Managing Model Fidelity for Efficient Optimization of Antennas using Variable-resolution Electromagnetic Simulations

Electromagnetic (EM) simulation has become an important tool in the design of contemporary antenna structures. However, accurate simulations of realistic antenna models are expensive and therefore design automation by employing EM solver within an optimization loop may be prohibitive because of its high computational cost. Efficient EM-driven antenna design can be performed using surrogate-based optimization (SBO). A generic approach to construct surrogate models of antennas involves the use of coarse-discretization EM simulations (low-fidelity models). A proper selection of the surrogate model fidelity is a key factor that influences both the performance of the design optimization process and its computational cost. Despite its importance, this issue has not yet been investigated in the literature. Here, we focus on a problem of proper surrogate model management. More specifically, we carry out a numerical study that aims at finding a trade-off between the design cost and reliability of the SBO algorithms. Our considerations are illustrated using several antenna design cases. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the use of multiple models of different fidelity may be beneficial to reduce the design cost while maintaining the robustness of the optimization process.

[1]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A tutorial on support vector regression , 2004, Stat. Comput..

[2]  Martin D. Buhmann,et al.  Radial Basis Functions: Theory and Implementations: Preface , 2003 .

[3]  J.E. Rayas-Sanchez,et al.  EM-based optimization of microwave circuits using artificial neural networks: the state-of-the-art , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[4]  N. M. Alexandrov,et al.  A trust-region framework for managing the use of approximation models in optimization , 1997 .

[5]  Jong-Gwan Yook,et al.  Wideband Microstrip Patch Antenna With U-Shaped Parasitic Elements , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[6]  Yong-Chang Jiao,et al.  A BROADBAND CPW-FED T-SHAPE SLOT ANTENNA , 2007 .

[7]  Hao Ling,et al.  Design of a Band-Notched Planar Monopole Antenna Using Genetic Algorithm Optimization , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[8]  G. Macchiarella,et al.  Microwave filter design by synthesis and optimization , 2007, IEEE Microwave Magazine.

[9]  S Koziel,et al.  Shape-Preserving Response Prediction for Microwave Design Optimization , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[10]  Y. Rahmat-Samii,et al.  Analysis and Particle Swarm Optimization of Correlator Antenna Arrays for Radio Astronomy Applications , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[11]  Slawomir Koziel,et al.  Progress in Simulator-Based Tuning—The Art of Tuning Space Mapping [Application Notes] , 2010, IEEE Microwave Magazine.

[12]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization , 2009 .

[13]  Lei Xia,et al.  Support Vector Regression Model for Millimeter Wave Transitions , 2007 .

[14]  Qi-Jun Zhang,et al.  Neural Network Inverse Modeling and Applications to Microwave Filter Design , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[15]  P. W. Hemker,et al.  Space Mapping and Defect Correction , 2005 .

[16]  M. F. Pantoja,et al.  A Hybrid Genetic-Algorithm Space-Mapping Tool for the Optimization of Antennas , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[17]  Slawomir Koziel,et al.  Simulation-Driven Design in Microwave Engineering: Application Case Studies , 2011, Computational Optimization and Applications in Engineering and Industry.

[18]  Hendrik Rogier,et al.  Surrogate-based infill optimization applied to electromagnetic problems , 2010 .

[19]  Nasimuddin,et al.  Wideband microstrip antennas with sandwich substrate , 2008 .

[20]  Andrew Lewis,et al.  Multiobjective optimization for small meander wire dipole antennas in a fixed area using ant colony system , 2009 .

[21]  Y. Rahmat-Samii,et al.  Parallel particle swarm optimization and finite- difference time-domain (PSO/FDTD) algorithm for multiband and wide-band patch antenna designs , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[22]  James C. Rautio Perfectly calibrated internal ports in EM analysis of planar circuits , 2008, 2008 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest.

[23]  R. Haupt,et al.  Antenna Design With a Mixed Integer Genetic Algorithm , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[24]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Metamodels for Computer-based Engineering Design: Survey and recommendations , 2001, Engineering with Computers.

[25]  J.W. Bandler,et al.  Space mapping: the state of the art , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[26]  Hans Schantz,et al.  The art and science of ultrawideband antennas , 2005 .

[27]  J.W. Bandler,et al.  Space Mapping With Adaptive Response Correction for Microwave Design Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[28]  S. Koziel,et al.  A Space-Mapping Framework for Engineering Optimization—Theory and Implementation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[29]  S. Koziel,et al.  Space mapping , 2008, IEEE Microwave Magazine.

[30]  S. Amari,et al.  Space-mapping optimization of planar coupled-resonator microwave filters , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.