Chapter Eight – The Politics of Attention: Differences in Visual Cognition Between Liberals and Conservatives

Decades of research have provided important insight into the factors that drive human behavior. As opposed to just focusing on the separate contributions of nature versus nurture, behavior is now better conceptualized as being complex and multifaceted, meaning that a complete understanding of behavior can only be gleaned from investigating any and all factors that have the potential to be influential (biological, physiological, etc.). One individual differences variable that has received little attention from psychologists is political temperament despite the fact that a growing body of research finds that political orientations vary with an array of broader constructs. In this chapter, we summarize recent research using classic cognitive (and vision science) paradigms (gaze cueing, free viewing, visual search) to elucidate the differences between political conservatives and liberals. Although these correlations are not causal, they provide important insight into the types of factors (eg, biological) that could influence one's political beliefs and subsequent behavior. Moreover, they demonstrate important individual differences in behavior that can easily go unnoticed if they are not directly investigated.

[1]  M. Fenske,et al.  Modulation of focused attention by faces expressing emotion: evidence from flanker tasks. , 2003, Emotion.

[2]  N. Martin,et al.  Is There a “Party” in Your Genes? , 2009 .

[3]  J. Grose-Fifer,et al.  Attentional capture by emotional faces in adolescence , 2010, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[4]  Kevin B. Smith,et al.  Not by Twins Alone: Using the Extended Family Design to Investigate Genetic Influence on Political Beliefs , 2010 .

[5]  M. Bradley,et al.  The International Affective Picture System (IAPS) in the study of emotion and attention. , 2007 .

[6]  Salvatore Maria Aglioti,et al.  Follow My Eyes: The Gaze of Politicians Reflexively Captures the Gaze of Ingroup Voters , 2011, PloS one.

[7]  G. Marcus The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics , 2002 .

[8]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  James R. Bergen,et al.  Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination , 1983, Nature.

[10]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Attention to Arrows: Pointing to a New Direction , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  P. Merikle,et al.  Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.

[12]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  The joint Simon effect: a review and theoretical integration , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[13]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Visual Attention and the Semantics of Space , 2006, Psychological science.

[14]  Charles S. Carver,et al.  Action, Emotion, and Personality: Emerging Conceptual Integration , 2000 .

[15]  Gernot Horstmann,et al.  Preattentive face processing: What do visual search experiments with schematic faces tell us? , 2007 .

[16]  N. Carlson Physiology of behavior , 1977 .

[17]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[18]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Attentional effects of counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  J. Jonides Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[20]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The effect of speed-accuracy strategy on response interference control in Parkinson's disease , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  J. Eastwood,et al.  Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotion and motivation. , 2007 .

[23]  J. Gray,et al.  Contextual Effects on Choice Reaction Time and Accuracy in Acute and Chronic Schizophrenics Impairment in Selective Attention or in the Influence of Prior Learning? , 1991, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[24]  Luigi Castelli,et al.  The Automatic Conservative: Ideology-Based Attentional Asymmetries in the Processing of Valenced Information , 2011, PloS one.

[25]  Daniel Lundqvist,et al.  Looking for foes and friends: perceptual and emotional factors when finding a face in the crowd. , 2005, Emotion.

[26]  Edna B. Foa,et al.  Attentional Biases for Facial Expressions in Social Phobia: The Face-in-the-Crowd Paradigm , 1999 .

[27]  Jennifer Burns Goddess of the Market: Ayn Rand and the American Right , 2009 .

[28]  N. Martin,et al.  A Genome-Wide Analysis of Liberal and Conservative Political Attitudes , 2011 .

[29]  C. H. Hansen,et al.  Finding the face in the crowd : An anger superiority effect , 1988 .

[30]  L. Damjanovic,et al.  The eyes are sufficient to produce a threat superiority effect. , 2006, Emotion.

[31]  S. Hutton,et al.  Age differences in emotion recognition skills and the visual scanning of emotion faces. , 2007, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[32]  J. R. Alford,et al.  Are Political Orientations Genetically Transmitted? , 2005, American Political Science Review.

[33]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  J. Tanaka,et al.  The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants , 2009, Psychiatry Research.

[35]  Elkan G. Akyürek,et al.  Symbolic control of attention: Tracking its temporal dynamics , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[36]  F. Esteves Attentional bias to emotional facial expressions , 1999 .

[37]  Kevin B. Smith,et al.  Linking Genetics and Political Attitudes: Reconceptualizing Political Ideology , 2011 .

[38]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  The eyes have it!: An fMRI investigation , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[39]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Are intuitive physics and intuitive psychology independent? A test with children with Asperger Syndrome. , 2001 .

[40]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Look at me, I'm smiling: Visual search for threatening and nonthreatening facial expressions , 2005 .

[41]  R. Remington,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Chad R. Mortensen,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Single-and Multiple-target Visual Search Tasks , 2022 .

[43]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[44]  M. Rutherford,et al.  The face in the crowd effect: Threat-detection advantage with perceptually intermediate distractors , 2009 .

[45]  Alison L. Chasteen,et al.  Thinking of God moves attention , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  G. Wilson,et al.  A new measure of conservatism. , 1968, The British journal of social and clinical psychology.

[47]  J R Simon,et al.  Processing symbolic information from a visual display: interference from an irrelevant directional cue. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[48]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. , 1984 .

[49]  J. Vigil Political leanings vary with facial expression processing and psychosocial functioning , 2010 .

[50]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Another advanced test of theory of mind: evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or asperger syndrome. , 1997, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[51]  K. Arnell,et al.  Capturing and holding attention: The impact of emotional words in rapid serial visual presentation , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[52]  B. Tiplady,et al.  Assessment of driver impairment: Evaluation of a two-choice tester using ethanol , 2005 .

[53]  G. Horstmann,et al.  Search asymmetries with real faces: testing the anger-superiority effect. , 2006, Emotion.

[54]  Kevin B. Smith,et al.  Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits , 2008, Science.

[55]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  A new form of human spatial attention: Automated symbolic orienting , 2012 .

[56]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Attentional control and reflexive orienting to gaze and arrow cues , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[57]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  E. Fox,et al.  Facial Expressions of Emotion: Are Angry Faces Detected More Efficiently? , 2000, Cognition & emotion.

[59]  H. Eysenck,et al.  Transmission of social attitudes. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  C. Eriksen,et al.  The flankers task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems , 1995 .

[61]  J. Gray,et al.  A Critique of Eysenck’s Theory of Personality , 1981 .

[62]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[63]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[64]  J. Block,et al.  Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later , 2006 .

[65]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Automated Symbolic Orienting: The Missing Link , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[66]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Obama cares about visuo-spatial attention: Perception of political figures moves attention and determines gaze direction , 2015, Behavioural Brain Research.

[67]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[68]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity is task dependent: evidence from selective search. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[69]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze , 1998 .

[70]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[71]  S. Yantis,et al.  New objects dominate luminance transients in setting attentional priority. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[72]  Luigi Castelli,et al.  Ideology is related to basic cognitive processes involved in attitude formation , 2011 .

[73]  Michael W. Eysenck,et al.  Trait anxiety, anxious mood, and threat detection. , 1995 .

[74]  S. Tipper,et al.  Sex differences in eye gaze and symbolic cueing of attention , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.