Explanations at Multiple Levels1

The preference for `reductive explanations', i.e., explanations of the behaviour of a system at one `basic' level of sub-systems, seems to be related, at least in the physical sciences, to the success of a formal technique –- perturbation theory –- for extracting insight into the workings of a system from a supposedly exact but intractable mathematical description of the system. This preference for a style of explanation, however, can be justified only in the case of `regular' perturbation problems in which the zeroth-order term in the perturbation expansion (characterizing the `basic' level) is the uniform limit of the exact solution as the perturbation parameter goes to zero. For the much more frequent case of `singular' perturbation problems, various techniques have been developed which all introduce a hierarchy of levels or scales into the solutions. These levels describe processes or sub-systems operating simultaneously at different time or spatial scales. No single level, no reductive explanation in the above sense will provide an adequate explanation of the system behaviour. Explanations involving multiple levels should be recognized as far more common even in supposedly reductionist disciplines like physics.

[1]  Robert W. Batterman,et al.  Theories between theories: Asymptotic limiting intertheoretic relations , 1995, Synthese.

[2]  Horia Ene,et al.  Thermal Flows in Porous Media , 1987 .

[3]  K. Friedrichs Asymptotic phenomena in mathematical physics , 1955 .

[4]  H. Ene Thermal flow , 1996 .

[5]  Robert C. Richardson,et al.  Emergent Phenomena and Complex Systems , 1992 .

[6]  N. Cartwright Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement , 1995 .

[7]  Petar V. Kokotovic,et al.  Singular perturbation techniques in control theory , 1987 .

[8]  P. Anderson Basic Notions of Condensed Matter Physics , 1983 .

[9]  Robert W. Batterman,et al.  ‘Into a Mist’: Asymptotic theories on a caustic , 1997 .

[10]  H. Putnam Philosophy and our Mental Life , 2002 .

[11]  H. Primas Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reductionism , 1981 .

[12]  S. Sarkar Models of reduction and categories of reductionism , 1992, Synthese.

[13]  R. Courant,et al.  Methods of Mathematical Physics , 1962 .

[14]  R. Batterman A ‘Modern’ (= Victorian?) Attitude Towards Scientific Understanding , 2000 .

[15]  Thomas Nickles,et al.  Two Concepts of Intertheoretic Reduction , 1973 .

[16]  Thermal flow in porous media , 1987 .

[17]  Alexander Rueger,et al.  Physical Emergence, Diachronic And Synchronic , 2000, Synthese.

[18]  Jeffry L. Ramsey Construction by Reduction , 1995, Philosophy of Science.

[19]  Donald R. Smith Singular-perturbation theory , 1985 .

[20]  Philip M. Morse,et al.  Methods of Mathematical Physics , 1947, The Mathematical Gazette.

[21]  E. Sanchez-Palencia Non-Homogeneous Media and Vibration Theory , 1980 .

[22]  P. J. Holmes,et al.  Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields , 1983, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[23]  M. Redhead Models in Physics* , 1980, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[24]  Investigations of the concept of reduction II , 1981 .

[25]  Hinch Perturbation Methods , 1991 .