Mining Domain-specific Component-Action Links for Technical Support Documents

IT service support data such as user queries, resolutions done by agents, technical documents are very complex. It is very important to accurately identify the key components and the actions performed on them to better assist applications, such as knowledge extraction and ingestion, search, query, and support chat-bots. Extracting components and correctly linking them to the required actions would also benefit the problem remediation process by drastically reducing the time to resolve and helping the engineers to focus on the steps or section of the document that are relevant and needed to solve the issue. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of four approaches to establish links between mentioned components and actions on technical support documents.

[1]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Entity Linking with a Knowledge Base: Issues, Techniques, and Solutions , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[2]  Jing Jiang,et al.  Extracting and Normalizing Entity-Actions from Users’ Comments , 2012, COLING.

[3]  Daniel Jurafsky,et al.  Shallow Semantic Parsing using Support Vector Machines , 2004, NAACL.

[4]  Esko Ukkonen,et al.  AQL: an Alignment Based Language for Querying String Databases , 1998 .

[5]  Tome Eftimov,et al.  Grammar and Dictionary based Named-entity Linking for Knowledge Extraction of Evidence-based Dietary Recommendations , 2016, KDIR.

[6]  Gargi Dasgupta,et al.  Domain Knowledge Driven Key Term Extraction for IT Services , 2018, ICSOC.

[7]  Gargi Dasgupta,et al.  Semantic Parsing for Technical Support Questions , 2018, COLING.

[8]  Ralf Zimmer,et al.  RelEx - Relation extraction using dependency parse trees , 2007, Bioinform..

[9]  Olga Babko-Malaya,et al.  PropBank Annotation Guidelines , 2010 .

[10]  Roberto Navigli,et al.  Entity Linking meets Word Sense Disambiguation: a Unified Approach , 2014, TACL.

[11]  Daniel Gildea,et al.  Automatic Labeling of Semantic Roles , 2000, ACL.

[12]  Steven Bethard,et al.  A Survey on Recent Advances in Named Entity Recognition from Deep Learning models , 2018, COLING.

[13]  Roi Blanco,et al.  Lightweight Multilingual Entity Extraction and Linking , 2017, WSDM.

[14]  Olivier Raiman,et al.  DeepType: Multilingual Entity Linking by Neural Type System Evolution , 2018, AAAI.

[15]  Weidong Xiao,et al.  Entity Linking via Symmetrical Attention-Based Neural Network and Entity Structural Features , 2019, Symmetry.

[16]  Yanan Cao,et al.  Joint Entity Linking with Deep Reinforcement Learning , 2019, WWW.

[17]  Helmut Schmidt,et al.  Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees , 1994 .

[18]  Mark Johnson,et al.  An Improved Non-monotonic Transition System for Dependency Parsing , 2015, EMNLP.

[19]  Xiaolong Wang,et al.  Modeling Mention, Context and Entity with Neural Networks for Entity Disambiguation , 2015, IJCAI.

[20]  Michael Roth,et al.  Composition of Word Representations Improves Semantic Role Labelling , 2014, EMNLP.

[21]  Luciano Del Corro,et al.  ClausIE: clause-based open information extraction , 2013, WWW.

[22]  Gabor Angeli,et al.  Language-Independent Discriminative Parsing of Temporal Expressions , 2013, ACL.

[23]  Frederick Reiss,et al.  SystemT: An Algebraic Approach to Declarative Information Extraction , 2010, ACL.

[24]  Shuang Chen,et al.  Improving Entity Linking by Modeling Latent Entity Type Information , 2020, AAAI.

[25]  Satoshi Sekine,et al.  A survey of named entity recognition and classification , 2007 .

[26]  Yang Deng,et al.  A Knowledge Graph Based Solution for Entity Discovery and Linking in Open-Domain Questions , 2017, SmartCom.

[27]  Yueting Zhuang,et al.  Learning Dynamic Context Augmentation for Global Entity Linking , 2019, EMNLP.

[28]  Daniel S. Weld,et al.  Design Challenges for Entity Linking , 2015, TACL.

[29]  Marti A. Hearst.  Automatic Acquisition of Hyponyms from Large Text Corpora , 1992, COLING.

[30]  Thierry Charnois,et al.  Symptom recognition issue , 2014 .