On the Imperative Solicitude for Evolvability Evaluation in Value Management

A rapidly changing market environment is forcing contemporary organizations to continually adapt themselves. This causes the need for organizational structures, processes as well as their supporting information systems (IS) to adapt accordingly. Nevertheless it is striking to note that few value management practices explicitly incorporate evolvability as an important criterion for their evaluation of information technology dependent strategic initiatives (ITDSI). In this paper, the authors try to make a contribution regarding this issue. They explore some possibilities for assessing the evolvability of an information technology (IT) application. In addition, a set of five specific management guidelines is proposed to guide organizations, which are willing to address this issue, in their efforts. This should enable an organization to more easily select and deploy evolvable information systems, enhance its overall alignment with its environment and obtain a competitive advantage. The relevance of our approach is demonstrated by showing how it fits within the enterprise goals, IT goals and enabling practices as defined by the COBIT framework.

[1]  Jan Verelst,et al.  Positioning the Normalized Systems Theory in a Design Theory Framework , 2012, BMSD.

[2]  Donald H. Liles,et al.  Using IDEF and QFD to develop an organizational decision support methodology for the strategic justification of computer-integrated technologies , 1995 .

[3]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Motives for establishing shared service centers in public administrations , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[4]  Jan Verelst,et al.  Normalized systems: re-creating information technology based on laws for software evolvability , 2009 .

[5]  Philip Huysmans,et al.  On the feasibility of normalized enterprises : applying normalized systems theory to the high-level design of entreprises , 2011 .

[6]  Isaca COBIT 5: Enabling Processes , 2012 .

[7]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[8]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Competing for the Future , 1994 .

[9]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Building Change-Readiness Capabilities in the IS Organization: Insights From the Bell Atlantic Experience , 1997, MIS Q..

[10]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[11]  Dieter Van Nuffel,et al.  Towards designing modular and evolvable business processes , 2011 .

[12]  Steven De Haes,et al.  IT Value Management as a Vehicle to Unleash the Business Value from IT Enabled Investments: A Literature Study , 2012, Int. J. IT Bus. Alignment Gov..

[13]  Kris Ven,et al.  The transformation of requirements into software primitives: Studying evolvability based on systems theoretic stability , 2011, Sci. Comput. Program..

[14]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[15]  Steven De Haes,et al.  Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems ( MCIS ) 2012 THE IDENTIFICATION AND DEFINITION OF VALUE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES USED TO DEPLOY IS INVESTMENTS , 2017 .

[16]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Governing buyer–supplier relationships through transactional and relational mechanisms: Evidence from China , 2009 .

[17]  Ward Cunningham,et al.  The WyCash portfolio management system , 1992, OOPSLA '92.

[18]  R. Peterson Integration Strategies and Tactics for Information Technology Governance , 2004 .

[19]  Varun Grover,et al.  An empirical evaluation of stages of strategic information systems planning: patterns of process design and effectiveness , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[20]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[21]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  BOARD OF DIRECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN RESTRUCTURING: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD VERSUS MANAGERIAL CONTROLS , 1993 .

[22]  Blake Ives,et al.  Review: IT-Dependent Strategic Initiatives and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature , 2005, MIS Q..

[23]  Tom Mens,et al.  Measuring software flexibility , 2006, IEE Proc. Softw..

[24]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[25]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Realizing the Business Value of Information Technology Investments: An Organizational Process , 2004, MIS Q. Executive.

[26]  Kris Ven,et al.  The Automatic Discovery of Violations to the Normalized Systems Design Theorems: A Feasibility Study , 2010, 2010 Fifth International Conference on Software Engineering Advances.

[27]  John M. Ward,et al.  Beyond strategic information systems: towards an IS capability , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Develop Long-Term Competitiveness through IT Assets , 1996 .

[29]  Sanjay Bose,et al.  Impact of service-oriented architecture on enterprise systems, organizational structures, and individuals , 2005, IBM Syst. J..

[30]  Kris Ven,et al.  Towards evolvable software architectures based on systems theoretic stability , 2012, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[31]  Hossein Sharifi,et al.  Towards Theory Building in Agile Manufacturing Strategy—A Taxonomical Approach , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[32]  Yael Grushka-Cockayne,et al.  The impact of project portfolio management on information technology projects , 2005 .

[33]  Steven De Haes,et al.  An Exploratory Study into IT Governance Implementations and its Impact on Business/IT Alignment , 2009, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[34]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Addressing Business Agility Challenges with Enterprise Systems , 2009, MIS Q. Executive.

[35]  Raduan Che Rose,et al.  The relationship between information technology acceptance and organizational agility in Malaysia , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[36]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  How Does Enterprise Architecture Add Value to Organisations? , 2011, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[38]  Jan Verelst,et al.  Building Evolvable Software Using Normalized Systems Theory: A Case Study , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[39]  L. Jackson Digital filters and signal processing , 1985 .

[40]  Monideepa Tarafdar,et al.  Understanding the influence of information systems competencies on process innovation: A resource-based view , 2007, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Michael J. Earl,et al.  Experiences in Strategic Information Systems Planning , 1993, MIS Q..

[42]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in 5's: A Synthesis of the Research on Organization Design , 1980, Management Science.

[43]  Jan Verelst,et al.  "IT Isn't Different After All": Implications of Normalized Systems for the Industrialization of Software Development , 2013, 2013 IEEE 15th Conference on Business Informatics.

[44]  Sabine Matook,et al.  Competitive advantage from mandatory investments: An empirical study of Australian firms , 2009, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Eric Overby,et al.  Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Deependra Moitra,et al.  Web services and flexible business processes: towards the adaptive enterprise , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[47]  William Snyder,et al.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge , 2002 .

[48]  Meir M. Lehman Programs, life cycles, and laws of software evolution , 1980 .

[49]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Building Enterprise Architecture Agility and Sustenance with SOA , 2008, Communications of the Association for Information Systems.

[50]  Moshe Farjoun Beyond Dualism: Stability and Change As a Duality , 2010 .

[51]  Janis L. Gogan,et al.  A comprehensive and cohesive IT value management capability: case studies in the North Amercian life insurance industry , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[52]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Change factors requiring agility and implications for IT , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Ying Lu,et al.  Understanding the Link Between Information Technology Capability and Organizational Agility: An Empirical Examination , 2011, MIS Q..

[54]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[55]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Information Technology Competence of Business Managers: A Definition and Research Model , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[56]  Colin Ashurst,et al.  Improving the impact of IT development projects: the benefits realization capability model , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Mohamed Fayad,et al.  Aspects of software adaptability , 1996, CACM.

[58]  Haya Ajjan,et al.  Information Technology Portfolio Management: Literature Review, Framework, and Research Issues , 2008, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[59]  Octavian Paul Rotaru,et al.  Reusability metrics for software components , 2005, The 3rd ACS/IEEE International Conference onComputer Systems and Applications, 2005..