Radiofrequency Dosimetry in Subjects Implanted with Metallic Structures Undergoing MRI: a Numerical Study

A numerical study to investigate the effects of the exposure to radiofrequency (RF) field on biological tissues implanted with thin metallic structures has been carried out, using the finite difference time domain (FDTD) solution technique. The particular case of the RF used in the clinical 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners has been studied. The results of the model show that the presence of a metallic wire yields to a significant increase in the local specific absorption rate (SAR) and in temperature around the implant. Present standards or guidelines do not specifically address this problem and use threshold levels and methods to define safe exposure conditions that cannot apply to reveal high SAR gradients, such as the ones generated by thin metallic implanted objects. In particular, an averaging mass of 10 g, typically used for SAR calculation to evaluate the effect of RF exposure of biological tissues, is too big if compared to the SAR gradient generated by thin metallic structures. The SAR estimation according to this method cannot be considered a reliable indicator to evaluate the potential damage due to the RF induced heating at the interface between the implant and biological tissues. Five wires of different lengths and thicknesses were simulated and the SAR at the wire tip was evaluated over 10g, 1g, 0.1g averaging mass: the SAR underestimation related to the 10g and 1g masses, compared to 0.1g mass, was greater than 90 % and 60 %, respectively. In conclusion, present standards cannot be applied to thin metallic implants. The amount of averaging mass should be chosen as a function of the dimension of the implanted object and of the SAR gradient that is generated around it. At the same time, the averaging volume has to be not too small to be just a single “hot spot”, not relevant for the evaluation of potential tissue damage due to RF exposure.

[1]  Giovanni Calcagnini,et al.  Numerical FDTD models of electromagnetic field generated by the RF coil of an MRI scanner: comparison among different solutions , 2008 .

[2]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Pacemaker Reed Switch Behavior in 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Units: Are Reed Switches Always Closed in Strong Magnetic Fields? , 2002, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[3]  Robert Fair,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  Jeffrey L Helfer,et al.  Can pacemakers, neurostimulators, leads, or guide wires be MRI safe? Technological concerns and possible resolutions. , 2006, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[5]  T. W. Athey,et al.  Specific absorption rate (SAR) in models of the human head exposed to hand-held UHF portable radios. , 1989, Bioelectromagnetics.

[6]  W. Kainz,et al.  MRI‐induced heating of selected thin wire metallic implants – laboratory and computational studies – findings and new questions raised , 2006, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[7]  N AamiPacemakerCommittee-EMCtaskforcePac,et al.  Active implantable medical devices-Electromagnetic compatibility-EMC test protocols for implantable cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators , 1999 .

[8]  W. Kainz,et al.  Complexity of MRI induced heating on metallic leads: Experimental measurements of 374 configurations , 2008, Biomedical engineering online.

[9]  N. Kuster,et al.  Energy absorption mechanism by biological bodies in the near field of dipole antennas above 300 MHz , 1992 .

[10]  J. Herbertz Comment on the ICNIRP guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998, Health physics.

[11]  G. Ziegelberger,et al.  International commission on non-ionizing radiation protection. , 2006, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[12]  Q. Balzano,et al.  Heating of biological tissue in the induction field of VHF portable radio transmitters , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[13]  J. A. Scott,et al.  A finite element model of heat transport in the human eye. , 1988, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  R. D. Saunders Biological effects of exposure to non-ionizing electromagnetic fields and radiation, III. Radiofrequency and microwave radiation , 1991 .

[15]  C. Goodman,et al.  Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health , 1988 .