Qualitative assessment and global mapping of supercritical CO2 power cycle technology

Abstract Worldwide attempts are being made to harness wasted heat or optimize the power systems by achieving the theoretical efficiency of the supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO2) power cycle. The heterogeneity and variable quality of scholarly data may challenge researchers of the field (S-CO2 power cycle) to survey all of the available information. This study is focused on scientometric analysis to provide deep insights into global research performance and the collaborative architectonical structure. It reveals the progressive research trend (2000–2019) of the Supercritical Carbon dioxide (S-CO2) power cycle and hotspot areas by considering various quantitative measures. The sophisticated altimetric model was employed to analyze scientific researches that originated from Scopus Elsevier and Web of Science. Quantitative measures include the contribution of countries, organizations, authors, funding agencies, and journals that were investigated and ranked. Moreover, a scientific mapping approach is applied to identifying the cross-connections of each quantitative measure. It is indicated that the S-CO2 power cycle focused research increased exponentially from 2010. National Natural Science Foundation of China, USA Department of Energy, and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities are leading sponsor agencies. USA Department of Energy, Xian Jiao Tong University, and Korea Advance Institute of Science and Technology are the most productive organizations. Similarly, Energy, Applied Thermal Engineering, and Energy Conversion and Management are top productive journals. At the same time, the USA, China, and South Korea are leading countries, and Lee, Jeong Ik Dai, Yiping Lee, and Jekyoung are the most dominating Authors in the S-CO2 power cycle technology developmental contributions. The core study areas include layout configuration with other power cycles, especially the Brayton cycle, optimization of operating conditions, and design of heat exchangers. S-CO2 higher condensation temperature and the need for cooling media below ambient conditions is the big challenge in hot geographic regions. Dynamic modeling with integrated optimization, the study on compactness, simplicity of the S-CO2 power configuration as well as improving condensation temperature could be more hotspot areas in future research.

[1]  Ricardo Chacartegui,et al.  Alternative cycles based on carbon dioxide for central receiver solar power plants , 2011 .

[2]  Brian D. Iverson,et al.  Review of high-temperature central receiver designs for concentrating solar power , 2014 .

[3]  P. Strakey,et al.  12 – Fossil energy , 2017 .

[4]  Hiroshi Yamaguchi,et al.  Analysis of a novel solar energy-powered Rankine cycle for combined power and heat generation using supercritical carbon dioxide , 2006 .

[5]  M. A. Reyes-Belmonte,et al.  Optimization of a recompression supercritical carbon dioxide cycle for an innovative central receiver solar power plant , 2016 .

[6]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  A scientometric analysis and visualization of global green building research , 2019, Building and Environment.

[7]  W. Zhou,et al.  A retrospective analysis with bibliometric of energy security in 2000–2017 , 2018, Energy Reports.

[8]  Ruochen Zeng,et al.  A review of research on embodied energy of buildings using bibliometric analysis , 2017 .

[9]  Emmanuel Hache,et al.  Renewable energy source integration into power networks, research trends and policy implications: A bibliometric and research actors survey analysis , 2019, Energy Policy.

[10]  Francisco G. Montoya,et al.  The research on energy in spain: A scientometric approach , 2014 .

[11]  C. S. Turchi,et al.  11 – Concentrating solar power , 2017 .

[12]  Mujid S. Kazimi,et al.  Efficiency of hydrogen production systems using alternative nuclear energy technologies , 2006 .

[13]  J. J. Sienicki,et al.  13 – Nuclear power , 2017 .

[14]  Hadrien Benoit,et al.  Dense suspension of solid particles as a new heat transfer fluid for concentrated solar thermal plants: on-sun proof of concept , 2013 .

[15]  F. Haglind,et al.  Recent research trends in organic Rankine cycle technology: A bibliometric approach , 2018 .

[16]  Anestis I. Kalfas,et al.  Recuperators investigation for high temperature supercritical carbon dioxide power generation cycles , 2017 .

[17]  G. Shen,et al.  Scientometric review of global research trends on green buildings in construction journals from 1992 to 2018 , 2019, Energy and Buildings.

