Distinct biophysical mechanisms of focal adhesion kinase mechanoactivation by different extracellular matrix proteins

Significance Mechanical forces, which guide cellular functions, can be sensed and translated into biochemical information at focal adhesions, where cells physically connect to extracellular matrix (ECM) through transmembrane receptor integrins. Our results have identified that different ECM proteins, type 1 collagen (Col I) and fibronectin (FN), can either transmit or shield from mechanical forces when regulating crucial intracellular signaling, focal adhesion kinase (FAK), with their different accessibility to the corresponding integrin receptors. Whereas the integrin α2 binding site in Col I is constitutively accessible, mechanical tension is required to expose the integrin α5 binding motif in FN. This finding should advance our understanding on how cells perceive extracellular mechanical cues through natural surface materials. Matrix mechanics controls cell fate by modulating the bonds between integrins and extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. However, it remains unclear how fibronectin (FN), type 1 collagen, and their receptor integrin subtypes distinctly control force transmission to regulate focal adhesion kinase (FAK) activity, a crucial molecular signal governing cell adhesion/migration. Here we showed, using a genetically encoded FAK biosensor based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer, that FN-mediated FAK activation is dependent on the mechanical tension, which may expose its otherwise hidden FN synergy site to integrin α5. In sharp contrast, the ligation between the constitutively exposed binding motif of type 1 collagen and its receptor integrin α2 was surprisingly tension-independent to induce sufficient FAK activation. Although integrin α subunit determines mechanosensitivity, the ligation between α subunit and the ECM proteins converges at the integrin β1 activation to induce FAK activation. We further discovered that the interaction of the N-terminal protein 4.1/ezrin/redixin/moesin basic patch with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate is crucial during cell adhesion to maintain the FAK activation from the inhibitory effect of nearby protein 4.1/ezrin/redixin/moesin acidic sites. Therefore, different ECM proteins either can transmit or can shield from mechanical forces to regulate cellular functions, with the accessibility of ECM binding motifs by their specific integrin α subunits determining the biophysical mechanisms of FAK activation during mechanotransduction.

[1]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[2]  M. Humphries,et al.  Dual Functionality of the Anti-β1 Integrin Antibody, 12G10, Exemplifies Agonistic Signalling from the Ligand Binding Pocket of Integrin Adhesion Receptors* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Matrix-specific suppression of integrin activation in shear stress signaling. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.

[4]  C. Carman,et al.  Structural basis of integrin regulation and signaling. , 2007, Annual review of immunology.

[5]  Saulo H. P. Oliveira,et al.  FERM domain interaction with myosin negatively regulates FAK in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. , 2011, Nature chemical biology.

[6]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[7]  J. Takagi,et al.  Classification of ‘activation’ antibodies against integrin β1 chain , 1997, FEBS letters.

[8]  N. Carragher,et al.  Calpain 2 and Src dependence distinguishes mesenchymal and amoeboid modes of tumour cell invasion: a link to integrin function , 2006, Oncogene.

[9]  P. Arratia,et al.  Absence of filamin A prevents cells from responding to stiffness gradients on gels coated with collagen but not fibronectin. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[10]  M. Eck,et al.  FERM Domain Interaction Promotes FAK Signaling , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[11]  S. McLaughlin,et al.  Binding of neomycin to phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2). , 1989, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[12]  Shaoying Lu,et al.  Substrate rigidity regulates Ca2+ oscillation via RhoA pathway in stem cells , 2009, Journal of cellular physiology.

[13]  D. E. Discher,et al.  Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage — Soluble factors that limit osteogenesis , 2009 .

[14]  Ning Wang,et al.  Rapid signal transduction in living cells is a unique feature of mechanotransduction , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  David Boettiger,et al.  Mechanically Activated Integrin Switch Controls α5β1 Function , 2009, Science.

[16]  Kristopher E Kubow,et al.  Fibronectin in aging extracellular matrix fibrils is progressively unfolded by cells and elicits an enhanced rigidity response. , 2008, Faraday discussions.

[17]  C. Cabañas,et al.  Structural requirements for alpha 1 beta 1 and alpha 2 beta 1 integrin mediated cell adhesion to collagen V. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[18]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Force‐dependent integrin–cytoskeleton linkage formation requires downregulation of focal complex dynamics by Shp2 , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[19]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Spatial-temporal reorganization of activated integrins , 2012, Cell adhesion & migration.

[20]  Taekjip Ha,et al.  Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics , 2010, Nature.

[21]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  A specific alpha5beta1-integrin conformation promotes directional integrin translocation and fibronectin matrix formation. , 2005, Journal of cell science.

[22]  David J. Mooney,et al.  Harnessing Traction-Mediated Manipulation of the Cell-Matrix Interface to Control Stem Cell Fate , 2010, Nature materials.

[23]  Catherine D Reyes,et al.  Engineering integrin-specific surfaces with a triple-helical collagen-mimetic peptide. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[24]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  A specific α5β1-integrin conformation promotes directional integrin translocation and fibronectin matrix formation , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[25]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Stretching Single Talin Rod Molecules Activates Vinculin Binding , 2009, Science.

[26]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Direct transmembrane clustering and cytoplasmic dimerization of focal adhesion kinase initiates its tyrosine phosphorylation. , 2002, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[27]  David Boettiger,et al.  A novel mode for integrin-mediated signaling: tethering is required for phosphorylation of FAK Y397. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[28]  K. Beningo,et al.  An in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity, substrate rigidity, and ECM composition , 2011, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[29]  A. Samarel,et al.  GFP-FRNK Disrupts Focal Adhesions and Induces Anoikis in Neonatal Rat Ventricular Myocytes , 2002, Circulation research.

[30]  N. Balaban,et al.  Adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[31]  Renhao Li,et al.  Activation of integrin alphaIIbbeta3 by modulation of transmembrane helix associations. , 2003, Science.

[32]  Ken Jacobson,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Regulation of Focal Adhesion Kinase Activity in Living Cells , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[33]  Jin Zhang,et al.  The Spatiotemporal Pattern of Src Activation at Lipid Rafts Revealed by Diffusion-Corrected FRET Imaging , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[34]  B. Leitinger,et al.  Transmembrane collagen receptors. , 2011, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[35]  Junichi Takagi,et al.  Structure of integrin α5β1 in complex with fibronectin , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[36]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Force-Induced Unfolding of Fibronectin in the Extracellular Matrix of Living Cells , 2007, PLoS biology.

[37]  Martin A. Schwartz,et al.  Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[38]  David A Calderwood,et al.  Integrin β cytoplasmic domain interactions with phosphotyrosine-binding domains: A structural prototype for diversity in integrin signaling , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  S. Chien,et al.  Detection of focal adhesion kinase activation at membrane microdomains by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. , 2011, Nature communications.

[40]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Force Sensing by Mechanical Extension of the Src Family Kinase Substrate p130Cas , 2006, Cell.

[41]  Sungsoo Na,et al.  Dynamic force-induced direct dissociation of protein complexes in a nuclear body in living cells , 2012, Nature Communications.

[42]  D. G. T. Strange,et al.  Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. , 2012, Nature materials.

[43]  D. A. Hanson,et al.  Focal adhesion kinase: in command and control of cell motility , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[44]  D. Stamenović,et al.  Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.