Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction in Low-Tube-Voltage Contrast-Enhanced Neck CT: Evaluation of Objective and Subjective Image Quality

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dose-saving techniques in neck CT cause increased image noise that can be counteracted by iterative reconstruction. Our aim was to evaluate the image quality of advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) in contrast-enhanced low-tube-voltage neck CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients underwent 90-kV(peak) neck CT by using third-generation 192-section dual-source CT. Image series were reconstructed with standard filtered back-projection and ADMIRE strength levels 1, 3, and 5. Attenuation and noise of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, internal jugular vein, submandibular gland, tongue, subscapularis muscle, and cervical fat were measured. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were calculated. Two radiologists assessed image noise, image contrast, delineation of smaller structures, and overall diagnostic acceptability. Interobserver agreement was calculated. RESULTS: Image noise was significantly reduced by using ADMIRE compared with filtered back-projection with the lowest noise observed in ADMIRE 5 (filtered back-projection, 9.4 ± 2.4 Hounsfield units [HU]; ADMIRE 1, 8.3 ± 2.8 HU; ADMIRE 3, 6.7 ± 2.0 HU; ADMIRE 5, 5.4 ± 1.7 HU; all, P < .001). Sternocleidomastoid SNR and internal jugular vein–sternocleidomastoid contrast-to-noise ratios were significantly higher for ADMIRE with the best results in ADMIRE 5 (all, P < .001). Subjective image quality and image contrast of ADMIRE 3 and 5 were consistently rated better than those for filtered back-projection and ADMIRE 1 (all, P < .001). Image noise was rated highest for ADMIRE 5 (all, P < .005). Delineation of smaller structures was voted higher in all ADMIRE strength levels compared with filtered back-projection (P < .001). Global interobserver agreement was good (0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced 90-kVp neck CT is feasible, and ADMIRE 5 shows superior objective image quality compared with filtered back-projection. ADMIRE 3 and 5 show the best subjective image quality.

[1]  T. Vogl,et al.  Evaluation of image quality and dose reduction of 80 kVp neck computed tomography in patients with suspected peritonsillar abscess. , 2015, Clinical radiology.

[2]  M. Uder,et al.  Automated Tube Voltage Selection in Thoracoabdominal Computed Tomography at High Pitch Using a Third-Generation Dual-Source Scanner: Image Quality and Radiation Dose Performance , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[3]  T. Lehnert,et al.  Objective and subjective image quality of primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma on head and neck low-tube-voltage 80-kVp computed tomography , 2015, Neuroradiology.

[4]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of an Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm for Low-Contrast Detectability with a Third-Generation Dual-Source Multidetector CT Scanner: Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction in a Multireader Study. , 2015, Radiology.

[5]  Y. Anzai,et al.  Impact of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction on Image Quality of Contrast-Enhanced Neck CT , 2015, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[6]  S Gordic,et al.  Advanced modelled iterative reconstruction for abdominal CT: qualitative and quantitative evaluation. , 2014, Clinical radiology.

[7]  T. Lehnert,et al.  Low-Tube-Voltage 80-kVp Neck CT: Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[8]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Ultralow-Dose Chest Computed Tomography for Pulmonary Nodule Detection: First Performance Evaluation of Single Energy Scanning With Spectral Shaping , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[9]  M. Uder,et al.  Automated tube voltage adaptation in head and neck computed tomography between 120 and 100 kV: effects on image quality and radiation dose , 2014, Neuroradiology.

[10]  S. Haßfeld,et al.  Diagnostic imaging modalities in head and neck disease. , 2014, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[11]  T. Lehnert,et al.  Acute Intracranial Hemorrhage in CT: Benefits of Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction Techniques , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[12]  S. Kollias,et al.  Low Kilovoltage CT of the Neck with 70 kVp: Comparison with a Standard Protocol , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[13]  T. Vogl,et al.  Ultra-low dose dual-source high-pitch computed tomography of the paranasal sinus: diagnostic sensitivity and radiation dose , 2012, Acta radiologica.

[14]  Daniel Kolditz,et al.  Iterative reconstruction methods in X-ray CT. , 2012, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[15]  C D Claussen,et al.  Iterative Reconstruction in Head CT: Image Quality of Routine and Low-Dose Protocols in Comparison with Standard Filtered Back-Projection , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[16]  Christian Stahl,et al.  Dose Reduction in Abdominal Computed Tomography: Intraindividual Comparison of Image Quality of Full-Dose Standard and Half-Dose Iterative Reconstructions With Dual-Source Computed Tomography , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[17]  Mikael Gunnarsson,et al.  Automatic exposure control in computed tomography – an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers , 2010, Acta radiologica.

[18]  Jessica Curtis.  Computed tomography shielding methods: a literature review. , 2010, Radiologic technology.

[19]  Rebecca S Lewis,et al.  Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[20]  John Damilakis,et al.  Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult multidetector CT examinations: a phantom study on dose reduction and image quality. , 2008, Medical physics.

[21]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  A. Srinivasan,et al.  Imaging of vascular lesions of the head and neck. , 2015, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[23]  D. Nunez,et al.  Imaging of acute head and neck infections. , 2012, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[24]  H. Greess,et al.  Dose reduction in computed tomography by attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current: evaluation of six anatomical regions , 2000, European Radiology.