An algorithmic method for determining the kinetic system of receptor-channel complexes.

The mathematical study of receptor-channel kinetics involving numerous sites and conformations of the channel calls for specific analytic methods generally based on stochastic formulation in terms of Markov processes. These methods allow the determination of the number of states from the experimental data. When the number of states is known, it is necessary to try numerous kinetic diagrams to find the best one. The construction of the kinetic diagram and the corresponding kinetic system are based on physiological hypotheses. When the number of states is large, the kinetic schema becomes difficult to establish. We present a method that uses an algorithmic scheme to deduce a kinetic system directly from physiological hypotheses. This method takes into account any number of ligands and sites. The set of all the states given by the combination of site occupation and channel conformations is reduced by using two types of hypothesis: (1) molecular constraints that specify the transitions physically possible between states and (2) kinetic considerations related to the assumed physiology of the system, which gives the conditions necessary for a transition between two states. These hypotheses are expressed in terms of rules operating on the initial states of transitions. The expression of rules does not ensure their coherence (i.e., the fact that each kinetic transition is defined by one and only one rule). A mathematical condition has been found that ensures the coherence of rules. When coherence has been established, the corresponding dynamic system can be automatically generated. Because the rules are established in a systematic way and their coherence can be mathematically established, the computer implementation of this method makes it easy to test various kinetic hypotheses for problems where the number of states is large.

[1]  M. Mayer,et al.  A kinetic analysis of the modulation of N‐methyl‐D‐aspartic acid receptors by glycine in mouse cultured hippocampal neurones. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  D. Colquhoun,et al.  Rapid decay of averaged single-channel NMDA receptor activations recorded at low agonist concentration , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  CE Jahr,et al.  Interactions between the glycine and glutamate binding sites of the NMDA receptor , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  L. Nowak,et al.  The role of divalent cations in the N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate responses of mouse central neurones in culture. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  L. Nowak,et al.  Mechanisms of blockade of excitatory amino acid receptor channels. , 1990, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[6]  A G Hawkes,et al.  Relaxation and fluctuations of membrane currents that flow through drug-operated channels , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  R J Bauer,et al.  Theory of the kinetic analysis of patch-clamp data. , 1987, Biophysical journal.

[8]  D. Rodbard Mathematics of Hormone-Receptor Interaction , 1973 .

[9]  P. Kienker Equivalence of aggregated Markov models of ion-channel gating , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[10]  A. Thomson,et al.  Glycine enhances NMDA-receptor mediated synaptic potentials in neocortical slices , 1989, Nature.

[11]  P. Lory,et al.  Zinc has opposite effects on NMDA and Non-NMDA receptors expressed in xenopus oocytes , 1990, Neuron.

[12]  B. Katz,et al.  Quantal components of the end‐plate potential , 1954, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  C. Stevens,et al.  NMDA receptors at excitatory synapses in the hippocampus: test of a theory of magnesium block , 1993, Neuroscience Letters.

[14]  P. Ascher,et al.  Equilibrium and kinetic study of glycine action on the N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor in cultured mouse brain neurons. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Action of brief pulses of glutamate on AMPA/kainate receptors in patches from different neurones of rat hippocampal slices. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  J. Jacquez Compartmental analysis in biology and medicine , 1985 .

[17]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Quantal components of unitary EPSCs at the mossy fibre synapse on CA3 pyramidal cells of rat hippocampus. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  H. D. Miller,et al.  The Theory Of Stochastic Processes , 1977, The Mathematical Gazette.

[19]  M. Mayer,et al.  Structure-activity relationships for amino acid transmitter candidates acting at N-methyl-D-aspartate and quisqualate receptors , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  Bernard,et al.  Advances in Drug Research , 1964 .

[21]  G. Westbrook,et al.  Kinetics of AP5 dissociation from NMDA receptors: evidence for two identical cooperative binding sites. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  C. Jahr,et al.  High probability opening of NMDA receptor channels by L-glutamate. , 1992, Science.

[23]  CE Jahr,et al.  NMDA channel behavior depends on agonist affinity , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  B. Hille Ionic channels of excitable membranes , 2001 .

[25]  F G Ball,et al.  Ion-channel gating mechanisms: model identification and parameter estimation from single channel recordings , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[26]  C. Stevens,et al.  Voltage dependence of NMDA-activated macroscopic conductances predicted by single-channel kinetics , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  D. Jenkinson The antagonism between tubocurarine and substances which depolarize the motor end‐plate , 1960, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  L. Vyklický,et al.  Regulation of NMDA receptor desensitization in mouse hippocampal neurons by glycine , 1989, Nature.

[29]  B. Katz,et al.  A study of the ‘desensitization’ produced by acetylcholine at the motor end‐plate , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  A. J. Clark The Rate of Action of Drugs on Cells , 1937 .

[31]  M. Mayer,et al.  Structure‐activity analysis of binding kinetics for NMDA receptor competitive antagonists: the influence of conformational restriction , 1991, British journal of pharmacology.

[32]  P. Ascher,et al.  Glycine-insensitive desensitization of NMDA responses in cultured mouse embryonic neurons , 1990, Neuron.

[33]  David Colquhoun,et al.  Lectures on biostatistics , 1972 .

[34]  W. Paton,et al.  A theory of drug action based on the rate of drug-receptor combination , 1961, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[35]  M. Mayer,et al.  Kinetic analysis of antagonist action at N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors. Two binding sites each for glutamate and glycine. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[36]  J. Black,et al.  Perspectives on receptor classification , 1987 .