The effect of accessing nonmatching documents on relevance feedback

Traditional information retrieval (IR) systems only allow users access to documents that match their current query, and therefore, users can only give relevance feedback on matching documents (or those with a matching strength greater than a set threshold. This article shows that, in systems that allow access to nonmatching documents (e.g., hybrid hypertext and information retrieval systems), the strength of the effect of giving relevance feedback varies between matching and nonmatching documents. For positive feedback the results shown here are encouraging, as they can be justified by an intuitive view of the process. However, for negative feedback the results show behavior that cannot easily be justified and that varies greatly depending on the model of feedback used.

[1]  Alan F. Smeaton Linguistic Approaches to Text Management : An Appraisal of Progress , 1995 .

[2]  C. J. van Rijsbergen,et al.  An Evaluation of feedback in Document Retrieval using Co‐Occurrence Data , 1978, J. Documentation.

[3]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Using Probabilistic Models of Document Retrieval without Relevance Information , 1979, J. Documentation.

[4]  Gerard Salton,et al.  The SMART Retrieval System , 1971 .

[5]  IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg,et al.  Incremental relevance feedback , 1992, SIGIR '92.

[6]  Mark D. Dunlop,et al.  Hypermedia and Free Text Retrieval , 1993, Inf. Process. Manag..

[7]  Stephen E. Robertson,et al.  Relevance weighting of search terms , 1976, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Ricardo Baeza-Yates,et al.  Information Retrieval: Data Structures and Algorithms , 1992 .

[9]  J. J. Rocchio,et al.  Relevance feedback in information retrieval , 1971 .

[10]  S. Robertson The probability ranking principle in IR , 1997 .

[11]  L. R. Rasmussen,et al.  In information retrieval: data structures and algorithms , 1992 .

[12]  Alexander Dekhtyar,et al.  Information Retrieval , 2018, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[13]  Donna K. Harman,et al.  Relevance feedback revisited , 1992, SIGIR '92.

[14]  Keith Duncan,et al.  Cognitive Engineering , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[15]  Donna K. Harman,et al.  Relevance Feedback and Other Query Modification Techniques , 1992, Information retrieval (Boston).

[16]  C. J. V. Rijsbergen,et al.  Information calculus for information retrieval , 1996 .

[17]  Fabrizio Sebastiani,et al.  A probabilistic terminological logic for modelling information retrieval , 1994, SIGIR '94.

[18]  C. J. van Rijsbergen,et al.  Information Calculus for Information Retrieval , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[19]  E. N. Ide Relevance feedback in an automatic document retrieval system , 1969 .

[20]  Mark Sanderson,et al.  NRT: News Retrieval Tool , 1991, Electron. Publ..

[21]  D DunlopMark The effect of accessing nonmatching documents on relevance feedback , 1997 .

[22]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Relevance feedback and inference networks , 1993, SIGIR.