFF) is deposition in the form of layers. The set-up rather than the geometry and the material composition of the part becomes more important in the process planning. For a functionally graded material (FGM), the desired composition variation is of infinitesimal order; however, the finite size of the deposition head and the molten pool allows for a quantized volume addition. Such artificial imposition of the process for the desired geometric morphology and the functional gradience of materials limit the accuracy of the part. The frequent variation in the material composition is yet another issue associated with the fabrication of FGMs. The suitability of a field can be attributed to the desired material distribution of a part. Different features of the field are identified and used as the input for process planning. The mathematical morphing of the material gradience allows a smooth variation of the material composition across the geometry of the part during deposition. The paper describes a framework for FGM representation using maxel, process planning, and implementation of the fabrication of geometries, and the control of the material composition. The experimental results for the suggested approach are described.

[1]  Ki-Hoon Shin,et al.  An integrated CAD system for design of heterogeneous objects , 2000 .

[2]  L. Shaw,et al.  SFF-Oriented Modeling and Process Planning of Functionally Graded Materials using a Novel Equal Distance Offset Approach , 2004 .

[3]  Radovan Kovacevic,et al.  Automated torch path planning using polygon subdivision for solid freeform fabrication based on welding , 2004 .

[4]  S. T. Tan,et al.  Slicing and contours generation for fabricating heterogeneous objects , 2002, Geometric Modeling and Processing. Theory and Applications. GMP 2002. Proceedings.

[5]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  An approach to modeling multi-material objects , 1997, SMA '97.

[6]  Debasish Dutta,et al.  A method for the design and fabrication of heterogeneous objects , 2003 .

[7]  Radha Sarma,et al.  An assessment of geometric methods in trajectory synthesis for shape-creating manufacturing operations , 2000 .

[8]  J. Xi,et al.  Modeling and processing of functionally graded materials for rapid prototyping , 2004 .

[9]  S. T. Tan,et al.  Source-based' heterogeneous solid modeling , 2002, Comput. Aided Des..

[10]  M. L. Griffith,et al.  Multi-Material Processing By Lens , 1997 .

[11]  Todd Robert Jackson,et al.  Analysis of functionally graded material object representation methods , 2000 .

[12]  M. Cima,et al.  Modeling and designing functionally graded material components for fabrication with local composition control , 1999 .

[13]  Vadim Shapiro,et al.  Heterogeneous material modeling with distance fields , 2004, Comput. Aided Geom. Des..

[14]  E. M. Sachs,et al.  A Design and Post-processing System for Local Composition Control in Solid Freeform Fabrication , 2002 .

[15]  Debasish Dutta,et al.  Adaptive Slicing of Heterogeneous Solid Models for Layered Manufacturing , 1999 .

[16]  V. Kumar,et al.  An Approach to Modeling & Representation of Heterogeneous Objects , 1998 .

[17]  R. Kovacevic,et al.  Morphing based approach for process planning for fabrication of geometries and the control of material composition , 2004 .