The changing nature of user attitudes toward virtual world technology: A longitudinal study

Virtual world technologies have been utilized in gaming for a number of years but only recently have they been applied as a serious tool for business. Many business applications have been identified, including the use of virtual worlds for team collaboration, training, and education, but a question remains about whether users will accept the premise that virtual worlds represent useful environments for engaging in business functions. We address this question by examining user reactions to virtual worlds. The first study looks at attitudes of users of the virtual world Second Life during three time periods (i.e., before exposure to the environment, after an information session and discussion of Second Life, and after use of the environment). Two variables, user acceptance of virtual world technologies and user self-efficacy, were examined as the primary dependent measures. Results show that while self-efficacy increases over time, user acceptance decreases in a highly correlated pattern. A second study investigates the underlying causes of the observed pattern of user acceptance using a content analysis of written reflections of user experiences. Both studies paint a detailed picture of user intentions and some of the reasons these intentions developed after use. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of these results for business managers and researchers.

[1]  Chin-Lung Hsu,et al.  Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[2]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[3]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: a longitudinal study , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[4]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Virtual Environments and the Enhancement of Spatial Behavior: Towards a Comprehensive Research Agenda , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[5]  Susan Wiedenbeck,et al.  Self-efficacy and mental models in learning to program , 2004, ITiCSE '04.

[6]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[7]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[8]  R. Weber Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[9]  David A. Bray,et al.  Second Life and Other Virtual Worlds: A Roadmap for Research , 2007, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[10]  V. Venkatesh,et al.  TELECOMMUTING TECHNOLOGY IMPLEMENTATIONS: A WITHIN‐ AND BETWEEN‐SUBJECTS LONGITUDINAL FIELD STUDY , 2002 .

[11]  Richard,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace , 2022 .

[12]  M. Press Presence : teleoperators and virtual environments. , 2014 .

[13]  Christoph Lattemann,et al.  USER ACCEPTANCE OF VIRTUAL WORLDS , 2008 .

[14]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  The Evolving Nature of the Computer Self-Efficacy Construct: An Empirical Investigation of Measurement Construction, Validity, Reliability and Stability Over Time , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[16]  Susan A. Brown,et al.  Who's Afraid of the Virtual World? Anxiety and Computer-Mediated Communication , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[17]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[18]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A test of task-technology fit theory for group support systems , 1999, DATB.

[19]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Quo vadis TAM? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  User acceptance of virtual worlds: the Hedonic framework , 2007, DATB.

[21]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[22]  W. Lewis Johnson,et al.  Extending virtual humans to support team training in virtual reality , 2003 .

[23]  Venkatesh,et al.  Computer Technology Training in the Workplace: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Effect of Mood. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[24]  A. Bandura,et al.  Tests of the generality of self-efficacy theory , 1980, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[25]  S. Parker Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities , 1970 .

[26]  R. Weber Basic content analysis, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[27]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[28]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  User Acceptance Enablers in Individual Decision Making About Technology: Toward an Integrated Model , 2002, Decis. Sci..

[29]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[30]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[31]  Phil Turner,et al.  Place, Sense of Place, and Presence , 2006, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[32]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[33]  Colin Seymour-Ure,et al.  Content Analysis in Communication Research. , 1972 .

[34]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[35]  Parvati Dev,et al.  Virtual worlds and team training. , 2007, Anesthesiology clinics.

[36]  Charles D. Barrett Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[37]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[38]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[39]  J. Hox,et al.  Sufficient Sample Sizes for Multilevel Modeling , 2005 .

[40]  D. Leidner,et al.  Stepping into the internet: new ventures in virtual worlds , 2011 .