[18]  Arash Nemati,et al.  Exergy, economic and environmental impact assessment and optimization of a novel cogeneration system including a gas turbine, a supercritical CO2 and an organic Rankine cycle (GT-HRSG/SCO2) , 2017 .

[19]  Jian Zuo,et al.  Characteristics and trends of research on waste-to-energy incineration: A bibliometric analysis, 1999–2015 , 2016 .

[20]  Yiping Dai,et al.  Parametric optimization design for supercritical CO2 power cycle using genetic algorithm and artificial neural network , 2010 .

[21]  Francisco G. Montoya,et al.  A fast method for identifying worldwide scientific collaborations using the Scopus database , 2018, Telematics Informatics.

[22]  Lei Shi,et al.  Heterogeneity of industrial development and evolution of cleaner production: Bibliometric analysis based on JCLP , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[23]  Jeong-Ik Lee,et al.  Potential advantages of coupling supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle to water cooled small and medium size reactor , 2012 .

[24]  Daniel Favrat,et al.  Transcritical or supercritical CO2 cycles using both low- and high-temperature heat sources , 2012 .

[25]  C. Turchi,et al.  Supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle design and configuration optimization to minimize levelized cost of energy of molten salt power towers operating at 650 °C , 2019, Solar Energy.

[26]  Brian D. Iverson,et al.  Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for solar-thermal energy , 2013 .

[27]  Pardeep Garg,et al.  Supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle for concentrated solar power , 2013 .

[28]  Huibin Du,et al.  Past, current and future of biomass energy research: A bibliometric analysis , 2015 .

[29]  Seungjoon Baik,et al.  Review of supercritical CO2 power cycle technology and current status of research and development , 2015 .

[30]  J. Moore 9 – Auxiliary equipment , 2017 .

[31]  Guozhu Mao,et al.  Way forward for alternative energy research: A bibliometric analysis during 1994–2013 , 2015 .

[32]  W. Rohrer Waste-Heat Recovery , 2001 .

[33]  Sung Ho Park,et al.  Thermodynamic and economic investigation of coal-fired power plant combined with various supercritical CO2 Brayton power cycle , 2018 .

[34]  Neng Shen,et al.  Mapping renewable energy subsidy policy research published from 1997 to 2018: A scientometric review , 2020, Utilities Policy.

[35]  A. Inés Fernández,et al.  Where is Thermal Energy Storage (TES) research going? – A bibliometric analysis , 2020 .

[36]  D. Thimsen,et al.  Research and development: Essentials, efforts, and future trends , 2017 .

[37]  C. Turchi,et al.  A Comparison of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycle Configurations with an Emphasis on CSP Applications , 2013 .

[38]  G. Musgrove,et al.  1 – Introduction and background , 2017 .

[39]  Abbas Rohani,et al.  Identification of effective factors to select energy recovery technologies from municipal solid waste using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM): A review of thermochemical technologies , 2020 .

[40]  Ming-Yueh Tsay,et al.  A scientometric study of heat transfer journal literature from 1900 to 2017 , 2018, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer.

[41]  Ning Huang,et al.  Research on biomass energy and environment from the past to the future: A bibliometric analysis. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[42]  E. Rubin,et al.  The cost of CO2 capture and storage , 2015 .

[43]  K. Nithyanandam,et al.  Cost and performance analysis of concentrating solar power systems with integrated latent thermal energy storage , 2014 .

[44]  Li He,et al.  Chinese energy and fuels research priorities and trend: A bibliometric analysis , 2016 .

[45]  Qing Yang,et al.  Bibliometric and visualized analysis of China's coal research 2000–2015 , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[46]  Fahad A. Al-Sulaiman,et al.  Performance comparison of different supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower , 2015 .

[47]  P. Dutta,et al.  Supercritical Carbon Dioxide-Based Power Cycles , 2017 .

[48]  C. Turchi,et al.  Thermodynamic Study of Advanced Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycles for Concentrating Solar Power Systems , 2013 .

[49]  Alessandro Simeone,et al.  Industrial waste heat recovery: A systematic approach , 2018, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments.

[50]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Assessment on the research trend of low-carbon energy technology investment: A bibliometric analysis , 2016 .

[51]  David Sánchez,et al.  Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review , 2017 .